Page 1 of 1
Unusual overlap/restricted area situation
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:56 am
by ottomanmjm
The following situation occurred in a game the other day. L1-L4 is a 4 base Light foot unit facing down. X1-X4 is a 4 base Cavalry unit facing down. Y1-Y4 is a 4 base cavalry unit facing up. Units L and X belong to player A and unit Y belongs to player B. Units X and Y are in combat and neither can conform due to other units on either side (not shown in the diagram).
Code: Select all
L1L1L2L2
L3L3L4L4 X1X1X2X2
X3X3X4X4
Y1Y1Y2Y2
Y3Y3Y4Y4
In player A's turn he wants to move unit L into on overlap position, but as units X and Y are not lined up this would require unit L moving into front edge contact with unit Y, to get an edge to edge and corner to corner contact with unit X. Is this permissible?
If so, in player B's turn would unit Y conform by moving to the left, assuming there was space to conform, so that one base was lined up with unit L (as this would be the shortest move)?
If unit L did not move into overlap is it considered to be in the restricted area of unit Y? It is directly in front of part of unit Y and there seems to be no mention in the rules about a restricted area being blocked by a unit being in combat.
Regards
Martin
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:06 am
by deadtorius
you can't move into overlap as there are enemy units currently overlapping so the only way to engage them in melee is to charge the enemy who are not directly involved in a melee. Being lights you can't charge them.
Oddly it does appear that overlapping units would exert a restricted area so the lights would be limited to normal restricted area move restrictions. Does seem odd but perhaps that was a way of forcing players to charge in to reinforce against an engaged enemy instead of a free lets move on their flank and flank charge them next turn cheese move.
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:32 am
by ottomanmjm
deadtorius wrote:you can't move into overlap as there are enemy units currently overlapping so the only way to engage them in melee is to charge the enemy who are not directly involved in a melee. Being lights you can't charge them.
Perhaps my diagram was not too clear. Both front rank bases of unit Y were engaged with both front rank bases of unit X, with about 10mm of the right hand side of the left hand element of unit Y actually in contact with unit X. There are no other units in contact or overlap with either unit X or unit Y.
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:02 am
by hammy
Threre is nothing in the FoG rules to say that troops ever lose their restricted area. Nothing obstructs restricted areas either.
Even a routing BG has a restricted area and I can remember one instance where one of my BGs was so restricted to my cost

Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:55 pm
by petedalby
Units X and Y are in combat and neither can conform due to other units on either side
Please clarify?
See page 71 - could those BGs on either side be shifted sideways to enable the conform to take place?
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:25 pm
by deadtorius
you can shove non-fighting units aside when conforming so most likely they should have been able to conform, in which case the LI could have moved into an overlap position in their movement phase. Being lights they will only get to add 1 die to the melee but in some cases every extra die might help.
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:16 am
by Cerberias
deadtorius wrote:you can shove non-fighting units aside when conforming so most likely they should have been able to conform, in which case the LI could have moved into an overlap position in their movement phase. Being lights they will only get to add 1 die to the melee but in some cases every extra die might help.
The situation we had was such that unit X could not push unit L out of the way to conform because unit L would have had to push another friendly unit off the table. Unit X could not conform the other way as there were units in combat. Similarly unit Y was restricted from conforming due to friends in contact and friends extending to the table edge. I did not show these units as I wanted top keep the diagram simple.
So the question remains can unit L move into side edge to side edge contact with unit X and provide an overlap even though part of its front edge is in conctact with the front edge of unit Y? Remembering that the base of Y contacted by unit L is in combat with unit X.
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:22 am
by philqw78
L is pinned, so must stay in front. X and Y are fighting as if conformed but arent, so IMO if L moved forwards into frontal contact L would fight as if in an overlap. L would Conform to a proper overlap position in its next movement phase.
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:26 am
by gozerius
I agree with Phil.
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:47 am
by philqw78
gozerius wrote:I agree with Phil.
Are you feeling OK?
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 1:05 am
by gozerius
philqw78 wrote:gozerius wrote:I agree with Phil.
Are you feeling OK?
You're right. I better take my temperature and then lay down a bit.
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 8:22 am
by ottomanmjm
philqw78 wrote:L is pinned, so must stay in front. X and Y are fighting as if conformed but arent, so IMO if L moved forwards into frontal contact L would fight as if in an overlap. L would Conform to a proper overlap position in its next movement phase.
Thanks, thats what we thought. The only confusing thing was that in unit Y's turn the shortest conform move would seem to be a short move to the left so that one base would be in frontal contact with unit L. We decided that althiugh unit Y was in frontal contact with both L and X it was actually fighting X so had to conform to X.
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 2:19 pm
by gozerius
ottomanmjm wrote:philqw78 wrote:L is pinned, so must stay in front. X and Y are fighting as if conformed but arent, so IMO if L moved forwards into frontal contact L would fight as if in an overlap. L would Conform to a proper overlap position in its next movement phase.
Thanks, thats what we thought. The only confusing thing was that in unit Y's turn the shortest conform move would seem to be a short move to the left so that one base would be in frontal contact with unit L. We decided that althiugh unit Y was in frontal contact with both L and X it was actually fighting X so had to conform to X.
Oh! In that case L cannot claim to be moving into an overlap position. It only works if the unconformed bases would conform in such a way that the bases would end up in full front edge contact with their opposites. In your situation L would be counted as in front edge contact with the enemy and that is not an option for LF.
(See what a little rest can do, Phil?)
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:10 pm
by philqw78
gozerius wrote:See what a little rest can do, Phil?)
You are obviously fully refreshed
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:22 am
by domblas
hammy wrote:Threre is nothing in the FoG rules to say that troops ever lose their restricted area. Nothing obstructs restricted areas either.
Even a routing BG has a restricted area and I can remember one instance where one of my BGs was so restricted to my cost

hi foggers,
do you mean that restricted area can also extend through ennemy bases? Like for exemple if a BG fights a BG of HF in two ranks (3cm deep) the RA still takes effect on 2 cm behind the ennemy bases?
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:33 am
by philqw78
domblas wrote:do you mean that restricted area can also extend through ennemy bases? Like for exemple if a BG fights a BG of HF in two ranks (3cm deep) the RA still takes effect on 2 cm behind the ennemy bases?
Yes