Testing not to charge.
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:19 am
When testing not to charge do you have to include the +'s for generals?
Geoff.
Geoff.
But then, of course, he cannot fight in the front rank in the impact phase, so the loonies are on their own.Robert241167 wrote:Yes which is why some people move their general out of command radius if they are trying to fail the test.
The anomoly occurs when the general is with the testers and he WANTS them NOT to pass and charge through light troops but his factor stops them charging!!!Geoff2 wrote:When testing not to charge do you have to include the +'s for generals?
Geoff.
He doesn't want them not to pass, you do.titanu wrote:The anomoly occurs when the general is with the testers and he WANTS them NOT to pass and charge through light troops but his factor stops them charging!!!Geoff2 wrote:When testing not to charge do you have to include the +'s for generals?
Geoff.
Which makes the exceptional general the one more likely to WANT to ride down/through his own troops. Not sure I'd want to be in his army.pease1 wrote:Which is why I like rules that allow rash generals to be +1, and exceptional or quality generals to be +1/-1 at the player's choice.
Rash generals should have +1/-1 (perhaps in specific scenario with a strict rule about by which cases he must use +1 and where he must use -1). Exceptional leaders, like Hannibal for example, never would have treated their troops so badly.pease1 wrote:Which is why I like rules that allow rash generals to be +1, and exceptional or quality generals to be +1/-1 at the player's choice.
philqw78 wrote:devious ways.