Carthaginian Army
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:35 am
Well, It's me again, now with a new topic to discuss about the Carthaginian Army.
I see this army as a very versatile combined arms, with some very powerful units. Excellent skirmishers, pretty good line troops (the option to use Hannibal's veterans makes the African Spearmen one of the best line units in-period), and good cavalry, and well, of course Elephants.
With all this toys in the army, it seems difficult, at least for me, to decide which units to include in the army. Also, it may be difficult to find a place and a role for every BG in the army, as I see it, it's not an easy army to use. Easy armies are the ones with primarly one troop type, and very few supports, at least that's what I think... how do you see it? Easy or difficult army? An army for starers, for experts or equally good for both?
The option to include the Libyphoenician cavalry is really tempting, because of the Drilled thing, and of course, because it gives us the chance to get one more BG of Armoured guys, instead of more protected Gallic & Spaniards, so I think it's really worth it. But... were they used by Hannibal?
About elephants... well... I really DON'T like them
, so how do you see a Carthaginian army without this beasts? I know that Hannibal couldn't use them too much after he crossed the Alps, because many of this animals died, and of the 7 remaining, just one survived winter... so historicaly it would be accurate, and as I really don't like them, well, I wouldn't use them.
The Balearic Slingers are superior, my question is... is it worth to pay for that? Or is it better to get more javelinmen? I know it's Only 5 points each base, but well, maybe you have different opinions about this, or maybe not.
Would it be accurate to use them in the army of Hannibal's Vets? Or maybe just more javelinmen?
What about the Numidian guys? More Numidian Light Horse or more Spanish Light Horse? The same with the Javelinmen. Personally I really like the Spanish miniatures, but it would be a shame not to have a BG of Numidians, because they were really outstanding as skirmishers historically, and it would give more ethnic variety to the Carthaginian Army. And this variety is what it makes it great, at least for me
I've read that the Gauls that fought with Hannibal also stole a lot of Roman equipment after the battles (I even read that of the 20,000 Gallic warriors that Hannibal commanded, 6,000 were classified as "light infantry" but just because they didn't have chainmails or other stolen equipment... I think it was in one of Osprey Books, the one of the Punic Wars, of course), so why don't the veteran gauls get the option of being Armoured? At least just 0-8, or maybe even a smaller BG of 6? Anyway, I'd use this guys, as they're great shock troops, and add some nice colors to the army...
Well, so, ANY thoughts about this army, like how you've seen it being played, how you yourselves played with it, what do you focus on when you're making the army list, and everything else, would be really appreciated. I really like to learn more about the FoG armies (as you may have imagined
), and of course, the cultures and the history of this people 
I see this army as a very versatile combined arms, with some very powerful units. Excellent skirmishers, pretty good line troops (the option to use Hannibal's veterans makes the African Spearmen one of the best line units in-period), and good cavalry, and well, of course Elephants.
With all this toys in the army, it seems difficult, at least for me, to decide which units to include in the army. Also, it may be difficult to find a place and a role for every BG in the army, as I see it, it's not an easy army to use. Easy armies are the ones with primarly one troop type, and very few supports, at least that's what I think... how do you see it? Easy or difficult army? An army for starers, for experts or equally good for both?
The option to include the Libyphoenician cavalry is really tempting, because of the Drilled thing, and of course, because it gives us the chance to get one more BG of Armoured guys, instead of more protected Gallic & Spaniards, so I think it's really worth it. But... were they used by Hannibal?
About elephants... well... I really DON'T like them
The Balearic Slingers are superior, my question is... is it worth to pay for that? Or is it better to get more javelinmen? I know it's Only 5 points each base, but well, maybe you have different opinions about this, or maybe not.
Would it be accurate to use them in the army of Hannibal's Vets? Or maybe just more javelinmen?
What about the Numidian guys? More Numidian Light Horse or more Spanish Light Horse? The same with the Javelinmen. Personally I really like the Spanish miniatures, but it would be a shame not to have a BG of Numidians, because they were really outstanding as skirmishers historically, and it would give more ethnic variety to the Carthaginian Army. And this variety is what it makes it great, at least for me
I've read that the Gauls that fought with Hannibal also stole a lot of Roman equipment after the battles (I even read that of the 20,000 Gallic warriors that Hannibal commanded, 6,000 were classified as "light infantry" but just because they didn't have chainmails or other stolen equipment... I think it was in one of Osprey Books, the one of the Punic Wars, of course), so why don't the veteran gauls get the option of being Armoured? At least just 0-8, or maybe even a smaller BG of 6? Anyway, I'd use this guys, as they're great shock troops, and add some nice colors to the army...
Well, so, ANY thoughts about this army, like how you've seen it being played, how you yourselves played with it, what do you focus on when you're making the army list, and everything else, would be really appreciated. I really like to learn more about the FoG armies (as you may have imagined