Page 4 of 5
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:29 pm
by Edmund_Blackadder
Challenge up for enakan
password 280BC
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:24 pm
by Edmund_Blackadder
Two Pyrrhus against Rome results:
Edmund (Pyrrhus) 24/45 vs Enakan (Romans) 64/58
Edmund 11.0
Enakan 5.3
Edmund (Romans) 51/58 vs Iandavidsmith (Pyrrhus) 49/45
Edmund 10.9
Iandavidsmith 8.8
Thanks for two close (and rather violent) games
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:41 pm
by TDefender
TDefender (Romans) 64/58 vs Londo (Pyrrhus) 19/45
Londo: 11 pts / TDefender 4,2 pts.
Fogman (Romans) 44/58 vs TDefender 52/45 (Pyrrhus)
Fogman: 11,5 / TDefender 7,5 pts.
Ok the "worse player" prize is awarded

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:38 am
by iandavidsmith
TDefender wrote:TDefender (Romans) 64/58 vs Londo (Pyrrhus) 19/45
Londo: 11 pts / TDefender 4,2 pts.
Fogman (Romans) 44/58 vs TDefender 52/45 (Pyrrhus)
Fogman: 11,5 / TDefender 7,5 pts.
Ok the "worse player" prize is awarded

Hey that's my spot

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:44 am
by Enakan
Think I forgot to post a result!
Ian and I had a hard fight, his Romans vs my Pyrrhics.
Enakan 10.0
Ian 8.7
Good game!!!!!
Now where did I put my keys.................
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 6:51 pm
by fogman
Fifth Round: no maneuver bs for this one, just pure close combat mayhem.
Romans vs Samnites & Gauls
Make sure you play with version 2 (above)
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans)
Enakan (Samnites) vs TDefender (Romans)
Fogman (Samnites) vs Enakan (Romans)
Iandavidsmith (Samnites) vs Fogman (Romans)
Londo (Samnites) vs Iandavidsmith (Romans)
Edmund (Samnites) vs Londo (Romans)
The Samnite Player initiates the challenge.
Note: Enakan can’t initiate so TDefender you need to initiate in your matchup.
Historical Deployment
No Double Move, No Fog of War.
Use password.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Roman and Latin Hastatii are swordsmen +, not just swordsmen. Same with elite Samnites and Noble Gauls. For some reason, the description panel shows them as swordsmen, at least on Mac. They are swordsmen + for combat purposes.
Enjoy
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 7:02 pm
by fogman
Previously,
Tarentans vs Lucanians
Edmund (Tarentans) 10
Fogman (Lucanians) 9.3
Edmund (Lucanians) 9.0
Fogman (Tarentans) 4.4
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 10:43 pm
by TDefender
Games up:
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans) pw: veni
Enakan (Samnites) vs TDefender (Romans) pw: vidi
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:43 pm
by Enakan
Thank you T!!!!
Heading over to accept!
Fogman, ready when you are!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:21 pm
by Londo
Challenge up for Ian ...
pw mayhem
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2018 12:03 pm
by iandavidsmith
Att Fogman ,
Challenge posted
Password = foggy
Good luck
Ian
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:19 am
by fogman
Challenge for Enakan
Fogman (Samnites) vs Enakan (Romans)
pw: italia
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2018 11:06 am
by Enakan
Thank you Fogman!
Results for TDefender and I, good close game, especially at the end!
T's Romans 8.8 against my Samnites 10.0, started out early ahead but he was narrowing the lead towards the end of the game.
Thanks Tee!!!!!!!

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2018 7:22 pm
by Edmund_Blackadder
Challenge up for Londo. Password 280BC.
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:07 pm
by TDefender
Another defeat
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans) 56/61 - 28/48
TDefender: 5,2 pts
Edmund: 9,2 pts
Thanks everyone for the battles!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:52 pm
by Edmund_Blackadder
TDefender wrote:Another defeat
TDefender (Samnites) vs Edmund (Romans) 56/61 - 28/48
TDefender: 5,2 pts
Edmund: 9,2 pts
Thanks everyone for the battles!
Thanks for posting TDefender, you beat me to it. Thanks also for a good battle where you killed most of my generals! It was actually 61/56 though, so I think I get 10.9. Not that it makes much difference as Londo has just beaten me in the other game. I suspect he has won comfortably overall.
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:49 pm
by TDefender
Sorry you're right! it's 56/51 - 28/48 so yes you get 10.9 points!

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:39 pm
by Enakan
Fogman knocked me off a couple of days ago, his Samnites vs my Romans.
But I'll let HIM tell you the gory details!!!

Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 1:11 pm
by Londo
Londo (Romans) 32/48 - Edmund (Gauls and Samnites) 51/51
Londo 10
Edmund 6.7
The Romans were not keen on fighting Gauls in broken or forested terrain, so staged a mock retreat away from them, which had the desired effect. The Gauls came out to play, but were soon suffering from lack of armour (and good Roman dice).
The battle with the Samnites was a more even affair.
The Triarii were pillars of strength - they defeated everything in front of them, and not one of the four units was even disrupted by the end.
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:03 pm
by fogman
A couple of results,
Romans (fogman) 42/51 vs Samnites (Enakan) 50/48
fogman 10.4
Enakan 8.2
Epirotes (fogman) 36/45 vs Romans (Londo) 61/58
fogman 10.5
Londo 8.0
Only two battles in progress. We’re moving into Lords of History next for those interested.