Forum
https://forum.slitherine.com/
NNNNNNOOOOOO!!!Japoivvb wrote: ↑Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:41 am new idea/rule
- no surrenders on retreating if there are 3 friend units beside, free enemy ZOC, label game engine
similar surrender mechanic implemented in PzC2 I guess viewtopic.php?t=88191
Goose_2 if you are not already you need to play Panzer Corps 2. It was made for you.goose_2 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:14 pmNNNNNNOOOOOO!!!Japoivvb wrote: ↑Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:41 am new idea/rule
- no surrenders on retreating if there are 3 friend units beside, free enemy ZOC, label game engine
similar surrender mechanic implemented in PzC2 I guess viewtopic.php?t=88191
Do not take away the 3 S's I so very much love
Suppress
Surround
Surrender
I love this trick and there are tactics to avoid it being implemented on you....learn to combat rather than take away my joy...please
It would not mean remove surrender logic, it does not make sense an unit surrenders if it is surrounded by 5 friend units and only 1 enemy unit in its 6 adjacent hex, it would be possible in no favorable situations (enemy ZOC, out of fuel, impassable terrain)Buffalohump wrote: ↑Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:21 pmGoose_2 if you are not already you need to play Panzer Corps 2. It was made for you.goose_2 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 18, 2020 5:14 pmNNNNNNOOOOOO!!!Japoivvb wrote: ↑Tue Aug 18, 2020 6:41 am new idea/rule
- no surrenders on retreating if there are 3 friend units beside, free enemy ZOC, label game engine
similar surrender mechanic implemented in PzC2 I guess viewtopic.php?t=88191
Do not take away the 3 S's I so very much love
Suppress
Surround
Surrender
I love this trick and there are tactics to avoid it being implemented on you....learn to combat rather than take away my joy...please
Regards
Unfortunately this does not surprise me as this is deadware in their eyes...not in oursPeteMitchell wrote: ↑Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:27 am It's been almost six weeks since we started collecting ideas but still no official signal/feedback...
PzC2 AO-39 gets early release for FM purchasers tomorrow.PeteMitchell wrote: ↑Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:27 am It's been almost six weeks since we started collecting ideas but still no official signal/feedback...
This used to be machine gun fire, wasnt it?guille1434 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 5:10 pm Too bad we did not receive at present some answer from some of the members of the dev team... I still don´t lose hope...
Another idea I just had, which could be implemented by a new trait (could it be called "Defgun" or something like that?) is that strategic and some of the tac bomber units should not decrease their ammo count when firing their defensive guns when responding to an attack made by enemy fighter aircraft. This would be the same concept like the one present in the game now: tanks do not decrease their ammo when firing their AA machine guns in response to an enemy air unit attack.
I think this would be a good thing, specially for strategic bombers, which should have just one or at most two ammo units (in a mission, they just flew to a target and dropped all the bombs on it, and then went back to its base), and if on the way they are intercepted, making defensive fire will not deplete their bomb load.
Tanks and Infantry do not have their ammo depleted when they defend against Tac Bombers and fighters....Strat Bombers always drain everything they attack. Well at least if they drop any bombs.guille1434 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 5:10 pm Too bad we did not receive at present some answer from some of the members of the dev team... I still don´t lose hope...
Another idea I just had, which could be implemented by a new trait (could it be called "Defgun" or something like that?) is that strategic and some of the tac bomber units should not decrease their ammo count when firing their defensive guns when responding to an attack made by enemy fighter aircraft. This would be the same concept like the one present in the game now: tanks do not decrease their ammo when firing their AA machine guns in response to an enemy air unit attack.
I think this would be a good thing, specially for strategic bombers, which should have just one or at most two ammo units (in a mission, they just flew to a target and dropped all the bombs on it, and then went back to its base), and if on the way they are intercepted, making defensive fire will not deplete their bomb load.
Hello Goose: I already though about fighter-bombers which can make attack using their heavy guns and or bombload... Because of that, is that I think this effect should not be "hard coded" by unit class, but controlled by a trait. And of course, it should be made to work only when the bomber is firing in self defense only when attacked by enemy aircraft (just like tanks do at present when attacked by aircraft) and not when the unit is making itself an attack on an enemy surface o air unit.
1. added as label game engineKawaleria wrote: ↑Sun Aug 30, 2020 5:57 pm hello
I think there should be 2 changes to level up difficulty.... but as an OPTION.
1. SE units should be counted into prestige total regarding soft cap ! because late war years are too easy, you can field 7 super 15 str tiger II units and this is unrealistic. Now it seems Bagration scenarios are not a destruction army group center but slaughter for Red Army. Imagine playing still Panzer 3s in 1944 due to draining prestige sum already in 1943
2. there should be something like production level for a specific unit. For example tiger I - only 4 slots in a game means you can have only 4 such units, Tiger II - 2 slots etc
This would trigger us to field more diverse army and historicly correct
What do you think?