Page 1 of 2
					
				Britcon Lists
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:18 am
				by madaxeman
				Phil Powell has already added his Britcon-winning Italian Ostrogoth list to the FoG Wiki - so you can see the deep thought behind it!
If anyone else wants to add their lists to the relevant pages, please do so ... 
http://www.madaxeman.com/wiki2/tiki-ind ... strogothic
(if you are using the Army List Builder excel spreadsheet the easiest way to do this is to insert another column into your spreadsheet at Column A, copy/insert asterisks ( * ) into each cell in the new column A, and the cut and paste all the cells with army data (ie not the headings) into the wiki. It looks a bit odd until you save it, but it looks fine in the saved version)
tim
 
			
					
				Re: Britcon Lists
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:30 am
				by philqw78
				madaxeman wrote:Phil Powell has already added his Britcon-winning Italian Ostrogoth list to the FoG Wiki - so you can see the deep thought behind it!
tim
  
  
So Wily you could pin a tail on it and call it a Coyote
Although I initially expected to end up at the bottom of the canyon people's disbelief of my army and game plan proved a massive advantage
 
			
					
				Re: Britcon Lists
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:36 am
				by timurilenk
				madaxeman wrote:(if you are using the Army List Builder excel spreadsheet the easiest way to do this is to insert another column into your spreadsheet at Column A, copy/insert asterisks ( * ) into each cell in the new column A, and the cut and paste all the cells with army data (ie not the headings) into the wiki. It looks a bit odd until you save it, but it looks fine in the saved version)
I tried it - seems to work OK
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:36 pm
				by JimmyThePict
				In case anyone is interested  
 
 
Early Picts @ Britcon 2009
	CiC	IC	-	-	-	-	-	-	CinC	1
	Troop Commander	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1
	Troop Commander	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1
	Saxon Troop Commander	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	Ally general	1
		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	
1	Archers	LF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	Bow	-	-	-	6
2	Javelinmen	LF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	Javelins	Light spear	-	-	6
3	Cavalry	LH	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	Javelins	Light spear	-	-	4
4	Chariots	LCh	-	Superior	Undrilled	-	Light spear	-	-	4
5	Spearmen 1	MF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	-	Offensive spearmen	Spearmen	-	8
6	Spearmen 2	MF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	-	Offensive spearmen	Spearmen	-	8
7	Spearmen 3	MF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	-	Offensive spearmen	Spearmen	-	8
8	Spearmen 4	MF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	-	Offensive spearmen	Spearmen	-	8
9	Spearmen 5	MF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	-	Offensive spearmen	Spearmen	-	8
10	Spearmen 6	MF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	-	Offensive spearmen	Spearmen	-	8
11	Spearmen 7	MF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	-	Offensive spearmen	Spearmen	-	8
12	Saxon Javelinmen	LF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	Javelins	Light spear	-	-	4
13	Saxon Nobles	HF	Protected	Superior	Undrilled	-	Impact foot	Swordsmen	-	4
14	Saxon Women	HF	Protected	Average	Undrilled	-	Impact foot	Swordsmen	-	8
15	Saxon Nobles	HF	Protected	Superior	Undrilled	-	Impact foot	Swordsmen	-	4
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:50 pm
				by philqw78
				JimmyThePict wrote:In case anyone is interested  
 
 
	-	4
14	Saxon Women	HF	Protected	Average	Undrilled	-	Impact foot	Swordsmen	-	8
 
I'm interested in this troop type 

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:07 pm
				by ethan
				I think the fortified camp thing might have legs.  Now that I think about it I can see it being useful in some circumstances that have caused me trouble in the past.
Even just deployed on the baseline (or near the baseline) as a pivot point it could be useful, after all the fortified camp doesn't suffer -1 for being near the board edge.  The relative difficulty of getting through it with mounted creates a fair amoutn of uncertainty on an opponent's part in trying to get through and around your flank, especially if you have some troops with missile weapons plinking away at the same time...
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:15 pm
				by philqw78
				ethan wrote:I think the fortified camp thing might have legs.  Now that I think about it I can see it being useful in some circumstances that have caused me trouble in the past.
Even just deployed on the baseline (or near the baseline) as a pivot point it could be useful, after all the fortified camp doesn't suffer -1 for being near the board edge.  The relative difficulty of getting through it with mounted creates a fair amoutn of uncertainty on an opponent's part in trying to get through and around your flank, especially if you have some troops with missile weapons plinking away at the same time...
Most troops also have the problem of getting stuck on it and charged in the flank or rear.  They could move away but none skirmishers would have to CMT and then, again, most troops could only turn to face.  So opponents race towards it and then wonder what to do once they get close.
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 5:03 pm
				by hazelbark
				This was one of the early roman player theories of how to use camps IIRC.
Personally I have generally found the CMT to stop looting easy to pass. But needing a 6 to bust in don't recall too many attempts
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:55 pm
				by richardcollins70
				hazelbark wrote:This was one of the early roman player theories of how to use camps IIRC.
Personally I have generally found the CMT to stop looting easy to pass. But needing a 6 to bust in don't recall too many attempts
Hmph well as my fortified camp fell twice at the first attempt Im strongly of the view a fortified camp is giving your opponent a 24 pt head start
Richard
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 8:14 pm
				by timurilenk
				richardcollins70 wrote:
Hmph well as my fortified camp fell twice at the first attempt Im strongly of the view a fortified camp is giving your opponent a 24 pt head start
Richard
Still managed to win the comp though richard!  

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:24 am
				by philqw78
				richardcollins70 wrote:hazelbark wrote:This was one of the early roman player theories of how to use camps IIRC.
Personally I have generally found the CMT to stop looting easy to pass. But needing a 6 to bust in don't recall too many attempts
Hmph well as my fortified camp fell twice at the first attempt Im strongly of the view a fortified camp is giving your opponent a 24 pt head start
Richard
 
It obviously did the job of distracting the enemy whilst you snuck up and hit him with the big brick that is MRR
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:21 pm
				by marshalney2000
				Norse Irish list from Britcon was:
IC plus 3 TCs ( one a Viking ally)
5 bgs of 6 LF ave Jls, LS
1 BG of 6 LF ave sling
4 BGs of 6 MF ave unpr HW
1 BG of 8 MF sup, unpr, HW
2 BGs of  8 HF, sup, unpr, HW
3 BGs of 8 HF, ave, prot, off spear (Vikings)
Hope this is of interest despite the lack of female units.
John
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:25 pm
				by jlopez
				And here are my almost-made-it-to-the-top War of the Roses Yorkist:
IC + 2 TCs
4 BGs of 8 Town and County Longbowmen Undrilled, protected, poor, longbow, swordsmen
2 BGs of 8 Retinue Longbowmen Drilled, protected, average, longbow, swordsmen
2 BGs of 6 Retinue Longbowmen Drilled, protected, average, longbow, swordsmen
2 BGs of 4 Retinue billmen Drilled, armoured, average, heavy weapon
2 BGs of 4 Retinue billmen Drilled, armoured, superior, heavy weapon
1 BG of 4 Mercenary handgunners Drilled, protected, average, firearm
And don't let anyone tell you poor troops are no good in a competition. My poor longbowmen overall turned out to be very stalwart yeomen indeed and probably routed more enemy BGs than the Retinue archers with their fancy manoeuvering. Based on this experience, next year I will probably use HYW (Britain) with all 52 poor archers. They'll be no stopping me then...
Julian
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:45 pm
				by Robert241167
				2 BGs of 5 Retinue billmen Drilled, armoured, superior, heavy weapon ????
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:00 pm
				by david53
				Robert241167 wrote:2 BGs of 5 Retinue billmen Drilled, armoured, superior, heavy weapon ????
Is that six not five
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:16 pm
				by jlopez
				david53 wrote:Robert241167 wrote:2 BGs of 5 Retinue billmen Drilled, armoured, superior, heavy weapon ????
Is that six not five
 
Edited to 4...Thanks.
Julian
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:20 pm
				by philqw78
				Looks like they're happy with you copying Tim.   
 
 
If I get some time tomorrow I'll paste a few over.  

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:15 am
				by madaxeman
				Managed to sneak those in myself.  

 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:37 pm
				by davidandlynda
				Here are the Late Serbs that placed 6th,Terrys in 3rd were quite different
IC and 2 TC's
4 x 6 LF bow undrilled poor
3 x 4 LH bow sword average
1 x 4 LH lance sword average
1 x 4 LH light spear sword bow average
4 x 4 KN heavy armoured,lance sword superior
1 x 6 mob
As with Julian my poor foot were the stars,does this mean they are to powerful 
 
 
David
 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:30 am
				by domblas
				hi,
i red phil italian ostrogothic army and am interetsted in using it. What command did he use? did he flank march with a TC or FC?
ur fogly