Page 4 of 4
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:24 am
by bahdahbum
Can someone answer the basic question of the facing of that kinked column ... Otherwise it will reappear in another post !
And can ne of the conceptors answer the questions .
That would be great and end a lot of useless speculation
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:28 am
by dave_r
For anyone who was arguing with me about FoG players, or gamer's behavior in general I have two words for you:
Case
and
Point
I take it you're American then and missed the sub text?
Definitely American and from a previous post still living with his mum.
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 11:06 am
by david53
dave_r wrote:For anyone who was arguing with me about FoG players, or gamer's behavior in general I have two words for you:
Case
and
Point
I take it you're American then and missed the sub text?
Definitely American and from a previous post still living with his mum.
No Dave someone thats just not had the pleasure of playing you

Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 11:25 am
by titanu
I think a number of posters have touched on how the right solution could be reached. As far as I can see the rules only talk about 'facing two directions' as a result of turning in combat and hence that is a definition. Thus the kinked column is NOT facing in two direction etc.
Also is there any truth in the rumour that it was Dave Ruddock's performance at the IWF that started the rioting in Greece?
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 11:40 am
by dave_r
Also is there any truth in the rumour that it was Dave Ruddock's performance at the IWF that started the rioting in Greece?
I suppose you are saying that the Greek government put all their money on me to finish second and the reason for the financial collapse is because I didn't?
Not guilty I am afraid. I am reliably informed it was all Hammy's fault.
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 11:55 am
by shadowdragon
david53 wrote:dave_r wrote:For anyone who was arguing with me about FoG players, or gamer's behavior in general I have two words for you:
Case
and
Point
I take it you're American then and missed the sub text?
Definitely American and from a previous post still living with his mum.
No Dave someone thats just not had the pleasure of playing you


*wipes coffee off the keyboard*
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 3:38 pm
by peteratjet
dave_r wrote:And who is Karl Pilkington?
Karl Pilkington is a man with a perfectly round head

Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 6:32 pm
by stenic
dave_r wrote:
Definitely American and from a previous post still living with his mum.
So you take pride in some of the stinkiest cheesy moves since DBM and then start casting aspersions about people's domestic arrangements. Is that really necessary?
Granted the game in question may have been played between friends and so any iffy moves were in the spirit of friendly competativeness but it certainly doesn't look good at first reading. Understandable that some may think this the norm and not reserved for Hammy, Tim and sundry other mates.
Steve P
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:04 pm
by dave_r
So you take pride in some of the stinkiest cheesy moves since DBM and then start casting aspersions about people's domestic arrangements. Is that really necessary?
I thought so.
Granted the game in question may have been played between friends and so any iffy moves were in the spirit of friendly competativeness but it certainly doesn't look good at first reading. Understandable that some may think this the norm and not reserved for Hammy, Tim and sundry other mates.
Since you know nothing about me then I think you quite clearly have the right to make blanket assertions that only prove your own ignorance.
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 10:15 pm
by stenic
dave_r wrote:So you take pride in some of the stinkiest cheesy moves since DBM and then start casting aspersions about people's domestic arrangements. Is that really necessary?
I thought so.
Granted the game in question may have been played between friends and so any iffy moves were in the spirit of friendly competativeness but it certainly doesn't look good at first reading. Understandable that some may think this the norm and not reserved for Hammy, Tim and sundry other mates.
Since you know nothing about me then I think you quite clearly have the right to make blanket assertions that only prove your own ignorance.
I questioned insulting some one and then suggested that some people may get the wrong impression based upon the content of the original post. You've already admited the cheese so what blanket assertions are you refering to?
Steve P
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 2:43 am
by gozerius
All right everyone! I've got a hose and I know how to use it! Now start behaving before the shock collars go back on.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 2:45 am
by gozerius
All right everyone! I've got a hose and I know how to use it! Now start behaving before the shock collars go back on.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 11:42 am
by peterrjohnston
I realise a lot of this is humour, or attempts at it (like my poor humour). But this is degenerating into "handbags at dawn". Tone it down.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 3:08 pm
by BeansNFranks
Deleted
No more.
Moderator
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 3:34 pm
by jdm
OK Guys
I think we wind this one up please. It is begining to upset people and there have been complaints. So can we now drop this thread
Regards
JDM