Page 287 of 341
Re: macsen has withdrawn from FOGDL
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 6:15 am
by stockwellpete
paulmcneil wrote:I'll take on any that are free
Thanks for the offer, Paul, but you have already entered all of the sections.

Re: macsen has withdrawn from FOGDL
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 6:16 am
by stockwellpete
I will be taking macsen's place in the themed event, Classical Antiquity and High Middle Ages.
Re: macsen has withdrawn from FOGDL
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 6:22 am
by stockwellpete
So that just leaves a space in Early Middle Ages A division. Any takers?
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 7:52 am
by LHaricot
Hi and sorry, previously posted this in the "Arrange your matches" thread...
DIV D
LHaricot's Teutonics (26/30) beat MikeMarchant's Cypriots (37/35)
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:28 am
by MikeMarchant
Division C
MikeMarchant's Nikephorian Byzantines (21/36) beat Greyhunter's Early Bulgars (40/37)
Bad luck Grey. Good battle, thanks for the game.
Best Wishes
Mike
Re: Later Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:34 am
by ianiow
Div A
Roll up, roll up! Knock a Visigoth off his perch and win a prize! Anyone welcome to have a go.
pw=ianiow
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:49 am
by PeterGuest
Div C
PeterGuest's Khazars defeated Peterabb's Lombards (18/35 vs 28/28)
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 9:51 am
by PeterGuest
Div C
Challenge up for tofman04 - p/w: tofman04
PM sent
Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:00 am
by stockwellpete
Message to players in Division A
I have replaced macsen and will be using the Later Scots Isles and Highlanders (1291-1355).
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 10:26 am
by claymore58
What can I say, but "the luck of the Irish". Sorry Rex you played well.
Claymore Irish 45/46
Rexhurley Tut Knights 37/37
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 12:43 pm
by Demetrios
Div A
Demetrios ( Western Turkish - Khazar) 15/30
defeats
Tullius ( Arab Conquest) 39/38
Re: Early Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:43 pm
by CharlesWayneRobinson1
Division B
CharlesWayneRobinson (Dailami Dynasties, Musafarids) 941-984AD) wins 17/25 vs 32/31 otbc (Western Turkish 651-737, Khazar)
Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:47 pm
by CharlesWayneRobinson1
Division B
CharlesWayneRobinson (Middle Hungarian 1308-1399) wins 28/36 vs 44/44 gazxtrix (Anglo-Irish, early)
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:08 pm
by CharlesWayneRobinson1
Challenge Divison B
CharlesWayneRobinson dailami
from paulmcneil later visigothic
pw =CharlesWayneRobinson
I cannot get the password to work.
Re: Later Antiquity: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:37 pm
by PeterGuest
Div C
PeterGuest's Visigoths defeat tullius' Quadi (28/40 vs 41/41). Brutal battle of the barbarian hordes - the Goths managed to hold the hills while their Gepid allies were sacrificed to keep the Quadi Sarmatians out of the way.
Re: Later Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:40 pm
by PeterGuest
Division C
Challenge for epos - p/w: epos
PM sent
Re: Themed event: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 2:40 pm
by Jonathan4290
Londo wrote:Pool A, Group C
Bouvines
Londo (French) 36/52 beat Cunningcairn (Angevins) 59/58
Poitiers
Londo (French) 16/48 beat Cunningcairn (English) 25/25
In Poitiers, I assembled the French knights together, and they attacked through the forest on the French left, and then swung round into the flank of the English position on the hill. The spearmen didn't do much. This was the only way I could see for the French to have a chance. Did anyone have a different strategy for the French which worked?
I actually won by a general attack largely across whole front but focused on very narrow sectors. Main axis was against English center including knights, which was able to gain a foothold on level ground early on and then became war of attrition French could win there. There were also pinning attacks on English left/right while, like you and Lydianed, attacks around the flanks won the day.
Re: macsen has withdrawn from FOGDL
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:51 pm
by cromlechi
Hi Pete I'll take the same army as Macsen was going to use. Principate Romans 228 I think it was. Understand they have to have 8 allies. Not played ROmans much so will be a new experience.

Re: High Middle Ages: winner post your result here . . .
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 4:37 pm
by IMC
Div D
IMC (Scots Highlanders) 17/46 beat gamercb (Castillian) 37/36.
A battle between knights and impact foot.....across the whole table top with the nibble foot winning out in the end. Great game and score doesn't reflect how close it was at one stage.
thank you.
Ian
Re: macsen has withdrawn from FOGDL
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 5:53 pm
by ricoual74
stockwellpete wrote:macsen has been forced to withdraw as he has no internet access at the moment. Therefore, there are now vacancies in the following sections . . .
Classical Antiquity Division B
Later Antiquity Division A
Early Middle Ages Division A
High Middle Ages Division A
Themed event Pool A, Group B.
I will take up some of these gaps myself (particularly HMA and the themed event) unless there is someone else who is interested in them. Please let me know promptly if you are interested. Thanks.
I can take his place on later antiquity.