Page 209 of 602
Re: TDC III - Later Medieval: Posting Results and STANDINGS JAN 22ND
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 5:11 am
by ericdoman1
eric defeated Rosedelio - 60 - 47
Tough encounter
eric defeated Cyberhetman - 45 -12
My plan worked very well based on Phillip's terrible dice.
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Challenges
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:31 am
by oscarius
Div B
oscarius Byzantine 551-578 AD
Challenges issued for:
frederic02 Romans 379-424 AD
rpadilla1988 Roman 285-312 W Armenian allies
tmac11 Sassanid Persian 350-476 with Arab bedouin allies
Warg1 Roman 105 - 25BC with Armenian
pw: greek
PM sent
Re: Field of Glory II - The Divisional Championships (TDC)-Rules
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:02 am
by Swuul
I am not sure if I am the only one with this issue, but I haven't been able to connect to the MP server since yesterday morning. I tried yesterday in the afternoon and in the evening, and the attempt timed out. Attempting to connect again (on my lunch-break at work), and seems to not be able to connect. Hopefully things work once I get home today in the evening.
Re: TDC III - Classical - Challenges
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:14 am
by anderarcos11
Badger73 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:03 am
Badger73 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 9:26 pm
Classical Division
D
Badger73 (Seleucid 166-125 BC with Jewish allies) challenges
keksoid (Syracusan 412-281 BC with Numidian allies)
Matches created. PM's sent. PW in PM.
Posted in
Dark Ages
carpenkm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 9:39 pm
Div C players please note. Keksoid has withdrawn and i will ask phlewis if he would like to step in. I will keep you posted.
Has
keksoid also withdrawn from Classical Division C?
My challenge of 20-Jan-23 still shows unread in my outbox for the past two days.
Mee too. I think that this position should be occupied by a substitute
Re: TDC III - Classical - Challenges
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:18 am
by anderarcos11
Badger73 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:03 am
Badger73 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 9:26 pm
Classical Division
D
Badger73 (Seleucid 166-125 BC with Jewish allies) challenges
keksoid (Syracusan 412-281 BC with Numidian allies)
Matches created. PM's sent. PW in PM.
Posted in
Dark Ages
carpenkm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 9:39 pm
Div C players please note. Keksoid has withdrawn and i will ask phlewis if he would like to step in. I will keep you posted.
Has
keksoid also withdrawn from Classical Division C?
My challenge of 20-Jan-23 still shows unread in my outbox for the past two days.
That also reminds me that you have to accept a challenge sent for this same period.
Re: Field of Glory II - The Divisional Championships (TDC)-Rules
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:38 pm
by rbodleyscott
Swuul wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:02 am
I am not sure if I am the only one with this issue, but I haven't been able to connect to the MP server since yesterday morning. I tried yesterday in the afternoon and in the evening, and the attempt timed out. Attempting to connect again (on my lunch-break at work), and seems to not be able to connect. Hopefully things work once I get home today in the evening.
It was down until the early hours of this morning, but I was able to connect to the Ancients MP server both earlier today and just now.
Re: TDC III - Classical - Posting Results
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:44 pm
by anderarcos11
anderarcos11 Macedonians 320-261 BC beat gfs26 Germanic foot tribes 105-259 + Gallic allied, 53 to 26. Score is 86 to 26
Re: TDC III - Dark Ages - Posting Results
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 1:52 pm
by Yinsd00
Div C
Yinsd00 Arab (Umayyad) 685-750 AD defeats mberisso Rus 960-1053 AD w Pecheneg 40-5
Thanks for the game.
Re: TDC III - Dark Ages - Posting Results
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 3:10 pm
by anderarcos11
carpenkm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 9:37 pm
With on ly one result a piece in Divs A & B I will refrain from posting an update. However Div C has made up for the slow start and is well progressed with Anderarcoss11 setting the target fro others to challenge. Yinsdd002 looks well place though with an unbeaten run of 6 games. The mid table players also have a long way to go yet so it is far from all over.
I think Yinds00's scores are wrong. In his wins with Ulysisgrunt and Trueknight he should have more points.
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Challenges
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:30 pm
by Indibil
Div D
Indibil Challenges:
gort7078 Byzantine 551-578 AD allies: Germanic Horse Tribes
TheBug67 Roman 425-492 AD with Germanic Foot Tribe Allies
mcfcivo Roman 24 BC – 196AD w Armenians
keksoid Lombard 568-569 AD
wzfcns Roman 379-424
Pasword: camarasa
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Challenges
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:30 pm
by Indibil
Div D
Indibil Challenges:
gort7078 Byzantine 551-578 AD allies: Germanic Horse Tribes
TheBug67 Roman 425-492 AD with Germanic Foot Tribe Allies
mcfcivo Roman 24 BC – 196AD w Armenians
keksoid Lombard 568-569 AD
wzfcns Roman 379-424
Pasword: camarasa
Re: TDC III - Classical - Challenges
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:38 pm
by Badger73
anderarcos11 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:18 am
That also reminds me that you have to accept a challenge sent for this same period.
Do you mean me? I don't see a PM for any challenge from you. Am I mistaken.
Re: TDC III - Classical - Posting Results
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 5:02 pm
by tyronec
Div A
tyronec (Carthaginian) defeats klayeckles (Indo-Greek) 58-21
Close battle for much of the game and the Greek pikes were too much for the Carthaginians but elsewhere the Indos were a bit squishy and the African nellies proved superior (luckier !) than their Asian cousins.
Re: TDC III - Later Medieval: Posting Results and STANDINGS JAN 22ND
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 5:04 pm
by tyronec
Div A
tyronec (German) defeats Rosedelio (Wallacian) 45-8.
Thanks for the game.
Re: TDC III - Imperial - Posting Results
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 5:14 pm
by anderarcos11
anderarcos11 Lombards 570-649 AD with avarian allies beat phlewis Roman 197 - 284 AD with Armenian, 57 to 26. Score is 91 to 26
Re: TDC III - Classical - Challenges
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 5:18 pm
by anderarcos11
Badger73 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:38 pm
anderarcos11 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 11:18 am
That also reminds me that you have to accept a challenge sent for this same period.
Do you mean me? I don't see a PM for any challenge from you. Am I mistaken.
I would probably forget to message you
Re: TDC III - Early Medieval - Posting Results
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 6:33 pm
by ericdoman1
Division A
eric defeated TaBai - 68-58
Yet another close encounter
Re: TDC III - Early Medieval - Posting Results
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 7:36 pm
by Kroche
Kroche Sword Brethren 1204-1237AD w Baltic Tribe
defeats
ericdoman1 Berber (Murabit) 1087 - 1147 with Andalusian allies
63-52
Sword Brethren won a hard fought victory vs Berbers. A strong force of knights pushed forward on the right while supported by spearmen edging forward in the centre. Baltic foot on the left supported by some light horse and archers advanced to engage the light Berber forces on that side. The charges of the knights were very effective and severely weakened the Berber forces on the right. Sword Brethren spear in the centre held out long enough against the veteran muslims to enable the knights to defeat the Berber right. Ultimately the Berbers won in the centre, but were a bit too far to get back into the deciding melees for the final points. GG
Re: TDC III - Classical - Posting Results
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:15 pm
by anderarcos11
anderarcos11 Macedonians 320-261 BC beat mh5064 Macedonian 260-148 BC, 53 to 23. Score is 90 to 23
Re: TDC III - Dark Ages - Posting Results
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:18 pm
by carpenkm
anderarcos11 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 3:10 pm
carpenkm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 9:37 pm
With on ly one result a piece in Divs A & B I will refrain from posting an update. However Div C has made up for the slow start and is well progressed with Anderarcoss11 setting the target fro others to challenge. Yinsdd002 looks well place though with an unbeaten run of 6 games. The mid table players also have a long way to go yet so it is far from all over.
I think Yinds00's scores are wrong. In his wins with Ulysisgrunt and Trueknight he should have more points.
You're absolutely correct - i put the scores in the wrong way around (and i developed the spreadsheet!!!). Please check scores and let me know any errors.
Thanks