Page 1 of 1

Ancient Britons 600 points -any good ?

Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:28 am
by Keith
Well I've dropped my chariots now , at 600 points I can't find a spot for them , how does this list look ?
10 Battlegroups.




CinC TC - - - - - - CinC 1
Troop Commander TC - - - - - - - 3
Elite Warriors MF Protected Elite Undrilled - Impact foot Swordmen - 8
Warriors MF Protected Average Undrilled - Impact foot Swordmen - 8
Warriors MF Protected Average Undrilled - Impact foot Swordmen - 8
Warriors MF Protected Average Undrilled - Impact foot Swordmen - 8
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 6
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 6
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 6
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 6
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 6
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 6
Light Horse LH Unprotected Average Undrilled Javelins Light spear - - 4
Light Horse LH Unprotected Average Undrilled Javelins Light spear - - 4






So the above army with no Chariots or perhaps a single unit as I have here ?
12 Battlegroups


CinC TC - - - - - - CinC 1
Troop Commander TC - - - - - - - 3
Elite Warriors MF Protected Elite Undrilled - Impact foot Swordmen - 8
Warriors MF Protected Average Undrilled - Impact foot Swordmen - 8
Warriors MF Protected Average Undrilled - Impact foot Swordmen - 8
Warriors MF Protected Average Undrilled - Impact foot Swordmen - 8
Light Chariots LCh - Superior Undrilled - Light spear - - 4
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 8
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 8
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 6
Skirmishers LF Unprotected Average Undrilled Sling - - - 6
Light Horse LH Unprotected Average Undrilled Javelins Light spear - - 4

Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:26 pm
by DaiSho
They look good Keith.

BG's of 6 skirmishers are 'risky' in that it is easy to get 1hp3 to cause a test, however since you have so many of the blighters it's likely they will tag team anyway.

I'd say it looks solid.

You'll have a less than happy time against shooty cavalry armies I believe, and so think that an IC might be worth the investment, but I'm sold on IC's so...

Ian

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:25 pm
by nikgaukroger
IMO it is asking for the enemy to avoid the MF if he wants and go for the rest and break the army by killing soft targets (assuming his is an army that can chase the lights of course). I may be woefully missing the point of it but it screams "victim" at me against too many other armies I'm afraid :?

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:39 pm
by Keith
nikgaukroger wrote:IMO it is asking for the enemy to avoid the MF if he wants and go for the rest and break the army by killing soft targets (assuming his is an army that can chase the lights of course). I may be woefully missing the point of it but it screams "victim" at me against too many other armies I'm afraid :?
You may be right , but the light foot can run through the MF and so the MF will be able to grab anything that comes near the LF , depending on the MF wanting to do that , there are so many bad match ups for the MF warriors as well.