Slitherine

Can't see the above list for looking in the book.

Anmy idea what it would contain ?

Scrumpy wrote:Can't see the above list for looking in the book.

Ooops. Another thing for the errata.

Any idea what it would contain ?

Typical troops from the main 30YW French list.

rbodleyscott wrote:

Scrumpy wrote:Can't see the above list for looking in the book.

Ooops. Another thing for the errata.

Par for the course really - we always manage to miss an ally or two

We would be disappointed if we didn't have our 'hunt the rare error' game to play.

Talking of allies I see the Parliamentarians do not get an option of a Scottish Covenanter ally. I assume this is intentional... Marston moor is a good example of these two armies working hand in hand.

Would it be correct to assume that this was 'too big' for the lists and thus the no ally option, as small detachments were not used in the armies just when they truly combined, which seems a little odd but o.k.

mellis1644 wrote:Talking of allies I see the Parliamentarians do not get an option of a Scottish Covenanter ally. I assume this is intentional... Marston moor is a good example of these two armies working hand in hand.

Would it be correct to assume that this was 'too big' for the lists and thus the no ally option, as small detachments were not used in the armies just when they truly combined, which seems a little odd but o.k.

Can I refer sir to the relevant bible-bashing Scots list where all will be revealed ...

[quote="nikgaukroger"]

Can I refer sir to the relevant bible-bashing Scots list where all will be revealed ...[/quote]

Thanks Nik.... Yes it is - Do'h. Time to get reading more I guess. RTFM for me.

mellis1644 wrote:

nikgaukroger wrote:
Can I refer sir to the relevant bible-bashing Scots list where all will be revealed ...

Thanks Nik.... Yes it is - Do'h. Time to get reading more I guess. RTFM for me.

Can anyone explain why the quotes system sometimes perversely refuses to work? - it annoys the hell out of me.

Bah, it worked that time - but it didn't in the post I quoted.

This error (missing French 30YW allies) is in two lists - Later 80YW Dutch and Later 30YW Swedish and Weimarian.

timmy1 wrote:This error (missing French 30YW allies) is in two lists - Later 80YW Dutch and Later 30YW Swedish and Weimarian.

But presumably the errata sheet only needs to contain one.

Correct. :)