Slitherine

stockwellpete wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 10:44 am I am going to let this poll run until next Sunday (March 24th), but I think we have got a pretty good idea now of how players feel. Normally in these sorts of polls we get around 30 players participating and we probably have got that already. Players have 2 votes and it is likely that 6 players have voted for both options 1 and 4 and maybe a few have voted for both 2 and 3. We seem to be split right down the middle with 17 not wishing to see a change and 16 in favour of some sort of trial. I think the 17 is a "harder" number because, as I say, some players may have voted for both option 2 and option 3. I also think the vote for option 4 is quite significant as it suggests around one-sixth of players would stop playing in the FOG2DL if larger armies were brought in across the board.

I think the most we can probably do, provided the trial is completed OK, is have one section each season with 1600pt armies. And we can rotate the larger armies through the sections as we proceed in subsequent seasons. Players who do not want to use the larger format will still have plenty of other options to choose from, because eventually we will have 6 sections in the tournament when the first medieval DLC is released.

Cunningcairn wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 10:36 pm Pete do you think there is any significance in the number of players wanting to trial a larger army, not taking into account the specific army size, is currently 21 against 19 that want no change? If the question had been different and not specified 1600 or 2000 point armies you could say the majority would like a trial