Slitherine

I've made changes (hopefully improvements) to the first (league table) and second (game schedule) posts, as follows:

1. League table (first post) is now color coded with players who aren't aren't involved and players who are involved in an ongoing game.
2. Game schedule (second post) also color coded to show which games are ongoing and which are concluded, along with the date games were started and (if applicable) concluded (only goes for new games starting now). In addition, players' places are presented.

Both posts have time stamps when they were last updated (in GMT+1 time zone).

So this will hopefully give you a good indication of whether e.g. another player can be challenged. But please don't entirely rely on that, because it's all dependent upon me having updated table and schedule with reported challenges and results.

But please always look in the latest posts of the thread and see whether these have been posted before or after the time stamp of the table and schedule updates. And always keep in mind, as mentioned above, that time stamps of table and schedule are expressed in GMT+1 time zone, so you may need to translate to your own.

I will try to update table and schedule once per day, but hope for your understanding and patience if that's not always upheld.

Finally, I will from now on not confirm in post that table and schedule have been updated, but you will have to look for yourself in the first and second post and the respective time stamps.

Enjoy and keep challenging and playing!

Good job Andreas, that helps.

10. tyronec - Alan 25-650 AD
Challenges
7. Captainwaltersavage Roman 425-492 AD

Accepted challenge - but which army do you have Frankish or Alan?

Have you finished your current battle?

Hi All

12. ericdoman1 Alan 25-650 AD 1600 points

lost to

10 tyronec Frankish 496-599 AD points

ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:28 pm ...

and now

12. ericdoman1 Frankish 496-599 AD 1600 points

challenges

9. deeter Hunnic (Western) 455-559 AD

You can't do that yet, Eric, since as challenger in your latest game, you must wait 24 hours after having reported the result before you are allowed to challenge again.

From the rules:
A player must wait 24 hours, after having posted the result of a game (in which he was the challenger), before being allowed to make a new challenge.

ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:28 pm 12. ericdoman1 Alan 25-650 AD 1600 points
lost to
10 tyronec Frankish 496-599 AD points

tyronec wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 10:14 pm 10. tyronec - Alan 25-650 AD
Challenges
7. Captainwaltersavage Roman 425-492 AD

First and second posts updated.

Hi All

Merry Christmas and happy holidays.

12. ericdoman1 Frankish 496-599 AD 1600 points

challenges

9. deeter Hunnic (Western) 455-559 AD 1600 points

ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 25, 2020 6:28 am Hi All

Merry Christmas and happy holidays.

Thanks: you too, Eric!

ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 25, 2020 6:28 am
12. ericdoman1 Frankish 496-599 AD 1600 points

challenges

9. deeter Hunnic (Western) 455-559 AD 1600 points

Yep: those were the 24 hours... I'll (as usual) be waiting for opponent (deeter) to accept challenge and will then add to the game schedule etc.

12. ericdoman1 Frankish 496-599 AD with Visigoth Allies1600 points

challenges

9. deeter Hunnic (Western) 455-559 AD 1600 points

Challenge accepted

pw = deeter

The Huns are ready for you Eric.

Deeter

Aetius39 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 19, 2020 9:27 am

kronenblatt wrote: ↑Fri Dec 18, 2020 11:35 pm 5 kronenblatt Arab (City) 300-633 AD
challenges
4 Aetius39 Indian 320-545 AD

Accepted!

kronenblatt Arab (City) 300-633 AD lost against Indian 320-545 AD Aetius39.

First and second posts updated.

TomoeGozen (Romano-British 407-599 AD) would like to challenge Aetius39 (Arab (City) 300-633 AD). Interested?

TomoeGozen wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:36 pm TomoeGozen (Romano-British 407-599 AD) would like to challenge Aetius39 (Arab (City) 300-633 AD). Interested?

Sure thing.^^

Aetius39 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:54 pm

TomoeGozen wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:36 pm TomoeGozen (Romano-British 407-599 AD) would like to challenge Aetius39 (Arab (City) 300-633 AD). Interested?

Sure thing.^^

All set up , I decided to add Anglo Saxon allies , hope you don't mind too much Password is 'Britain'

TomoeGozen wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 8:40 pm

Aetius39 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:54 pm

TomoeGozen wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:36 pm TomoeGozen (Romano-British 407-599 AD) would like to challenge Aetius39 (Arab (City) 300-633 AD). Interested?

Sure thing.^^

All set up , I decided to add Anglo Saxon allies , hope you don't mind too much Password is 'Britain'

OK, added. Thanks.

TomoeGozen wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 8:40 pm

Aetius39 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:54 pm

TomoeGozen wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 7:36 pm TomoeGozen (Romano-British 407-599 AD) would like to challenge Aetius39 (Arab (City) 300-633 AD). Interested?

Sure thing.^^

All set up , I decided to add Anglo Saxon allies , hope you don't mind too much Password is 'Britain'

np, just more various cultures to "engage"^^

schmolywar wrote:

5. kronenblatt Indian 320-545 AD
challenges
2. schmolywar Kingdom of Soissons 461-486 AD

3. Karvon - Arab (City) 300-633 AD defeated 1. rbodleyscott - Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD 61-55.

We switch ranks and armies, I taking the Sassanids and he my current Bretons.

Karvon

Karvon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 28, 2020 11:37 pm 3. Karvon - Arab (City) 300-633 AD defeated 1. rbodleyscott - Sassanid Persian 477-590 AD 61-55.

We switch ranks and armies, I taking the Sassanids and he my current Bretons.

Karvon

Thanks for report. That's entirely correct, Karvon: and first and second posts are now updated. So you're in the lead now!