Page 5 of 34

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:25 am
by hugh2711
I extract the files for the afrika corps extended but i cant seem to find the installation of afrika corps to overwrite. where exactly are the afrika corps files that i overwrite?. I have all the other games/dlc's and i dont want to overwrite any of those. thanks for info

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:25 am
by Magic1111
nikivdd wrote:Per request

Afrika Korps Extended.
Afrika Korps - extended.rar
Includes a new opening scenario with the three suggested heroes, also in German language. In second mission you can purchase and deploy the units of your preference.

For now only a small zip file, the complete package will be available as soon as i have finished all AK scenarios.
Important!

Credits

The Idea for the 3 special heroes for the start scenario comes from "Anduril" from german DMP Forum!

He deserves the thanks for the idea, I posted this only as a suggestion!

Best regards,
Magic

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:12 am
by Magic1111
hugh2711 wrote:I extract the files for the afrika corps extended but i cant seem to find the installation of afrika corps to overwrite. where exactly are the afrika corps files that i overwrite?. I have all the other games/dlc's and i dont want to overwrite any of those. thanks for info
You can use JSGME MOD Enabler, please read this post:

http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 65#p593165

And this:

http://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtop ... 47&t=27158

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:34 am
by hugh2711
thank you for your reply but i do not wish to use JGME. all other mods i have used (including the GC39 mod) by overwriting the relevant files. Is this mod for use with JGME ONLY?

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:41 am
by nikivdd
hugh2711 wrote:thank you for your reply but i do not wish to use JGME. all other mods i have used (including the GC39 mod) by overwriting the relevant files. Is this mod for use with JGME ONLY?
Hell no.
The Afrika Korps scenario files are located in the Panzer Corps\Data folder, the campaign.pzdat file as well.
As i wrote before, i made a back-up of the Panzer Corps\Data folder before overwriting scenario files and the campaign file by their revisioned versions.

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:44 am
by nikivdd
Per request

GC 40: https://www.sendspace.com/file/pkpk09

Sedan with correct hero name

GC 44: https://www.sendspace.com/file/te9xx1

Korsun pocket with correct hero names

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 11:00 am
by hugh2711
thank you and thank you for your excellent work.

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:05 pm
by Magic1111
hugh2711 wrote:thank you for your excellent work.
From me too Nico! :D

Image

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:54 pm
by Ralle
Yeah thank you very much for your efforts.

Maybe in the Oslo scenario in GC39 you could change the name of the ship you have to save from "KMS Blücher" to "Blücher". German ships at that time had no such prefixes.

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:28 pm
by Magic1111
Ralle wrote: Maybe in the Oslo scenario in GC39 you could change the name of the ship you have to save from "KMS Blücher" to "Blücher". German ships at that time had no such prefixes.
Yes, very good suggestion! :D

Or as Name "Schwerer Kreuzer Blücher"!

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:36 am
by nikivdd
I'm not going to change the names of the German ships in the Oslo mission, because it is going to break the victory conditions; this is not the intention of this revision.

Afrika Korps continued.

Alam Halfa

Two Hur Mk.I -> Beaufighter Mk.I
Blenheim Mk.I -> Wellington Mk.III
Daimler Dingo -> Daimler AC
QF 3 inch -> Vickers AA
Whitley Mk.V -> Halifax Mk.II
Added Axis captured 40 mm SPAA
Added transport to Italian artillery
Italian 47/32 M35 AT -> captured 2pdr Portee
Two American bombers -> British bombers
Two British propelled artillery -> self-propelled artillery
Alam Halfa.rar
(12.49 KiB) Downloaded 238 times
Suez Canal

Two British propelled AA -> self-propelled AA
Cruiser Mk.IV -> Sherman Mk.I
Rolls Royce AC -> Humber AC
Blenheim Mk.I -> Mosquito Mk.IV
6 pdr AT -> 6 pdr portee
Suez Canal.rar
(13.23 KiB) Downloaded 241 times
To be continued

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:35 am
by Ralle
Sad. That`s a bit hard to understand. You remade the first scenario from scratch. But giving the ship it`s correct name would break the Oslo scenario?
It`s ok though if it`s simply not possible. I thought it`s just about deleting the three letters.

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:04 pm
by nikivdd
Ralle wrote:Sad. That`s a bit hard to understand. You remade the first scenario from scratch. But giving the ship it`s correct name would break the Oslo scenario?
It`s ok though if it`s simply not possible. I thought it`s just about deleting the three letters.
Okay, you're right, i'll make the necessary changes and post.
Oslo.rar
(7.97 KiB) Downloaded 229 times
KMS has been removed, also from the auxiliary ships.
Could someone play and let me know if a decisive outcome (Blücher is not destroyed) is still working.

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:16 pm
by Ralle
Thanks.
Later I should have time to test it. I`ll report back then.

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 2:24 pm
by Ralle
I tested it. DV is still possible. The scenario works fine except for that annoying slowdown bug. But that`s another problem.
I don`t remember that other ships had that "KMS" too. But thanks for removing it.

What should "KMS" stand for anyway? As I don`t know this prefix. Ships of the German Empire had "SMS" which equals the British "HMS". And ships of the Third Reich had no prefix at all.

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:10 pm
by Cortilein
Ralle wrote:What should "KMS" stand for anyway? As I don`t know this prefix. Ships of the German Empire had "SMS" which equals the British "HMS". And ships of the Third Reich had no prefix at all.
I guess it is kind of made up. "KM" stands for "Kriegsmarine" (literally "War Navy"), the German Naval branch of the Wehrmacht. The "S" stands for "Schiff" (= ship), as in SMS ("Seiner Majestät Schiff" = His Majesty's Ship). Somebody thought he could glue those two together to make a new abbreviation. To my knowledge, the German ships of WW2 did not have any such prefix, as Ralle has correctly stated. I'm not even sure if "KM" was an official abbreviation: In "OKM" (= "Oberkommando der Marine"; High Command of the Navy), the "K" stands for "Kommando", not for the "Kriegs-" prefix. So it seems correct to get rid of "KMS" altogether.

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:14 pm
by Magic1111
Many thanks for continued AK and change the name of the Blücher Nico! :D

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:25 am
by nvett
Just a quick query are the files in the first post always the most up to date?

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:31 am
by nikivdd
nvett wrote:Just a quick query are the files in the first post always the most up to date?
Yes :)

Afrika Korps (and the version with the extra scenario) will appear in the first post too, as soon as i have done all scenarios; for the time being as lose posts in this thread.

Re: GC DLCs upgrade project (new Poznan GC 39 scenario!)

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:33 am
by nikivdd
Ralle wrote:I tested it. DV is still possible. The scenario works fine except for that annoying slowdown bug. But that`s another problem.
I don`t remember that other ships had that "KMS" too. But thanks for removing it.
Thanks for your help.