Page 1 of 1

LF Evades and such..

Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 3:10 pm
by Blathergut
Re: Better LF chasing poorer LF away always but then being pinned by same said cheapies.

What if the same test that is used (i.e., likeliness to win combat) to determine if something evades were used for a CMT to charge? Make all LF have to test to charge anything. At least the cheap LF would risk failing and being useless for the turn and maybe even in the way of other troops. Maybe there could be additional minuses for degree of difference (i.e. a - on the roll for each drop in combat chance?).

Re: LF Evades and such..

Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 3:15 pm
by TheGrayMouser
Blathergut wrote:Re: Better LF chasing poorer LF away always but then being pinned by same said cheapies.

What if the same test that is used (i.e., likeliness to win combat) to determine if something evades were used for a CMT to charge? Make all LF have to test to charge anything. At least the cheap LF would risk failing and being useless for the turn and maybe even in the way of other troops. Maybe there could be additional minuses for degree of difference (i.e. a - on the roll for each drop in combat chance?).
I have posted that suggestion as well.... no more Commando slingers!