Page 25 of 341
Re: Any questions?
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:13 pm
by Mike48
Hello dear fellows in FOG,
Maximus was asking me why I have choosen the Western Turkish Khazar army. Why? For a lot of reasons: I have a 15 mm Turkish medieval army (for FOG), I like the "old Khazar's culture" and few "Historians" suppose they are the ancestors of the Ashkenases. I like also their wild country.
About the digital FOG game I think the Khazar army is weak but I play for the pleasure.
Re: Who hasn't started a game yet?
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:30 pm
by rexhurley
stockwellpete wrote:Come on! Fess up on here and explain yourself!

(especially those in the Eternal Empire section!)
I havent started in classical yet as was travelling with work and cant say I'm impressed with the army selection i was given since no one else in my div had my first choice, so havent bothered yet. in the rest of EE and Med I'm getting creamed in eight games
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:31 pm
by rexhurley
MatteoPasi wrote:Division B
rexhurley and Kmaher have been challenged from my Alans, passoword is "agloveintheface"

I'll probably pick it up tomorrow mate
Re: Early Middle Ages: post your results here . . .
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:58 pm
by ericdoman1
Result Division A
eric (ENAD-Fatimids) 24/39 beat Demetrios (Later Visigothic) 41/39
A very good game and a good chat
Re: Early Middle Ages: post your results here . . .
Posted: Fri Oct 04, 2013 11:36 pm
by Turk1964
All results recorded to this point
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:02 am
by Leonidas048
Hello Chris6 i tried to accept your challenge but none of your games would accept the password you put out; can you put out another password thanks.
Re: Who hasn't started a game yet?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:06 am
by claymore58
me ... just sending invites now

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:08 am
by claymore58
stockwellpete wrote:
Gallic warriors circa 200BC.
Nice strategically placed shield

Re: Classical Antiquity: post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:09 am
by McHarg
Div D.
mchargmg (Palmyran) 25/33 beat Leonidas048 42/42
Good tough game!
Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:12 am
by claymore58
Div A game for ericdoman1
password is paldogfood

Re: High Middle Ages: post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:27 am
by ulysisgrunt
Two division C results:
Ulysisgrunt War of Roses Tudor 35/41 tullius Later Polish(later) 36/28
Ulysisgrunt War of Roses Tudor 25/41 Okie Middle Hungarians (Crusader) 22/22
Re: Early Middle Ages: post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:33 am
by ericdoman1
Result Division A
eric (ENAD-Fatimids) 33/47 vs PA/cavehobbit (Umayyads) 37/37
Another excellent game.
A song for def spears, "Should I stand or should I charge" (The Clash:))
Re: Who hasn't started a game yet?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:44 am
by stockwellpete
rexhurley wrote: I havent started in classical yet as was travelling with work and cant say I'm impressed with the army selection i was given since no one else in my div had my first choice, so havent bothered yet.
Late Republican Romans were on our army "discretionary list", so we had to look at the relative strengths of the players and their army selections to ensure that Division B in CA constituted a "good competition". As you are knocking very loudly on the door of the established Division A players now, it was decided to give you your second choice army, the Gepids. The fact that nobody else had chosen the Romans, or any other particular army, is less a consideration in the FOG Digital League than it might have been in "old" LOEG, for example.
Re: Classical Antiquity: post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:14 am
by george123
Division C
George 123 (Macedonian Successor) 31/38 beat lydianed - Gallic (Early Lowland) 42/41
Good game yet again!
Re: Early Middle Ages: post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:19 am
by Eplowinger01
Division D
Eplowinger (Thematic Byzantines: 30/31) beats Conaire (Byzantines: 33/31), and you don't get much closer than that!

Re: High Middle Ages: post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:24 am
by ianiow
Div A
ianiow (Moldavian) 19/41 beat CharlesRobinson (Wallachian) 41/31
Re: High Middle Ages: post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:29 am
by ianiow
Div A
ianiow (Moldavian) 32/41 beat rexhurley (French) 33/32
Re: Who hasn't started a game yet?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:17 pm
by macsen
Guilty as charged... But to make it up just started 9 games
I have noticed that people have dropped the practice of PM ing as well as posting, it would save ne quite some time if I didn't have to trawl each forum for challenges.
Cheers
macsen
Re: Who hasn't started a game yet?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:46 pm
by voskarp
I think PM'ing challenges should be mandatory, maybe for next FoG DL.
Re: Early Middle Ages: post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:57 pm
by Turk1964
Division A result
Turk1964(Abbasid Arab early)28/33 def Cavehobbit(Umayyad's)35/34
A very close game where I just managed to edge out the Hobbit. Thanks for a good tough game mate. Cheers Turk