Slitherine

passing the next barbarossa again? then Kursk, day D and so on. Apparently there isn’t enough to do something new

One issue right off the bat is size of the troops they are way to big Sorry, but that stands out so much....other than that glaring issue it looks good, yea im sure others will defend it but that's my opinion.

MjrOu812 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 12:11 am One issue right off the bat is size of the troops they are way to big Sorry, but that stands out so much....other than that glaring issue it looks good, yea im sure others will defend it but that's my opinion.

Yes!...we all have our 'Preferences'!. Nothing wrong with your request.

However...your suggestion brings to mind an idea that just came to mind...to possibly have in the 'PzC2-'Game'...perhaps to have a built in 'Sizing-Adjuster'...so that the 'Player'...can set the 'Unit-Sizing-View'...to suite their preference.

In my case for example, my 'Eye-Sight' is not what it used to be, so...for myself...I prefer 'Larger-Unit-Sizes' on the 'Game-Screen'.

MjrOu812 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 12:11 am One issue right off the bat is size of the troops they are way to big Sorry, but that stands out so much....other than that glaring issue it looks good, yea im sure others will defend it but that's my opinion.

Yes!...we all have our 'Preferences'!. Nothing wrong with your request.

However...your suggestion brings to me an idea that just came to mind... to possibly have in the 'PzC2-'Game'...perhaps to have a built in 'Sizing-Adjuster'...so that the 'Player'...can set the 'Unit-Sizing-View'...to suite their preference.

In my case for example, my 'Eye-Sight' is not what it used to be, so...for myself...I prefer 'Larger-Unit-Sizes' on the 'Game-Screen'.

Retributarr wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 8:40 am

MjrOu812 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 12:11 am One issue right off the bat is size of the troops they are way to big Sorry, but that stands out so much....other than that glaring issue it looks good, yea im sure others will defend it but that's my opinion.

Yes!...we all have our 'Preferences'!. Nothing wrong with your request.

However...your suggestion brings to me an idea that just came to mind... to possibly have in the 'PzC2-'Game'...perhaps to have a built in 'Sizing-Adjuster'...so that the 'Player'...can set the 'Unit-Sizing-View'...to suite their preference.

In my case for example, my 'Eye-Sight' is not what it used to be, so...for myself...I prefer 'Larger-Unit-Sizes' on the 'Game-Screen'.

Look when the troops look two times bigger than tanks and everything else im going to call it for what I see.....it looks unrealistic

MjrOu812 post:
One issue right off the bat is size of the troops they are way to big Sorry, but that stands out so much....other than that glaring issue it looks good, yea im sure others will defend it but that's my opinion.

MjrOu812 posted:
Look when the troops look two times bigger than tanks and everything else im going to call it for what I see.....it looks unrealistic

Retributarrs Reply:
Yes!...what you say from how you see it...from your perspective, i will not make dispute .

However...the "informational purpose" in the 'PzC2-Game' using these disproportionate sized icons... is 'Not' to depict actual deployed 'Units' as single/individual elements/entities...where 'Actual-Proportional Size' is relevant as in that particular instance...but, to instead...'Symbolically' illustrate 'Unit-Formations/Groups'...in that...one Armored/Infantry Unit depicted on the Game-Screen represents perhaps a hundred Tanks or ten-thousand infantry-men.

Hence! ... 'Proportional-Sizing' is not 'required/important' here, instead...it is useful in making it easier to see who is what...and what is who!. If true to life sizing was implemented,...then it sometimes makes is very difficult to differentiate between similar looking/type units... to see if your dealing with... for example...a 'Garrison Unit or a Divisional Unit' on the 'Game-Screen'. In essence..it is very similar as to how 'Nato-Icons'/Symbology...is used...to represent the various air-sea & land participants.