Page 5 of 27
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:57 am
by Xiccarph
petergarnett wrote:Thanks Ryan - I always need both start & end strengths.
Doh!
The battlefield resembled a football pitch more than a battle field. Rowdy fans kept getting tasered and removed from the field. It was hell I tell you.
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 12:04 pm
by pantherboy
Versus Parthia
Empire of Panthers invades Parthia and is victorious in Darhae. Awaiting word if they will surrender.
Parthia 30000 men / 12952 casualties / (39 from 37 BG's)
Empire of Panthers 56500 men / 8762 casualties / (27 from 70 BG's)
Twilight in Parthia
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 1:01 pm
by iversonjm
The Crimean Horde encounters light resistance in Bactria and conquers it.
Crimea 50000/4603, 62/21 WIN
Parthia 31500/11368, 39/41 LOSS
Province is ceded. The Horde will move on to Khorasan as soon as reduced numbers are calculated.
The Horde Advances Into Carthage
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 2:13 am
by iversonjm
Carthage 43/42 LOSS
36560/16995
Crimea 15/56 WIN
39500/6999
Carthage cedes the province to Crimea as resistance collapses.
The Horde pauses to roast elephant steaks on its lance tips while contemplating its next target....
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 5:59 am
by Scarz
Battle: El Paso
Attacker: Xiccarph
Defender: Scar
Defender results: Win
Initial Army Size: 30,000
Losses: 7,047
Attacker results: Lost
Initial Army Size: 34,000
Losses: 9,991
*El Paso holds out again, will the third time be a charm the evil Eupatorians?
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:04 am
by Scarz
Battle: Syria
Attacker: Scar
Defender: Xiccarph
Defender results: Won
Initial Army Size: 34,500
Losses: 12,650
Attacker results: Lost
Initial Army Size: 29,000
Losses: 11,413
*The Texans don't care much for the Syrian spirits, and lacking their Coors Light, perform poorly.
Re: Twilight in Parthia
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 11:26 am
by iversonjm
Province is ceded. The Horde will move on to Khorasan as soon as reduced numbers are calculated.[/quote]
I see from the map that Khorasan has just disappeared. I guess we are currently fighting over the capital at Sakastan then.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 11:27 am
by hidde
Caanan vs Rhodes
Battle of Pirate Harbor
Attacker:ianiow(Ptolemaic)
41500/17467 - 41/41 - LOSE
Defender:hidde(Judean)
45500/16735 - 42/56 - WIN
Canaan vs Armenia
Battle of Siyanu
Attacker:iandavidsmith(Armenian)
41000/14702 - 51/47 - LOSE
Defender:hidde(Judean)
46000/16007 - 38/54 - WIN
The anti-Canaan coalition has yet to win any laurel from the battlefields.
Listen to the wise and mercifull Canaan king:
Go home, lick your wounds and perhaps we will spare your lands from invasion and mayhem!

Re: Twilight in Parthia
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 1:39 pm
by pantherboy
iversonjm wrote:Province is ceded. The Horde will move on to Khorasan as soon as reduced numbers are calculated.
I see from the map that Khorasan has just disappeared. I guess we are currently fighting over the capital at Sakastan then.[/quote]
Due to a mix up with the map Khorasan has actually already been conquered by The Empire of the Panther.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 1:57 pm
by iversonjm
Yup. I think its all straightened out now.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 2:46 pm
by batesmotel
So who is besieging the Parthian capitol? Inquiring minds want to know? Maybe Crimea and the Panthers should have a duel to determine who gets the honor?
Setback in Canaan
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 2:49 pm
by iandavidsmith
The King of Armenia announces a slight setback in Canaan , our great Armenian Troops after inflicting terrible casualties on the feeble Canaan forces where forced into a slight disarray when the chef back at base camp accidentally announced Afternoon Tea. Unfortunately all of my light spear decided to partake in said "tea" and quickly left the battlefield.
Naturally camp chef has been executed and replaced with a Lama.
We re-group on the battlefield for round 2 unless Canaan wants to withdraw of course
Tigranes the Great
(aka stalwart opponent)
Battle:Siyanu
Attacker: Armenian (15)
Defender: Canaan (14)
Defender results: Win
Initial Army Size: 46,000
Losses: 16,007
AP results 38/51
Attacker results: Lost
Initial Army Size: 41,000
Losses: 14,702
AP results 51/47
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 5:14 pm
by iversonjm
batesmotel wrote:So who is besieging the Parthian capitol? Inquiring minds want to know? Maybe Crimea and the Panthers should have a duel to determine who gets the honor?
I think that's me. At least it is if the map is right.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 5:42 pm
by ianiow
hidde wrote:Caanan vs Rhodes
Battle of Pirate Harbor
Attacker:ianiow(Ptolemaic)
41500/17467 - 41/41 - LOSE
Defender:hidde(Judean)
45500/16735 - 42/56 - WIN
The anti-Canaan coalition has yet to win any laurel from the battlefields.
Listen to the wise and mercifull Canaan king:
Go home, lick your wounds and perhaps we will spare your lands from invasion and mayhem!

Bah! You got lucky. As we speak I have issued the order to chain together my pikemen at the ankles so they cant charge off. Next time you will have to fight them all at once! They know that if they dont reclaim the harbour this time, I wont allow them to watch the World Cup in June.
(I believe I have one final attempt at reclaiming my harbour? Will PM Peter to see how many troops are left. It good close fight! and a deserved victory. Congrats Hidde)
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 11:24 pm
by Morbio
Morbious vs Blathergutria
Battle of Misratah
Attacker: Morbio (Seleucid)
12,610/43,000 - 19/39 - WIN
Defender: Blathergut (Ptolemaic)
55,000/20,972 - 50/49 - LOSE
Pharaoh Blathergut was last seen riding through a screen of bubbles into the sunset. Emperor Morbio waits to see if the Pharaoh can raise and army from the remnants of the battle to continue to contest the province.
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 4:17 am
by Xiccarph
Scar wrote:Battle: El Paso
Attacker: Xiccarph
Defender: Scar
Defender results: Win
Initial Army Size: 30,000
Losses: 7,047
Attacker results: Lost
Initial Army Size: 34,000
Losses: 9,991
*El Paso holds out again, will the third time be a charm the evil Eupatorians?
I may be mistaken, perhaps Peter can clarify when he is able, but since you won two battles the province is yours and I must withdraw.
Am I interpreting this correctly?
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 4:37 am
by Xiccarph
Scar wrote:Battle: Syria
Attacker: Scar
Defender: Xiccarph
Defender results: Won
Initial Army Size: 34,500
Losses: 12,650
Attacker results: Lost
Initial Army Size: 29,000
Losses: 11,413
*The Texans don't care much for the Syrian spirits, and lacking their Coors Light, perform poorly.
Since we have each won a battle here, a third should decide who gets this provice if I am interpreting the campaign guidelines correctly, am I?
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 10:59 am
by petergarnett
Xiccarph wrote:Scar wrote:Battle: El Paso
Attacker: Xiccarph
Defender: Scar
Defender results: Win
Initial Army Size: 30,000
Losses: 7,047
Attacker results: Lost
Initial Army Size: 34,000
Losses: 9,991
*El Paso holds out again, will the third time be a charm the evil Eupatorians?
I may be mistaken, perhaps Peter can clarify when he is able, but since you won two battles the province is yours and I must withdraw.
Am I interpreting this correctly?
Attacker may withdraw - for all we know one of you may have events about to be played. Only rule is if an attackers wins twice defender MUST withdraw. However if the attacker, in a poor state, sits there refusing to withdraw the defender just issues a challenge to finish him off.
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 11:03 am
by petergarnett
Results noted to here
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 6:17 pm
by Xiccarph
Scar wrote:Battle: Syria
Attacker: Scar
Defender: Xiccarph
Defender results: Won
Initial Army Size: 34,500
Losses: 12,650
Attacker results: Lost
Initial Army Size: 29,000
Losses: 11,413
*The Texans don't care much for the Syrian spirits, and lacking their Coors Light, perform poorly.
The Battle for Syria challenge is up same password as last time.