Post Viking Scandanavians
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:58 am
Hi All,
I've been reading up on the Baltic Crusades and I'm interested to see that "[o]ne 13th century Swedish legal codex called the Upplandslagen specified that every footsoldier must be equipped with a shield, a sword, a helmet, a mail haulberk or other armour, and a bow with 36 arrows." Given that Norway and Sweden were more poorly equipped than Denmark I'm wondering about the leidang's rating in this list.
Now, I don't have much of a problem with the Offensive Spearmen rating (given their method of combat), and you have the option of using rear supporting Lights to give the '36 arrows' a mention, but shouldn't they be rated as, or have the option to rate as Armoured?
Additionally, the list's numbers are a bit off.
If you don't have rear supported Leidang you MUST be in BG's of 8, and the minimum number is 20. This should be errata'd to 24.
Thoughts?
I've been reading up on the Baltic Crusades and I'm interested to see that "[o]ne 13th century Swedish legal codex called the Upplandslagen specified that every footsoldier must be equipped with a shield, a sword, a helmet, a mail haulberk or other armour, and a bow with 36 arrows." Given that Norway and Sweden were more poorly equipped than Denmark I'm wondering about the leidang's rating in this list.
Now, I don't have much of a problem with the Offensive Spearmen rating (given their method of combat), and you have the option of using rear supporting Lights to give the '36 arrows' a mention, but shouldn't they be rated as, or have the option to rate as Armoured?
Additionally, the list's numbers are a bit off.
If you don't have rear supported Leidang you MUST be in BG's of 8, and the minimum number is 20. This should be errata'd to 24.
Thoughts?