Slitherine

Pos. Name - Army - Total

1 Cleveland, Lee - Later Mycenaean - 56.2
2 Agnelly, Gino - New Kingdom Egytian - 55.2
3 DeWitt, Jeff - New Kingdom Egytian - 53.0
4 Johnston, Chris - Libyan Egyptian - 48.0
5 Burgoyne, Walt - New Kingdom Egytian - 46.1
6 Jones, Ricky - Neo-Assyrian Empire - 42.1
7 Payne, Steve - Libyan Egyptian - 40.1
8 White, Lance - Later Minoan - 32.1
9 Buttridge, Ian - New Kingdom Egyptian - 30.9
10 Demers, Tom - Mitanni - 29.1
11 Morgan, George - Median - 26.6
12 Gros, Ron - Middle Assyrian - 25.5
13 Swearengen, Chris - Akkadian - 24.8
14 Fraternalli, Simone - Middle Assyrian - 23.6
15 Couvillion, Dave - Mitanni - 21.5
16 Bass, Robert - New Kingdom Egytian - 14.5
17 Jones, William - Cimmerian - 12.2
18 Sierichs, Bill - Hittite - 10.2
19 Bodin, Bill - New Kingdom Egytian - 9.7
20 Skaggs, Henry - Hyksos - 3.6

McManus, Hilton Referee

Any chance of posting lists? I am especially curious to see how people organized their NKE lists. I think NKE needs to be run very differently in FoG as opposed to DBM.

Inquiring minds,

Marc

babyshark wrote:Any chance of posting lists? I am especially curious to see how people organized their NKE lists. I think NKE needs to be run very differently in FoG as opposed to DBM.

I think one part is still the same. That it is a foot army supported by chariots and not the other way around.

The other issues seems to me is how do you blend sherden and bow. The drilled foot are probably OK in period, in an open they probably suffer.

You will have to bother Cary Grant for the lists. He was the ref and did not send such to me.

C

hazelbark wrote:

babyshark wrote:Any chance of posting lists? I am especially curious to see how people organized their NKE lists. I think NKE needs to be run very differently in FoG as opposed to DBM.

I think one part is still the same. That it is a foot army supported by chariots and not the other way around.

The other issues seems to me is how do you blend sherden and bow. The drilled foot are probably OK in period, in an open they probably suffer.

My impression was that the chariots were the arm of decision in most if not all instances. Whoever handled the chariots best won the game. This is based on glimpses rather than study though.

I was sort of busy getting run over by chariots.

Skullzgrinda wrote: My impression was that the chariots were the arm of decision in most if not all instances. Whoever handled the chariots best won the game. This is based on glimpses rather than study though.

I was sort of busy getting run over by chariots.

Well that makes sense, if both players emphaszied the chariots then they would be dominant.

I played NKE with the absolute Minimum of Chariots 2 bg;s of 4.
I then maxed out on Sea People. 2 x 20.
Gino
SMAC...ABB

kal5056 wrote:I played NKE with the absolute Minimum of Chariots 2 bg;s of 4.
I then maxed out on Sea People. 2 x 20.
Gino
SMAC...ABB

Good decision I think.

Gino and good decision....... Does not compute..does not compute..

Scrumpy wrote:Gino and good decision....... Does not compute..does not compute..

Scrumpy, Gino's loud and sustained bleating about being hapless, helpless, clueless and an easy meal for any roving predator or scavenger is utter bollocks.

It was all a prolonged setup, like an angler fish or Q ship.

Be warned! The man is not trustworthy.

A feigned flight, poisoned wells and tripwires behind his trail kind of guy whose belt now carries some impressive scalps.