German peasants revolts
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:40 pm
Karsten,
Any thoughts as to whether a list could be done for these?
Any thoughts as to whether a list could be done for these?
There is still Bow*.Ghaznavid wrote:While doing the Dosza part of the Peasant Revolts (and parallel the Hungarian list) I've come upon the problem with classing the Szeklers. For the time being I've both the LH and the Cv as Bow, Swordsmen, since there is no Light Spear or Bow* available anymore. I wondered if Light Lance might be appropriate, but since 3 full weapon abilities are out, it would be odd to have the LH as Bow, Light Lance, Swordsmen and the Cavalry as Bow, Swordsmen only.
Any suggestions?
Hmm, right I only checked the point cost table, not the capabilities table as I didn't expect Bow* to be a free capability. And yes from what I can say the Szekler changed a bit over time, the richer, better equipped ones joining the pure, western style lancer category, the rest becoming slightly less prone to get stuck in, so triple armament seemed inapropriate for the later list. Still fits for the early (i.e. pre-Ottoman conquest) list.rbodleyscott wrote: There is still Bow*.
Bow*, Light lancers, Swordsmen would be OK provided that you are saying (historically) that they had lost the lance (or the ability to use it effectively) by the time of the Transylvanian-Hungarian list which has already gone to Osprey.
No the ability to take them as either in a single army is intentional. Although I've no strong conviction either way, it's very difficult to say. If you wish to ge detailed I would guess. Keep it both for Hungarian, Slovenian and Swedes. Make it one or the other for German and Danish.nikgaukroger wrote:Couple of questions on the revolting peasants:
1. The peasants that have a HF or MF option, is it OK for them to be mixed or should we sayy all one or the other?
I pondered that bit a long time, it's pretty difficult to be sure to what extend they were spears or pikes. On average they seem to have used pike sized poking instruments. If that qualifies them as pikemen ... I think the numbers are probably ok for the Germans and probably the Danish. I'm less certain on the others. So if you want to reduce the numbers for all or some of them I'm not going to object.nikgaukroger wrote:2. My initial impression is a lot of pikemen, I'd expected more lesser weapon types (probably spearmen). Not sure why but just want to check we are not over-equipping them.
I would have liked to permit larger BGs, but I did not wish to permit them integral rear support. Hence I settled for smaller BGs.nikgaukroger wrote: 3. Pike BG size - just to check that the peasants having smaller pike BG sizes than the Landskneckts (i.e. max 12 not 16) is deliberate.
Ghaznavid wrote:
Hmm, right I only checked the point cost table, not the capabilities table as I didn't expect Bow* to be a free capability. And yes from what I can say the Szekler changed a bit over time, the richer, better equipped ones joining the pure, western style lancer category, the rest becoming slightly less prone to get stuck in, so triple armament seemed inapropriate for the later list. Still fits for the early (i.e. pre-Ottoman conquest) list.
If your intention was to have either I'm tempted to leave it.
No the ability to take them as either in a single army is intentional. Although I've no strong conviction either way, it's very difficult to say. If you wish to ge detailed I would guess. Keep it both for Hungarian, Slovenian and Swedes. Make it one or the other for German and Danish.
I'll think about it, but will bear in mind you've already given it much thoughtI pondered that bit a long time, it's pretty difficult to be sure to what extend they were spears or pikes. On average they seem to have used pike sized poking instruments. If that qualifies them as pikemen ... I think the numbers are probably ok for the Germans and probably the Danish. I'm less certain on the others. So if you want to reduce the numbers for all or some of them I'm not going to object.
I would have liked to permit larger BGs, but I did not wish to permit them integral rear support. Hence I settled for smaller BGs.
It isn't free, it is in the points table, but it was added after 14.01 (in Version 15.11 posted only on the changes since 14.01 thread). Sorry.Ghaznavid wrote:Hmm, right I only checked the point cost table, not the capabilities table as I didn't expect Bow* to be a free capability.rbodleyscott wrote: There is still Bow*.
Bow*, Light lancers, Swordsmen would be OK provided that you are saying (historically) that they had lost the lance (or the ability to use it effectively) by the time of the Transylvanian-Hungarian list which has already gone to Osprey.

As option for the Cv, yes please.nikgaukroger wrote: I take it from this that Bow* should be added?
Ghaznavid wrote:As option for the Cv, yes please.nikgaukroger wrote: I take it from this that Bow* should be added?
More like Cv either Bw, Sw or Bw*, LL, Sw.nikgaukroger wrote:Ghaznavid wrote:As option for the Cv, yes please.nikgaukroger wrote: I take it from this that Bow* should be added?
So Bow*, Light Lancers, Swordsmen.
And the LH as Bow, Light Lancers, Swordsmen?
On the basis they only get 1 dice per 2 bases for shooting anyway.