Page 1 of 1
effects of terrain on close combat
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:24 am
by BlackPrince
If a BG of MF bow are entirely in an open field but on the edge of it they are not considered in open terrain. They are charged by CAV lancers who contact the front of the MF are the CAV considered to be in open terrain or to be in the open field?
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:37 am
by timurilenk
It depends where the bases are - if no part is on the terrain then they are in open - it is best to deploy the MF a fraction inside the terrain.
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:58 am
by pcelella
timurilenk wrote:It depends where the bases are - if no part is on the terrain then they are in open - it is best to deploy the MF a fraction inside the terrain.
I don't believe that is true. The way I've seen it played is that if the MF bases are in the open when hit by the lancers, they are then considered to be in the open. If you want the protection of being in terrain for the purposes of combat and cohesion, then the entire unit needs to be in the terrain with no portion extending out that gets contacted.
Peter C
Sword and Sandal Gaming Blog
http://swordandsandalgaming.blogspot.com/
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:00 am
by timurilenk
pcelella wrote:timurilenk wrote:It depends where the bases are - if no part is on the terrain then they are in open - it is best to deploy the MF a fraction inside the terrain.
I don't believe that is true. The way I've seen it played is that if the MF bases are in the open when hit by the lancers, they are then considered to be in the open. If you want the protection of being in terrain for the purposes of combat and cohesion, then the entire unit needs to be in the terrain with no portion extending out that gets contacted.
Peter C
Sword and Sandal Gaming Blog
http://swordandsandalgaming.blogspot.com/
Well what you say may be correct, but I was answering the question about the Cv

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:06 am
by philqw78
At impact if the mounted/HF are not in the terrain the MF are facing them in the open. This may change after conforming
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:13 am
by timurilenk
philqw78 wrote:At impact if the mounted/HF are not in the terrain the MF are facing them in the open. This may change after conforming
You said what I was trying to say Phil, but much more eloquently

Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:30 am
by grahambriggs
timurilenk wrote:philqw78 wrote:At impact if the mounted/HF are not in the terrain the MF are facing them in the open. This may change after conforming
You said what I was trying to say Phil, but much more eloquently

No they are not. The OP has said that the MF are
entirely in an open field. So the MF can't be in the open....
Of course it doesn't necessarily help them depending on how you read the cohesion test -1 for "MF testing for losing close combat vs Mtd or HF in open".
i.e. does the MF have to be in the open or is it the HF/Mtd? I think authors have said before it's the latter. Pity that isn't cleared up in the FAQ.
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:41 am
by hammy
Try P135 Open terrain
POAs and cohesion test modifiers only applying in 'open terrain' do not count if the base claiming the POA or causing the cohesion test modifier even partly enters uneven, rough or difficult terrain
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:00 pm
by kevinj
No they are not. The OP has said that the MF are entirely in an open field. So the MF can't be in the open....
That's true, but if they are lining the edge, they can be hit by Lancers who do not have to enter the terrain themselves, therefore Hammy's point re P135 applies and they can claim a POA for Lance.
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:20 pm
by hammy
If MF are being charged by lancers then for the lancers to count their lance POA the lancers need to be entirely in the open. For the MF to count a POA penalty then at least one of the enemy bases fighting them has to be entirely in the open.
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:10 pm
by petedalby
it is best to deploy the MF a fraction inside the terrain.
That's why this previous post was very good advice.
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:06 pm
by Polkovnik
Agreed -it would be completely stupid to deploy MF with the edge of their base outside of the terrain, where they can be contacted by HF or mounted who do not have to enter the terrain.
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:49 pm
by grahambriggs
Polkovnik wrote:Agreed -it would be completely stupid to deploy MF with the edge of their base outside of the terrain, where they can be contacted by HF or mounted who do not have to enter the terrain.
It sometimes happens with undrilled MF. e.g. I've seen it happen that missile MF want to short move to stay within the terrain, fail CMT so decide to poke out they may be able to move short again and get some heavy shooting in. A second failed CMT test leaft them a bit embarrassed!
Also, players transitioning from DBM make this mistake. In that system foot withe any part of their base in terrain can given mouted a severe combat penalty.
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:31 pm
by zoltan
So if a BG in line of 4 Cav lancer bases fights a BG in line of 4 MF bases, where three of each base is fully in terrain and one of each base is completely in open terrain, and the cav win, does the MF take a minus for losing to (one) cav in the open?
Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:13 pm
by ShrubMiK
Yes
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:03 am
by petedalby
Agreed
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:56 pm
by BlackPrince
And I thought I was asking a dumb question but from your responses it can be unclear.
Main points;
If you opponent lines up on the edge of a terrain feature clarify exactly is the BG on the every edge or slightly back as soon as the BG has finished moving.
I good tip for undrilled troops make sure your opponent passes a CMT something easily over looked. As they may assume you can stop automatically at the edge of a terrain feature.