Slitherine

In a game last night my opponent moved a commander to a FRG BG in the JAP and then tried to make a move with the BG but failed his CMT so the BG didn't move. He then wanted to move the commander to another place in the BG. I argued that as the commander had been with the BG for the CMT that he could only move with the BG and that as there was no need to place him in a different possition to avoid him obstructing other BGs that the commander could not move.

I would suggest that you were correct. The rules on commanders are being played quite loosely because they rarely make a difference. It would be nice if people were more aware of the commander movement rules. It always seems a bit picky when one has to point them out, but they are there.

To be honest quite a lot of players play fast and loose with a number of the movement rules. When you play to the letter of the rules yourself it can be a big dissadvantage to let your opponent turn and then double wheel or turn and slide for example.

I can see his point.

Page 50 says "If he moves with the battle group, he must remain in exactly the same position relative to it, unless the formation changes." but page 43 says only that if the battle group takes a CMT when he is with it than he must "remain with the same battle group." The Fragmented BG did not move, so he did not move with it. Wouldn't moving from one part of the BG to another still mean he remains with the same battle group?

How is moving one base from one side of a BG to the other side a legal move that a BG can make? He needs to make a move with the BG - so if the BG can't move (and it couldn't because it failed the CMT) then what move can he make WITH the BG?

Consider a 12 base BG of say LF in a single rank. Put a commander at one end of it. If you don't move the BG can the commander repossition himself right at the other end of the line? Saying that if he is with a BG and the BG doesn't move then he can freely repossition would allow a commander to move 52cm through any type of terrain!!

hammy wrote:Consider a 12 base BG of say LF in a single rank. Put a commander at one end of it. If you don't move the BG can the commander repossition himself right at the other end of the line? Saying that if he is with a BG and the BG doesn't move then he can freely repossition would allow a commander to move 52cm through any type of terrain!!

Well a BG of cavalry can

philqw78 wrote:

hammy wrote:Consider a 12 base BG of say LF in a single rank. Put a commander at one end of it. If you don't move the BG can the commander repossition himself right at the other end of the line? Saying that if he is with a BG and the BG doesn't move then he can freely repossition would allow a commander to move 52cm through any type of terrain!!

Well a BG of cavalry can

And since if said BG of LF was in melee and the general was killed the area testing around it would be 17cm by 67cm he seems to be omnipresent in said BG.

philqw78 wrote:And since if said BG of LF was in melee and the general was killed the area testing around it would be 17cm by 67cm he seems to be omnipresent in said BG.

True...

BTW it could be any 12 base BG, it doesn't have to be LF and come to think of it there aren't many 12 base BGs of LF in the lists

In hindsight and for FOGR perhaps commanders attached to a BG should be considered Omnipresent withinit for command radius purposes. He already is for commander death purposes.

Cleans up a needless bit of detail keeping that isn't needed.

Does it set up too much cheese with commanders attached to 1-deep skirmish units sitting behind/in front of a BL ?

madaxeman wrote:Does it set up too much cheese with commanders attached to 1-deep skirmish units sitting behind/in front of a BL ?

Answer: yes.

Marc

FWIW I think you did it right Hammy.

petedalby wrote:FWIW I think you did it right Hammy.

Pete, this is Hammy you are agreeing with . I didn't think that was allowed. He's sometimes an umpire you know?

Also Pete are you coming to MAWS 40th on 19 March

The BG is stationary. The commander post-CMT must remain with it. The choice of "remain" does not appear to preclude legal movement from one attached position to another as long as he remains with the BG. It is not an unreasonable reading.

I think it is cleaner and saves time if being present for the CMT means the commander can't change position attached to the BG. It could have been written that way.

If the BG moves post-CMT, the rules are clear he remains in exactly the same relative position during the move.

Omnipresence and teleportation would be for FOG Fantasy adaptations.

Pete, this is Hammy you are agreeing with . I didn't think that was allowed. He's sometimes an umpire you know?

I know - but it is a new year!

Also Pete are you coming to MAWS 40th on 19 March

Sadly not - I'm on very strict rations so have to eke out my away days carefully - and it is a bit far for those of us on the south coast.

Hope it goes well though.

petedalby wrote:Sadly not ...................and it is a bit far for those of us on the south coast.

Hope it goes well though.

I could get there form your house in 30 minutes. Unless Bognor has moved

My interpretation has been same as MikeK.

MikeK wrote:The BG is stationary. The commander post-CMT must remain with it. The choice of "remain" does not appear to preclude legal movement from one attached position to another as long as he remains with the BG. It is not an unreasonable reading.

I think it is cleaner and saves time if being present for the CMT means the commander can't change position attached to the BG. It could have been written that way.

If the BG moves post-CMT, the rules are clear he remains in exactly the same relative position during the move.

I agree this seems to be the most logical way to read it.