Slitherine

A new official errata (v1.17) is now available for DL from the FoG website.
You can download it here.

For the next version: Today I found another error:

Book: Empire of the Dragon
Pake: 74
List: Tibetan Allies

The allied commander is given the cost of a normal FC/TC (50/35) instead of the cost of an ally (40/25)

KillingZoe wrote:For the next version: Today I found another error:

Book: Empire of the Dragon
Pake: 74
List: Tibetan Allies

The allied commander is given the cost of a normal FC/TC (50/35) instead of the cost of an ally (40/25)

A number of the EotD lists have this error

In LS, all the German lists use "impact" instead of "close combat" for close combat capabilities.
Later German City allies list Fussknechte should be protected, average/poor.

Is it intended that Campanian allies between 337BC and 275BC don't have to choose infantry?

Unfortunatly I think we're still missing one ally list as I don't see an Italian Ostrogothic ally list in the errata.

Can someone please clarify the point costing (both) for the "Free Canton javelinmen" in the Medieval German City Leagues list from Lost Scrolls (p 64)?

2 points for protected LF seems like a great bargain.

von.Lucky wrote:Can someone please clarify the point costing (both) for the "Free Canton javelinmen" in the Medieval German City Leagues list from Lost Scrolls (p 64)?

2 points for protected LF seems like a great bargain.

The protected option shouldn't exist, so the point cost is irrelevant (as well as wrong). Not sure where it comes from either, it should be (and was originally) an option to take them as Average or Poor.

Thanks Karsten the night owl,

So average unprotected 4 points / poor unprotected 2 points?

von.Lucky wrote:Thanks Karsten the night owl,

So average unprotected 4 points / poor unprotected 2 points?

Correct.

Excellent - thanks.