Slitherine

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2024 8:48 pm Correct. My thought is, what if Belarus invades Poland without Russian support. And Poland defends itself without help from the USA. All fictitious in my head...ideas. Another ...Hungary vs Romania... Title: "Dispute between friends"

Just as long as Poland doesn't attack Belarus first )))) Even though the plots are fictional but don't stray too far from realism )
https://www.belvpo.com/у-поляков-все-го ... ению-стра/

Mission Olympic seemed to me simple already for such a master as you for I know you sometimes can create masterpieces now )))) I was able to take all the important points with the Americans and the Russians )) But they always write the USA won )))) I think it would be much more interesting if the U.S. for example attacked Honduras or Panama and they were opposed by military advisers from Russia or Cuba (perhaps a limited military contingent as in Venezuela ) well as local troops ) The rest of the screenshots for both sides ))))

Ok, it was just an attempt, I'll file it under "That was probably nothing".
But I'll put the card in the archive.

I am currently working on the 3rd scenario. Kurds vs IS

Funny situation playing for the Croats the game ended with the Polish herd appearing to help me ) ) Playing for Serbs Romanians and Poles appeared as opponents but the game was interrupted )))) I have to translate what exactly the command wants from me)))))








Ah that's the thing flights are forbidden but then how can I stop the Croats and Poles with such a meagre Serbian force )))) We can only hold the defence there, but we can't go on the offensive.)















All I replayed this map on the side of the Serbs and did not bomb cities and won it is not difficult if you do not rush and destroy the enemy methodically ) Great mission but on the same Serbian side)))))

Very well done, so for an experienced strategist it doesn't make a big difference whether enemies in the city can be attacked with airplanes or not, so the influence of the fighter planes is not so strong. However, it is sometimes this last stubborn strength point of a unit or burrow level etc. that brings down an aircraft when attacking the unit in the city.

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2024 5:32 pm Very well done, so for an experienced strategist it doesn't make a big difference whether enemies in the city can be attacked with airplanes or not, so the influence of the fighter planes is not so strong. However, it is sometimes this last stubborn strength point of a unit or burrow level etc. that brings down an aircraft when attacking the unit in the city.

Yes for Serbs you can win there, for Croats and their allies there is nothing to capture and to repel the attack of Serbs under the control of naive AI is a simple matter )))))














Didn't quite understand this mission on the side of Poland )))) I was repulsing tank attacks of Belarusians with my foot infantry they have no RPGs and paratroopers and it turns into a tedious process of trampling on the place when capturing empty Belarusian cities there were hordes of hordes that appeared from nowhere and became more and more ))))) This is all with complete domination of the enemy in the air )))) I will have to translate to myself what they want from me ))))






Oh what an exciting plot )))Belovostok must be held by the forces that are in the city )) And paratroopers should be landed to hunt for S-400 complexes ))))) I even with the paratroopers could barely cope with this horde of Belarusians )))) I have to play for them and see how I myself will quickly crush the masses of Poles ))

Correct. You have to search for and capture the S-400 system with the special forces south of Bialystok. With this system, they are able to stand up to the enemy bombers. This is followed by counter-attacks by the Belarusians because they want to get the S-400 back or at least destroy it. As soon as the reinforcements arrive, they liberate Bialystok and advance against the enemy. That was my plan. You're supposed to follow orders, haven't we been over this before?

What should I do with you? You play both sides. So now I plan differently. The opponents only appear with triggers as soon as you've marched close enough, otherwise you'll have 10,000 soldiers at the start with the side that's not actually playing the scenario and you'll flatten everything. I can build simple scenarios, set up an army, let it ride off, everything meets in the middle of the map and at some point there's just one guy left who rides off into the sunset drunk and happy.
Ok, I only speak a little English and even less Russian. Maybe I should use simpler sentences for the translation program so that the conditions are easier to understand. When I translate something here, my hair sometimes stands on end.
I was recently on a Russian site and the translation was very difficult to understand and I had to cancel my registration.

You must first conquer this village and destroy the enemy, then the S-400 system will switch to your side and you will receive reinforcements for your offensive.

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:19 pm Correct. You have to search for and capture the S-400 system with the special forces south of Bialystok. With this system, they are able to stand up to the enemy bombers. This is followed by counter-attacks by the Belarusians because they want to get the S-400 back or at least destroy it. As soon as the reinforcements arrive, they liberate Bialystok and advance against the enemy. That was my plan. You're supposed to follow orders, haven't we been over this before?

Well, playing for Belarusians I repelled Polish attacks and judging by the plot when I myself played for Poles the main thing is to take S-400 complex and our reinforcements will be loyal to us )))) But playing for the Belarusians is much easier )))))

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:26 pm What should I do with you? You play both sides. So now I plan differently. The opponents only appear with triggers as soon as you've marched close enough, otherwise you'll have 10,000 soldiers at the start with the side that's not actually playing the scenario and you'll flatten everything. I can build simple scenarios, set up an army, let it ride off, everything meets in the middle of the map and at some point there's just one guy left who rides off into the sunset drunk and happy.
Ok, I only speak a little English and even less Russian. Maybe I should use simpler sentences for the translation program so that the conditions are easier to understand. When I translate something here, my hair sometimes stands on end.
I was recently on a Russian site and the translation was very difficult to understand and I had to cancel my registration.

It's all good my friend ) Playing for two sides sometimes you can understand what the AI is missing or where I myself am stupid )))) Don't forget we have a test so we have to look at the options ))))) So it's ok now I'll play again for the Poles without deviating from the scenario and I'll report to you about my difficulties or successes )

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2024 7:34 pm You must first conquer this village and destroy the enemy, then the S-400 system will switch to your side and you will receive reinforcements for your offensive.Zablodow.png

I just read them and translate them when there are difficulties when everything goes according to plan, I just read the plot at the end out of curiosity about what the point was )))))
Which Russian site you want to get to and you have difficulties with registrations there maybe I can help you )))))

I will show you the page where you have linked the scenarios in the next few days. According to the translation, registration is free for the time being, but I have to pay something for ascending rankings...as I said, the translation is the problem.

Exactly, we are working on it, I want it to be playable for everyone who is interested. If it gets too complicated, everyone loses interest at some point. But it shouldn't be routine and stereotypical either. That's not so easy. By the way, I still need links to pictures of IS, Taliban etc. Thank you very much.

There are many ideas that cannot be realized at the moment. Invasion of Cuba, for example. Who should be chosen as the nation of Cuba? Or the weapons next...etc.
Israel in conflict with its neighbors...there would be a lot of material but in Modern Conflicts this era is missing.
But what is not yet can still be.

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2024 8:40 pm I will show you the page where you have linked the scenarios in the next few days. According to the translation, registration is free for the time being, but I have to pay something for ascending rankings...as I said, the translation is the problem.

Ok waiting for the link )
I've done it all right ) The scenario in principle is not complicated the main thing is to read the tasks carefully ( Soviet people just read the manual after they break something )))) And on the contrary, the higher and smarter the goal and task set, the more interesting it is to play ))))

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2024 8:48 pm Exactly, we are working on it, I want it to be playable for everyone who is interested. If it gets too complicated, everyone loses interest at some point. But it shouldn't be routine and stereotypical either. That's not so easy. By the way, I still need links to pictures of IS, Taliban etc. Thank you very much.

There are many ideas that cannot be realized at the moment. Invasion of Cuba, for example. Who should be chosen as the nation of Cuba? Or the weapons next...etc.
Israel in conflict with its neighbors...there would be a lot of material but in Modern Conflicts this era is missing.
But what is not yet can still be.

https://masterok.livejournal.com/7351192.html
https://hdpic.club/photo/2783-modernizi ... -foto.html
https://yandex.ru/images/search?lr=1033 ... 0%BD%D0%B0
https://yandex.ru/images/search?lr=1033 ... 0%B8%D0%BB
https://yandex.ru/images/search?lr=1033 ... 0%D0%BD%20

https://finance.rambler.ru/economics/47 ... a-talibam/
https://www.ferra.ru/review/techlife/ta ... eapons.htm

https://yandex.ru/images/search?img_url ... 0%D0%BD%20

Israeli F-16s are in the original Modern Conflicts mod )) In the company for Syria they sometimes organise raids )))) And who can portray Cubans so it is necessary to look at all nations that maestro Akkula added )))


https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/coldwar/cuba.php
https://imp-navigator.livejournal.com/319259.html
Cuba is not a rich country so it has Soviet armaments up to T-34-85 tanks and SU-100 )))) And various modifications to suit the needs and climate !



Vaughn how BTR-60s have been converted into wheeled tanks is unrecognisable ))))


Self-propelled artillery installation based on the T-34-85 tank )))))

ZSU-37 mm on BTR-60 bezels

The militaryphotos.net website presents photos of modernised Cuban T-62 tanks. The tanks have been upgraded to the T-62M level (additional armouring of the hull and turret due to the installation of passive protection modules, as well as a heat-insulating cover on the gun barrel). In the USSR, a similar modernisation of the T-62 was carried out in the mid-1980s, and among tankers they were called the T-62 "with Ilyich's eyebrows" (i.e. General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev's eyebrows)
https://ru.pinterest.com/ideas/cuban-army/906404790704/
https://vk.com/album-40469934_200821703
To me their remodelling reminds me of the remodelling of the Syrians and Egyptians ))))

https://tiberius66.livejournal.com/1380052.html
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/cuban ... y=relevant

And special forces they have really cool Black Wasps they even trained special forces of the USSR and GDR )
https://de.topwar.ru/236197-obedinennaj ... -mira.html
https://de.topwar.ru/161646-kubinskaja- ... -t-55.html
https://picturehistory.livejournal.com/6632893.html
https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9136583.html

Based on this assumption, we can estimate that FAR has about 2600 tanks currently available between:
650 pcs . Т-34/85;
50 pcs . IS-2;
100 pcs . PT-76;
1,300 pcs . Т-54/55;
500 pcs . Т-62.



There is also a fleet of armoured vehicles to supplement the vehicle fleet, which has over 2,000 active examples of the following models:

50 pcs. BRDM-1;
150 pcs. BRDM-2;
100 pcs. BTR-40;
150 pcs. BTR-152;
200 pcs. BTR-50;
outside 1000 pcs. BTR-60;
an undetermined number of BTR-70s;
undetermined number of BMD-1;
400 BMP-1;
unspecified number of David IMV Iguanas entirely locally produced.

https://ru.difesaonline.it/mondo-milita ... te-di-cuba



Cuban APC-60 with Romanian 30 mm anti-aircraft gun model 80/88
https://vk.com/ognestrelny_mir
https://alternathistory.ru/kubinskie-sau-na-baze-t-34/
https://military.wikireading.ru/h3H7rPWFdC

So we can say that Cuba's technique is true without their hybrids ))))
https://ser-sarajkin.narod2.ru/ALL_OUT/ ... uba001.htm
Well, the T-34-85 SU-100 and IS-2 can be taken from the original vanilla game ))))
https://mr-garett.livejournal.com/117570.html


P.S.
https://shushpanzer-ru.livejournal.com/

The arsenal. It's Interesting About Weapons. December 23, 2016 Canadian Leopard C2 tanks in Afghanistan.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Afghani ... =681&udm=2

https://yandex.ru/images/search?lr=1033 ... 0%B8%D0%BB
https://www.spec-naz.org/index.php?/topic/7195/

The question now is, should we leave the scenario with the no-fly zone over cities as it is or change it again? I don't intend to use this trigger everywhere, it was only specifically for this scenario.


Thanks for the links. I'll send you the next ones in a few days. I'm not sure yet how much I will create in total for the package.

I did a few conversions myself from the material Akkula has in his Modern Conflicts but it wouldn't work as only I have these units in my modification. But let's wait and see what surprises Akkula has in store for us with his new work.

I'll leave the scenario in the package after all. It's a small addition and doesn't get in the way.

I am working on the Cyprus scenario.

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:08 am The question now is, should we leave the scenario with the no-fly zone over cities as it is or change it again? I don't intend to use this trigger everywhere, it was only specifically for this scenario.


Thanks for the links. I'll send you the next ones in a few days. I'm not sure yet how much I will create in total for the package.

I didn't bomb cities as you wrote, it was a command order )))) And so well no-fly zones are sometimes introduced in reality and even restrictions on certain types of weapons and calibres but I think there is so much cynicism in it what difference does it make how people are killed if they participate in hostilities and conflicts

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:23 am I did a few conversions myself from the material Akkula has in his Modern Conflicts but it wouldn't work as only I have these units in my modification.
UB.png

But let's wait and see what surprises Akkula has in store for us with his new work.

Great units by the way ) Both Arab countries and Cuba have such armaments )))) Well, our honourable Akkula will make China and Taiwan, maybe something from North Korea if he decides to move the hostilities from Europe to Asia ))))

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:02 am I'll leave the scenario in the package after all. It's a small addition and doesn't get in the way. RV.pngOlymp1.pngERB.png

Let it be on this map newcomers can hone their strategic and tactical team thinking ))))

Tobi72 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 1:11 pm I am working on the Cyprus scenario.Cyp.png

Well, that's great.
https://puerrtto.livejournal.com/738136.html
https://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/905302.html
https://de.topwar.ru/177328-tragicheski ... tilla.html

Ready for testing.