Page 1 of 1

HYW English - interpenetrations

Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:11 pm
by nickandmatt
HYW English Longbowmen & Dismounted Men at Arms are permitted to interpenetrate.

Can a longbow BG interpenetrate with another longbow BG ?

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:01 am
by philqw78
no

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:30 pm
by petedalby
harsh but true!

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 8:35 pm
by Skullzgrinda
Concise!

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:18 pm
by nickandmatt
Knickers!

(Excellent text economy gentlemen!) :D

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:13 am
by philqw78
I thoroughly enjoyed this thread.

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:50 pm
by madcam2us
Post padders!!!!
:evil:
:D

Madcam.

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:10 pm
by nikgaukroger
Definitely one of the most sensible and satisfying of recent times.

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:17 pm
by madaxeman
Contrary to popular belief, LH can't interpenetrate LB either.

But several blokes called Dave from Manchester think they should be able to.

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:23 pm
by david53
madaxeman wrote:Contrary to popular belief, LH can't interpenetrate LB either.

But several blokes called Dave from Manchester think they should be able to.

Its a pity you missed the middle period at derby you'd have loved all those LH chasing each other around the board, interpenetrating anything in sight as they should of course being proper troops and all :wink:

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:27 pm
by dave_r
Tim couldn't do that. Since it is a new period then he has to wait and see what is sucessful and then copy it ;)

Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:54 pm
by madaxeman
dave_r wrote:Tim couldn't do that. Since it is a new period then he has to wait and see what is sucessful and then copy it ;)
Don't you mean "copy it and win" Dave ?

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:18 am
by philqw78
madaxeman wrote:
dave_r wrote:Tim couldn't do that. Since it is a new period then he has to wait and see what is sucessful and then copy it ;)
Don't you mean "copy it and win" Dave ?
Meow.

You are dragging this out now guys. I thought this subject was done in 2 posts.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:16 pm
by petedalby
Me too.

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:53 pm
by dave_r
If it was done in two posts how come Phil has already made three separate postings on the matter?

Aha. Rumbled....

Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:05 pm
by deadtorius
To quote Monty Python: "Thats enough this is becoming silly!"