Page 1 of 1

Points values.

Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:01 pm
by TimSnoddy
Is everyone content with points values as they are or should the values/ abilities of troops be amended? I realise no points system can ever give a perfect match in 100% of circumstances. There is only a small circle of FOG players here in N Ireland so forgive me if my impressions are wrong due to our small pool of players.

There is a feeling that superior is too cheap. This comes to the fore when an army can be composed by mostly superior troops, eg, Swiss pike, Christian Nubian archers. I have never seen Christian Nubian fielded not taking the superior option. Also perhaps that knights are too expensive.

Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:52 pm
by stecal
Superior is too cheap, but I'd rather they fixed the imballances with rules changes than points/lists changes. I don't really want to have to buy 12 army list books again.