Page 1 of 1
Ad triarios redisse
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:41 pm
by CountBelisarius
Finally finished the
triarii for my second legion for Field of Glory. I started the legion back in 1994 so they've been a long time coming!
More pics on my blog
http://blog.belisarius.org.uk/2009/09/a ... disse.html
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:22 pm
by philqw78
A year a figure. Now thats dedication.
Not surprised that you didn't rush production of Romans through during the DBM period though.
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:15 pm
by CountBelisarius
Well, it was DBM that droveme away from Ancients, and FoG that is drawing me back in.
Hopefully the painting will proceed at a more productive rate now!
Andy
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:43 am
by Skullzgrinda
CountBelisarius wrote:Well, it was DBM that droveme away from Ancients, and FoG that is drawing me back in.
Hopefully the painting will proceed at a more productive rate now!
Andy
Funny you should say this. I called up several people just the other day in a state of sheer euphoria, because for the first time since '92 I was painting ancients, and painting them for an imminent tournament. I never played DBM. I was not enthused with WRG 7th but I could accept it. I enjoyed DBA for what it was but felt that it was too limited a framework to support large battles. When DBM came along I watched more than a few really large tournaments, to see if I really wanted to digest another set of rules. Everywhere I saw tortured, ridiculous deployments of historically insignificant armies, and banks of tables occupied by joyless players who looked as if they were doing tax returns. A floor of office cubicles looks more fun. I took a looong pass.
FoG has me back in the game.
I am with you, Count Belisarius!
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:49 pm
by CountBelisarius
I think the last tournament I played my opponent argued every single decision and tried to twist the rules so much that in the end I just said that if winning was so important he could have the game, and I just conceded. It really wasn't worth all the aggro. I play to enjoy the games, not to argue the whole time.
I was almost tempted by the FoG Tournament at Derby but can't guarantee how long I'll be there. Maybe next time...
Andy
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:49 pm
by camlan
Beautiful work Andy.
FoG has me painting 15mm stuff now............as much as I think the scale is a 'tweener'........its whats being played....
Dave
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:26 pm
by CountBelisarius
If starting afresh I'd go 10mm as there is nice stuff out there. But I'm too old to start entire armies/periods again in a new scale from scratch!
Andy
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:30 pm
by camlan
Yep.............me too..........10mm gives enough detail and you can get a real sense of mass...........
25/28mm for the skirmish type games.........10mm for mass battles is the way to go.
Dave
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:45 pm
by OldenTired
am thinking the same about 10mm.
and am painting some 28mm for those big games.
plenty of fun to be had.