Page 1 of 2
Elephant proof mounted
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:54 pm
by Skythian
We recently played a game with Ghaznavids vs mamelukes and we had some questions on "elephant proff" horses. I was unable to find where any list had them, is this a planned part of the rules or do some lists cover it?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:13 pm
by timmy1
Please explain what you mean. The impact of elephants on horse is already greater for the opponents of the nellies...
Elephant proof mounted
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:14 pm
by Skythian
In Warrior, 7th ED WRG and others, some countries/armies had elephant proof horses, i.e they were trained to either work with or fight against them, Classical Indians come readily to mind. Some countries/armies had the same for camel proofing their forces. I did not see that, though I have to admit that I have not read every list.
My question stems from "NOT FINDING" anything when looking at the Ghaznavid list and others since they have elephants as a troop type along with mounted. Are there any "elephant proof' mounted forces?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:18 pm
by timmy1
Not that I have seen.
Re: Elephant proof mounted
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:05 pm
by rbodleyscott
Skythian wrote:In Warrior, 7th ED WRG and others, some countries/armies had elephant proof horses, i.e they were trained to either work with or fight against them, Classical Indians come readily to mind. Some countries/armies had the same for camel proofing their forces. I did not see that, though I have to admit that I have not read every list.
My question stems from "NOT FINDING" anything when looking at the Ghaznavid list and others since they have elephants as a troop type along with mounted. Are there any "elephant proof' mounted forces?
There is no need for "elephant proofing" of friendly mounted. Provided that their battle group does not have elephants on both sides of it, only 2 bases will be in range of the elephants to be disordered. This is less than 3 so no combat dice are lost.
We were rather pleased with this simple way of making elephants have more effect on enemies than on friends, as it saved a whole lot of possibly controversial list exceptions, extra points costs or demands for "freebies" to be paid for etc etc.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:05 pm
by peterrjohnston
Unless you plan on keeping your elephants immediately behind your cavalry BGs, it doesn't matter. Say, for example, you have a BG of 4 cavalry fighting next to a BG of elephants:
CvCvElEl
CvCv
Only two bases are disordered by the elephants, so you would not lose any combat dice.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:06 pm
by peterrjohnston
Great minds post alike

Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:26 pm
by deadtorius
Glad you pointed that out, I have always kept my Selucid cav away from my elephants since I was afraid of losing dice. the things you learn by reading

Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:14 am
by Polkovnik
The friendly cavalry would have a -1 on CMTs though if they are next to the elephants. Worth remembering.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:49 am
by dave_r
Why? They haven't lost to elephants?
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:50 am
by philqw78
They are disordered and we are talking about CMT Dave, not CT. Dont stand your lancers next to elephants, they are more likely to charge
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:51 am
by peterrjohnston
CMT...
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:52 am
by kevinj
Dont stand your lancers next to elephants, they are more likely to charge
Well, it gets them away from the big nasty grey things...

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:57 pm
by kdonovan
One of the strange effects of the CMT -1 is that shock cavalry next to friendly elephants or camels are more likely to charge without orders - sort of odd, maybe they will do anything to get away from those smelly beasts. Mainly affects Hellenistic armies, Rajputs and maybe some Arabs (for lancers & camels).
Kevin
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:39 pm
by spikemesq
Taking a moment to reflect on Kevin Donovan being a "peasant" in the realm of Field of Glory.
As you were.
Spike
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:12 pm
by peterrjohnston
The posts number, and hence the picture, doesn't seem to change anymore. No idea why. So now we're a caste society.

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:00 pm
by timmy1
That's a shame. Reaching 1000 got me a nice new picture
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:13 pm
by timmy1
My numbers seem to still increase, my prior post was 1067
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:26 pm
by peterrjohnston
So does mine... pretty sure it was stuck on the same for days... someone asked me about it too. How odd.
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:46 pm
by rbodleyscott
peterrjohnston wrote:So does mine... pretty sure it was stuck on the same for days... someone asked me about it too. How odd.
All your previous posts get updated to the current post number, so if you look at two of your consecutive posts it looks as if the number hasn't changed, but it has. Spooky, eh?