Page 3 of 5
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:32 pm
by TDefender
Same here with Londo:
Londo (Syracuse) 26/51 vs TDefender 60/51 (Carthage)
Londo 11.8
TDefender 5.0
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:35 pm
by fogman
Carthage (fogman) 22/51 vs Syracuse (TDefender) 59/51
fogman 11.6
TDefender 4.3
Epiros (fogman) 38/50 vs Carthage (Ian) 57/56
fogman 10.2
ian 7.6
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 10:39 pm
by Londo
Londo (Carthage) 33/56 - Ian (Epiros) 52/50
Pyrrhus held back his phalanx for quite a while, leading to a Mexican standoff in which both sides' heavy infantry stared at each other outside charge range, and made rude gestures without engaging.
On the other side of the Epirot army, they assaulted the city, and moved forward aggressively to fight the Numidians and Spaniards. This did not end well, and there were few steady Epirot units remaining on this side of the battle by the end.
Eventually the two phalanxes did come to grips. This was an even fight, but with his rear crumbling, Pyrrhus sounded the retreat.
Londo 10.4
Ian 5.9
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:32 pm
by Londo
Londo (Epiros) 37/50 - Blackadder (Carthage) 57/56
This time round, Pyrrhus lifted the siege of the city, and Epirot units in the rear moved inwards to a narrower defensive line, aiming to avoid contact with the Spanish shock troops for as long as possible.
The two phalanxes engaged swiftly, and the Epirot pikes did well on impact, inflicting much disruption.
On the left of the Carthaginian phalanx, Spaniards and Punic cavalry attempted to flank the Epirot phalanx, but were destroyed by lancers.
The Carthaginian infantry armour helped somewhat, but couldn't prevent their phalanx ultimately collapsing.
Londo 10.2
Blackadder 7.4
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:28 pm
by Enakan
Edmund Blackadder (Carthage) had us going back and forth constantly in the game!
Luckily for me the dice got hot in the last two turns, I sneaked out a win against him.
Carthage 51/51, Syracuse 48/51.
Enakan 10/10
Edmund 9.4/10
Thanks Richard!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 11:45 pm
by fogman
Third Round
Make sure you play with version 2 (above)
Lucanians vs Tarentans
TDefender vs Iandavidsmith
Enakan vs Londo
Fogman vs Edmund
One person initiates the challenge as PAIRED GAME as this middle round is symmetrical mirror. You play the same player for both sides.
Historical Deployment
No Double Move, No Fog of War.
Use password.
Enjoy
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2017 11:50 pm
by fogman
Challenge for Edmund
pw: calabria
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:15 am
by iandavidsmith
Att TDefender
Round 3 - Challenge posted
Password = round3
Good Luck
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:32 pm
by Londo
Londo (Carthage) 30/51 - fogman (Syracuse) 53/51
Londo 10.4
fogman 5.9
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:53 pm
by Londo
Round 3 - Lucanians vs Tarentans
Challenge posted for Enakan. PM sent.
Password: enakan
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2017 1:55 am
by Londo
Londo (Tarentans) 36/42 - Enakan (Lucanians) 48/48
Londo 10
Enakan 8.6
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 1:43 am
by fogman
Happy new year, everybody.
ps: i’m playing like crap so somebody stops Londo!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:28 pm
by iandavidsmith
Result
Lucanians (IDS) 32/48 67% vs Tarentans (TD) 44/42 104%
IDS 10.4 pts , TD 6.7 pts
Tarentans (IDS) 40/42 95% vs Lucanians (TD) 52/48 108%
IDS 10.8 pts , TD 9.5 pts
It been a long while since i reported a Lords game , hopefully i got the points right.
Thanks for the games ,
Ian
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:29 pm
by iandavidsmith
fogman wrote:Happy new year, everybody.
ps: i’m playing like crap so somebody stops Londo!
Somebody needs to stop Mollari !!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:26 pm
by Londo
fogman wrote:Happy new year, everybody.
ps: i’m playing like crap so somebody stops Londo!
Not gonna happen!
Londo (Lucanians) 39/48 - Enakan (Tarentans) 43/42
Londo 10.2
Enakan 8.1
Hope everyone had a great holiday season. Let's get the next round going!
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2018 3:05 am
by fogman
Fourth Round: the Romans are coming!
Romans vs Pyrrhus
Make sure you play with version 2 (above)
TDefender (Romans) vs Londo (Pyrrhus)
Enakan (Romans) vs Edmund (Pyrrhus)
Fogman (Romans) vs TDefender (Pyrrhus)
Iandavidsmith (Romans) vs Enakan (Pyrrhus)
Londo (Romans) vs Fogman (Pyrrhus)
Edmund (Romans) vs Iandavidsmith (Pyrrhus)
The Roman Player initiates the challenge.
Note: Enakan can’t initiate so Edmund you need to initiate in your matchup.
Historical Deployment
No Double Move, No Fog of War.
Use password.
Enjoy
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 11:41 am
by iandavidsmith
Att Enakan & Edmund
Iandavidsmith (Romans) vs Enakan (Pyrrhus) password = lords
Edmund (Romans) vs Iandavidsmith (Pyrrhus) password = sdrol
Good Luck
Ian
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 4:33 pm
by TDefender
Game up for Londo:
Romans vs Pyrrhus pw: vidi
Gl and Hf! (expecially for me

)
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:04 am
by fogman
challenge up for TDefender
Pyrrhus (TDefender) vs Romans (fogman)
pw: legions
Re: LORDS OF ITALY c 280 BC
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:47 am
by Londo
Challenge up for fogman.
pw spqr