Page 1 of 1
Wrong figure icons in Great Plains?
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:46 am
by Ironclad
Playing my first Great Plains battle I was surprised to see the Carthaginian Numidian "poor" infantry skirmishers failing to evade. However when I looked more closely at their details, they are showing as medium foot numbering 1500 equipped with spear and javelins (hence their long range fire), which would make more sense given their placing in the main line of battle. If so they presumably need to be on three figure bases instead of the current two.
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:59 am
by Robert241167
This has already been raised with Keith and he confirms it has been corrected for the next update.
Rob
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:11 pm
by Ironclad
Thanks.
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 8:59 am
by keithmartinsmith
Can I clarify that the scenario with the problem is
Great Plains 203BC (AI)
Thanks
Keith
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:46 am
by Ironclad
keithmartinsmith wrote:Can I clarify that the scenario with the problem is
Great Plains 203BC (AI)
Thanks
Keith
Yes it is. I don't know if the details will need altering too - to change them to 1000 strength or whether they are deliberately overstrength mediums. I checked and the current movement allowance looks alright as it is 3 and not a skirmisher 4.
Another scenario where there is a similar type issue is Sentinum 295 BC (PT). It relates to the Roman Auxilia medium infantry who are shown on 6 figure bases with details of 1000 strength and 3 movement - so presumably they should be in 3 figure units.
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:10 pm
by keithmartinsmith
Hi, This has been reported and fixed already. Thanks Keith
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:03 am
by Ironclad
keithmartinsmith wrote:Hi, This has been reported and fixed already. Thanks Keith
Thanks. One of those Roman Auxilia in Sentium is also showing as undrilled - all the other Roman ones are drilled.
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:40 pm
by keithmartinsmith
Thanks for fixed again ready for the next update. Keith