Page 1 of 2
					
				Medieval French
				Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:52 pm
				by timurilenk
				I am giving somebody a practice game on Thursday against HYW English.
I thought I would try our Medieval French and am playing around with a list:
1 IC + 3 TC
6 BG of 4 Superior Kn
1 BG of 6 MF crossbows
1 BG 12 Mob
What do you think?
Will this have a chance or should I drop[ some knights for filler?
Thanks
Ian
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:21 pm
				by madcam2us
				Not sure if the below will show up as intended, but this is what I'm considering giving a go.,...
1	Ribauds, pillards, peasant levies	MB	Poor	Undrilled	Unprotected	-	-	-	-	8
2	Spanish Xbow	LF	Average	Undrilled	Unprotected	Crossbow	-	-	-	6
3	French Archers	MF	Poor	Undrilled	Unprotected	Longbow	-	-	-	4
4	French Men-at-Arms	Kn	Average	Undrilled	Heavily Armoured	-	Lancer	Swordsmen	-	4
5	French Men-at-Arms	Kn	Average	Undrilled	Heavily Armoured	-	Lancer	Swordsmen	-	4
6	French Xbow	MF	Average	Undrilled	Protected	Crossbow	-	-	-	6
7	French Xbow	MF	Average	Undrilled	Protected	Crossbow	-	-	-	6
8	Voulgiers	HF	Average	Drilled	Armoured	-	-	Heavy Weapon	-	8
9	Mercenary men-at-arms	Kn	Average	Drilled	Heavily Armoured	-	Lancer	Swordsmen	-	4
10	Scottish Archers	MF	Average	Undrilled	Protected	Longbow	-	Swordsmen	-	8
11	Scottish Archers	MF	Average	Undrilled	Protected	Longbow	-	Swordsmen	-	8
12	Scottish men-at-arms	HF	Average	Undrilled	Armoured	-	-	Heavy Weapon	-	6
	 	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
		IC	-	-	-	-	-	-	C-in-C	1
		TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2
	Scottish Allied General	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	Ally General	1
Madcam.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:27 am
				by timurilenk
				Thanks for the list Madcam.
I guess we are at opposite ends of the spectrum!  
 
For me the French are about the superior knights - I fear I might have over done it and should add some filler. Your version seems to have taken the opposite approach and made it something of a combined arms army.
Are you intending to use your knights dismounted?
Ian
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:25 am
				by christospap
				Hey everyone,
Here is the list that I have found suits my game style. It follows the same approach as Madcam's, however it avoids using 4s of Average Knights (especially because it used to, and got beaten everytime).
6 Average Protected Undrilled Crossbows
8 Poor Protected Drilled Crossbows
6 Average Armored Drilled Heavy Weapon Voulgiers
8 Average Heavily Armored Undrilled Heavy Weapon Scotts
6 Average Protected Undrilled Swordsmen
4 Poor Unprotected Undrilled French Longbowmen
6 Average Protected Undrilled Scottish Longbow-Swordsmen
6 Average Protected Undrilled Swordsmen
6 Average Protected Undrilled Scottish Longbow-Swordsmen
6 Average Unprotected Undrilled LF Spanish Crossbowmen
4 Average Armoured Undrilled Lancer-Swordsmen Cavalry
4 Superior Heavily Armoured Undrilled Lancer-Swordsmen Knights
4 Superior Heavily Armoured Undrilled Lancer-Swordsmen Knights
I usually accompany all that with a decent amount of terrain, leaving the open spaces for my Knights and HF.
Again, this suits my gameplay and my need to have some kind of response against the widest possible range of foes.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:45 am
				by timurilenk
				christospap wrote:Again, this suits my gameplay and my need to have some kind of response against the widest possible range of foes.
I guess I am in a minority then.  
 
You are both probably right, the notion of an army almost entirely of Kn S is perhaps too romantic or fool hardy - I must admit 8 BGs total in the army is not so much!
I will try to pen a list later that comes more in your direction.
Ian
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:16 am
				by grahambriggs
				timurilenk wrote:christospap wrote:Again, this suits my gameplay and my need to have some kind of response against the widest possible range of foes.
I guess I am in a minority then.  
 
You are both probably right, the notion of an army almost entirely of Kn S is perhaps too romantic or fool hardy - I must admit 8 BGs total in the army is not so much!
I will try to pen a list later that comes more in your direction.
Ian
 
I would try yours first and see how it works - it moight be the new wonder army. I'm not sure what value the IC adds though - if it were me I'd take all TCs and perhaps you could then afford some more filler.
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:05 pm
				by dave_r
				I think that the French army should be based around Superior Knights.  I have tried the Scottish allies with longbow, but they haven't worked 

  The purpose of the Generals in a french army is to fight - there is no need for an IC 
Here is my latest iteration
4 x TC's
5 x 4 Superior Knights, Undrilled, Heavily Armoured, Lancer, Swordsmen
1x6 MF, Crossbow, Protected, Average, Undrilled, Crossbow
1x8 Mob, Poor
1x4 Cavalry, Armoured, Average, Undrilled, Lancer, Swordsmen
1x6 LF, Average, Undrilled, Unprotected, Crossbow
1x4 MF, Poor, Undrilled, Unprotected, Longbow
1x6 LF, Average, Undrilled, Unprotected, Javelin, Light Spear
1x2 Light Artillery
800 points on the nose with 12 BG's
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:15 pm
				by madcam2us
				timurilenk wrote:Thanks for the list Madcam.
I guess we are at opposite ends of the spectrum!  
 
For me the French are about the superior knights - I fear I might have over done it and should add some filler. Your version seems to have taken the opposite approach and made it something of a combined arms army.
Are you intending to use your knights dismounted?
Ian
 
Depends, obviously on the opponent.  But yes, I chose them average in order to save points and still get to dismount as supeior HF. 
I think the Serbs would do better as a Kn heavy list as they get loads of lance armed LH and shed loads of bow armed LF.
with only 8 BGs you don't need 4 generals.
Madcam.
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:15 pm
				by vercingetorix
				hello timurilenk,
You are correct in saying that the superior knights are the biggest strength of the french, and depening on who you face, this list could work.
Are you building this army to face a particular opponent, because if you brought this list against 100 year war english, you would probably be slaughtered.
Automatically, I would suggest going up to 8 bases of xbow and getting the 8 volgiurs.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:55 pm
				by timurilenk
				Thanks all for the input, I think my list is too brittle with just  8 BGs
I like your list Dave, though I am thinking of going average and dismounting.
Ian
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:08 am
				by Ghaznavid
				dave_r wrote:
Here is my latest iteration
4 x TC's
5 x 4 Superior Knights, Undrilled, Heavily Armoured, Lancer, Swordsmen
1x6 MF, Crossbow, Protected, Average, Undrilled, Crossbow
1x8 Mob, Poor
1x4 Cavalry, Armoured, Average, Undrilled, Lancer, Swordsmen
1x6 LF, Average, Undrilled, Unprotected, Crossbow
1x4 MF, Poor, Undrilled, Unprotected, Longbow
1x6 LF, Average, Undrilled, Unprotected, Javelin, Light Spear
1x2 Light Artillery
I think that list isn't valid. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the LF with Javelin looks like Bidets, which are available only before 1400, the Cv however is only available after 1400.
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:58 am
				by timurilenk
				I am now going for the opposite extreme and going for foot:
CIC	IC	-	-	-	-	-	-	CinC	1
Sub General	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2
Scots Ally General	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	Ally general	1
Ribauds, pillards, peasant levy	Mob	Unprotected	Poor	Undrilled	-	-	-	-	12
Bidets	LF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	Javelins	Light spear	-	-	4
Scottish archers	MF	Unprotected	Poor	Undrilled	Longbow	-	Swordmen	-	4
Scottish archers	MF	Unprotected	Poor	Undrilled	Longbow	-	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
Voulgiers	HF	Armoured	Average	Drilled	-	Heavy weapon	Heavy weapon	-	6
Scottish men-at arms	HF	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Heavy weapon	Heavy weapon	-	4
Scottish men-at arms	HF	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Heavy weapon	Heavy weapon	-	4
French crossbowmen	MF	Protected	Average	Undrilled	Crossbow	-	-	-	6
The game is tonight - I will see what happens
Ian
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:21 am
				by dave_r
				I think that list isn't valid 
Erm, so it isn't... Next Iteration:
4 x TC's
5 x 4 Superior Knights, Undrilled, Heavily Armoured, Lancer, Swordsmen
1x6 MF, Crossbow, Protected, Average, Undrilled, Crossbow
1x6 MF, Crossbow, Protected, Poor, Undrilled, Crossbow
1x8 Mob, Poor
1x4 Cavalry, Armoured, Average, Undrilled, Lancer, Swordsmen
1x4 LF, Average, Undrilled, Unprotected, Crossbow
1x4 MF, Poor, Undrilled, Unprotected, Longbow
1x2 Light Artillery
796 points at 12 BG's
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:27 am
				by Ghaznavid
				timurilenk wrote:
Bidets	LF	Unprotected	Average	Undrilled	Javelins	Light spear	-	-	4
Voulgiers	HF	Armoured	Average	Drilled	-	Heavy weapon	Heavy weapon	-	6
Similar problem it appears, Bidets (only before 1400) and Voulgiers (only from 1400) can not be in the same list.
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:29 pm
				by dave_r
				I would also question that you have 13 BG's, but four are allied - leaving 9 BG's with three generals.
I have tried the Scots on numerous occasions, but the average troops with one general who cannot be commited to combat means they are a liability.  Even the four Heavily Armoured Heavy Weapons Guys.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:02 pm
				by madcam2us
				larger BGs for the Scots to offset their "average-ness" even if this means less total BGs helps mitigate the lone commander, IMO.
Madcam.
			 
			
					
				Med French
				Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 3:22 pm
				by christospap
				dave_r wrote:I would also question that you have 13 BG's, but four are allied - leaving 9 BG's with three generals.
I have tried the Scots on numerous occasions, but the average troops with one general who cannot be commited to combat means they are a liability.  Even the four Heavily Armoured Heavy Weapons Guys.
That's true in my case Dave, and it actually has been tricky using the allied general effectively, since he has to take care of troops that I rarely use in the same area of the battlefield (the slow heavy fighters work best for me in the center, unlike the longbowmen).
The only remedy I have found is to field the longbows late enough, facing a convenient enemy or covering a suitable part of the battlefield (as far as terrain goes), thus diminishing the possibility of needing the general with the longbows, and so I have him join the heavy weapons.
Christos
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:35 pm
				by timurilenk
				Thanks for all the help - I have made larger BGs of Scots and got rid of the IC - I am going to use the list below now:
CIC	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	CinC	1
Sub General	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2
Scots Ally General	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	Ally general	1
Ribauds, pillards, peasant levy	Mob	Unprotected	Poor	Undrilled	-	-	-	-	12
French crossbowmen	MF	Protected	Average	Undrilled	Crossbow	-	-	-	6
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
Volgiers	HF	Armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	8
Scottish men-at arms	HF	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Heavy weapon	Heavy weapon	-	8
Scottish archers	MF	Protected	Average	Undrilled	Longbow	-	Swordmen	-	6
Scottish archers	MF	Protected	Average	Undrilled	Longbow	-	Swordmen	-	6
This should be enough HF for those pesky English  
 
Ian
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:40 pm
				by timurilenk
				Post script:
Used the list below:
CIC	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	CinC	1
Sub General	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2
Scots Ally General	TC	-	-	-	-	-	-	Ally general	1
Ribauds, pillards, peasant levy	Mob	Unprotected	Poor	Undrilled	-	-	-	-	8
Scottish archers	MF	Protected	Average	Undrilled	Longbow	-	Swordmen	-	6
Scottish archers	MF	Protected	Average	Undrilled	Longbow	-	Swordmen	-	6
Scottish men-at arms	HF	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Heavy weapon	Heavy weapon	-	8
French crossbowmen	MF	Protected	Average	Undrilled	Crossbow	-	-	-	6
Volgiers	HF	Armoured	Average	Drilled	-	Heavy weapon	Heavy weapon	-	6
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
French men-at-arms	Kn	Heavily armoured	Average	Undrilled	-	Lancers	Swordmen	-	4
The one above was incorrect.
Managed to get a fairly open table but with some Enclosed fields just in my half of the table. the Scottish longbows went in there to benefit from cover in the bow fight.
The HF went down in the middle butted up to this and walked through the English 
et Voila!!  
 
The list was good against English, not so sure it would fare well against a variety of opponents though.
Thanks to all who helped in moving me from my initial thought of a massed superior Knight charge to this option.
Looks like the rules work as they should historically for these armies - nice to know!!  
 
Ian
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 1:14 pm
				by dave_r
				Since the majority of later lists comprise some Superior Knights I would be interested to see how you fare against a more "typical" medieval army, rather than beating up innocent defenceless Longbowmen 
