Page 328 of 341
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 4:22 am
by rexhurley
Division A
rexhurley (persians) by the squeekiest of margins narrowly 39/40 bt Londo (early Byzants) 43/38 in a tight and intense match where we were both trying to get that last vital point.
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 10:13 am
by stockwellpete
These tables will help you identify which players you still have to play and they will tell you which matches we have received results for (at the time these tables are first posted). Just find your name in the left-hand column and read across the page to see your points won - empty boxes mean that we have not received a result for that match. These charts will also tally with the latest league tables posted in the results thread.
Yuknoom has won Classical Antiquity C division!
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 10:17 am
by stockwellpete
With an excellent record of seven wins and a draw in his nine matches he finishes two points ahead of maulet. Congratulations and well played.

PeterGuest has won Classical Antiquity D division!
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 10:21 am
by stockwellpete
PeterGuest has just edged out IMC by a tiebreaker decision. Both players recorded eight wins and a defeat but Peter won the match with IMC right back at the beginning of the season to take the top spot. Congratulations.

Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 10:26 am
by Praeter
QF Results
Praeter, Normans, 15/39 beat tullius, Ango-Normans, 41/39
tullius, Normans, 35/39 beat Praeter, Anglo-Normans, 41/39
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 10:27 am
by Praeter
Div C
Praeter, English (18/28) beat tullius, Serbians, 38/33
Re: Later Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 10:31 am
by stockwellpete
These tables will help you identify which players you still have to play and they will tell you which matches we have received results for (at the time these tables are first posted). Just find your name in the left-hand column and read across the page to see your points won - empty boxes mean that we have not received a result for that match. These charts will also tally with the latest league tables posted in the results thread.
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 10:40 am
by stockwellpete
These tables will help you identify which players you still have to play and they will tell you which matches we have received results for (at the time these tables are first posted). Just find your name in the left-hand column and read across the page to see your points won - empty boxes mean that we have not received a result for that match. These charts will also tally with the latest league tables posted in the results thread.
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 10:52 am
by stockwellpete
These tables will help you identify which players you still have to play and they will tell you which matches we have received results for (at the time these tables are first posted). Just find your name in the left-hand column and read across the page to see your points won - empty boxes mean that we have not received a result for that match. These charts will also tally with the latest league tables posted in the results thread.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 12:09 pm
by MikeMarchant
Division C
MikeMarchant's Byzantines (15/34) beat zumHeuriger's Avars (18/18)
A tough and close battle where the numbers really counted. The Avars fielded superior quality troops but were badly outnumbered and struggled to bring their superiority to bear. A closer battle than the result might suggest and I was greatly relieved at the end when I saw that I'd won (I'd won before I'd even realised).
Thanks for the game, zumHeuriger, I really enjoyed it.
And thanks to everyone for all the games. Win, lose or draw (although there weren't any draws) I enjoyed every battle in this division, and in all of the other divisions I played in this round. This was my last, until next time, hopefully soon.
Best Wishes
Mike
Re: Classical Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 12:50 pm
by mcfcivo
Div D
mcfcivo pyrrhic 28/37 defeated mchargmg roman 38/35
Great game, I got lucky with Roman routs disordering units behind,
cheers,
Andy.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 1:05 pm
by tofman04
Division C result
tofman04 (African Vandal, later 500-534 AD) 6/21 beat zumHeuriger (Avar, later) 25/21
Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 1:33 pm
by lydianed
QF Result
lydianed (Normans) 28/39 vs tofman04 (Anglo-Normans) 39/39
lydianed (Anglo-Normans) 39/39 vs tofman04 (Normans) 39/39
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 3:11 pm
by klayeckles
div A
Londo....pw londo
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 3:17 pm
by Londo
Div A
Londo (Later Serbian) 18/46 beat Cunningcairn (Crown of Aragon) 35/35
Re: Later Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 4:05 pm
by Jonathan4290
Div A
Jonathan4290 (Picts) 35/50 defeats Batesmotel (Romans) 37/35
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 4:30 pm
by epos
DIV C
Epos (Later Teutonic) – (21/27) > beat < zumHeuriger (Medieval French) – (33/33)
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 9:18 pm
by Peterabb
Division C
Peterabb (Lombard, later 776-1077AD) 24/28 defeated zumHeuriger (Avar, later) 21/20
Another very tough battle.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2014 11:41 pm
by lydianed
Div A
lydianed (Lombard) 34/40 vs tullius (Arab Conquest) 41/38
Thanks for the game. That's it for this division for me. Cheers to all.
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:16 am
by Epicouros
Div. B
Epicouros (Early North African Fatimids) 32/33 beat gazxtrix (Lombards) 46/46 by the narrowest of margins.
Could (should?) have been a draw: both armies destroyed each other's left flanks, and mutually in the centre. In the last few turns, it came down on dice rolls, really. A bloody affair.