Page 1 of 1

Charge declaration

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:22 pm
by list_lurker
Hi - should be an easy one...

In the charge declaration the target must be 'visible'. Does that 'visible to' apply to the charging BG? or is it just visible per se?

Ta

Simon

Re: Charge declaration

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:27 pm
by expendablecinc
list_lurker wrote:Hi - should be an easy one...
or is it just visible per se?
...
Are come other BGs of your opponent invisible per se? and how many points do they pay for this. I guess it wil save time painting.

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:34 pm
by list_lurker
Maybe I should clarify.

What I mean is that can I declare a charge if the target is blocked by friends (who you can interpenetrate legally)

It equally could apply to troops are in terrain that reduces visibilty. Where one BG can see them - but are 'invisible' to the the chargers becuase of distance

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:55 pm
by dave_r
You certainly can't charge through friends (even if you can legally interpenetrate them). You also have to be able to see your intended target.

Pg 47

"No interpenetrations are allowed when charging."

Pg 52

"To be allowed to declare a charge there must be a visible enemy that can be legally contacted"

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:06 pm
by list_lurker
To be allowed to declare a charge there must be a visible enemy that can be legally contacted

the key to this line is the context of the 'visibility', there is no implication of whether this applies to the 'charger'

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:13 pm
by nikgaukroger
list_lurker wrote:
To be allowed to declare a charge there must be a visible enemy that can be legally contacted

the key to this line is the context of the 'visibility', there is no implication of whether this applies to the 'charger'

If you'd quoted the whole sentance you'd see it goes on to say "... by the charging battle group ..." which, IMO, provides enough to say that the prospective charges must have visible enemy.

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:23 pm
by deadtorius
If you can't see it there is no incentive to charge it.
Battlegroups are not likely to want to just charge about the table hoping they migh run into something :?

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:34 pm
by Sadista
Battlegroups are not likely to want to just charge about the table hoping they migh run into something
There goes my impression of viking beserkers out the window :D

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:42 pm
by dave_r
Battlegroups are not likely to want to just charge about the table hoping they migh run into something
Well, there goes a load of wargamer's tactics out of the window then :)

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:47 pm
by list_lurker
"... by the charging battle group ..."
I thought that applied the 2nd element of the sentence - 'legally contacted by the charging element'

However, everyone thinks that the BG should be able to see to charge , so that good enough for me! :D

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:59 pm
by spikemesq
Also note that the rules for testing not to charge specify that shock troops must test not to charge enemy they could contact by interpenetrating friends but cannot voluntarily charge those targets.

Spike

Impact Phase is trivially easy.

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:20 pm
by david53
spikemesq wrote:
Impact Phase is trivially easy.
For wargamers :lol:

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:22 pm
by batesmotel
list_lurker wrote:Maybe I should clarify.

What I mean is that can I declare a charge if the target is blocked by friends (who you can interpenetrate legally)

It equally could apply to troops are in terrain that reduces visibilty. Where one BG can see them - but are 'invisible' to the the chargers becuase of distance
As far as I know, the rules don't specify anything about friends blocking visibility of enemy BGs. If they do block then it would have a major effect on shock troops testing not to charge or having to burst through friends.

Chris

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:47 pm
by list_lurker
Also note that the rules for testing not to charge specify that shock troops must test not to charge enemy they could contact by interpenetrating friends but cannot voluntarily charge those targets.
This does draw an interesting parallel.

I think the voluntary charge interpenetation is a neccessary evil to stop absusive use of LF ablative screens from shooting

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:22 am
by philqw78
spikemesq wrote:.........................
Spike

Impact Phase is trivially easy.
Hooray

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:23 pm
by deadtorius
I think the voluntary charge interpenetation is a neccessary evil to stop absusive use of LF ablative screens from shooting

You can't vluntarily charge through your friendly screen of light troops. Shock troops however might just lose it and go through them without thinking out the possible consequences. An odd situation where you might find your troops charging off through the light screen without orders but you can't order them to do the same thing.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 4:23 am
by expendablecinc
deadtorius wrote:I think the voluntary charge interpenetation is a neccessary evil to stop absusive use of LF ablative screens from shooting

You can't vluntarily charge through your friendly screen of light troops. Shock troops however might just lose it and go through them without thinking out the possible consequences. An odd situation where you might find your troops charging off through the light screen without orders but you can't order them to do the same thing.
It would be fun though if you wanted to simulate being a swine general. Just like letting you shoot at enemy in combat but rolling to see if the hits are on your BG or the enemy's.

Anthony