Re: The future of FOG-AM competitions...
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2017 10:16 pm
Another set of Ancients Rules!!? How many does that make?28mm Swordpoint.
Another set of Ancients Rules!!? How many does that make?28mm Swordpoint.
At Britcon we have 6 being played (FOG, MeG, ADLG, DBA, DBMM, Saga), and at Derby there are also events for 7th, 6th, Impetus, Swordpoint & Armati. For Swordpoint there are maybe 40 players attending events in the UK in the last 12 monthspetedalby wrote:Another set of Ancients Rules!!? How many does that make?28mm Swordpoint.
A far more pleasant way to say it Paulnavigator wrote:I am unique
paul
Huddersfield? I thought you were further North? And to be fair - you've got to be in with a chance of winning that game.for the first time in 45 years my football team has reached the dizzy heights of the Premier League.
Again more pleasant than anything I would have saidnavigator wrote:
the words.. 'unsung hero' comes to mind...
navigator wrote:I Teed that one up for you....
32! I'm in, Tim.We're on 31 for FoG as of today (even without Chris!)
For not playing FoG can I use the excuse that I'm too depressed as my team was relegated from the football league?The only reason i have not signed up for Britcon is that for the first time in 45 years my football team has reached the dizzy heights of the Premier League.
While what you say is on track in many ways, I would caution. there is clearly a significant chunk of people who DON'T always go on line. As a list checker over there years, I can tell you even when you post mandatory must use the army builder or excel sheet, I still saw over at least 10% that did it there own way. And of those who used on line stuff it was clear many more used older versions. There is a large slice that don't connect on-line or interact except for everyone few months. Then when you get across international languages more arise. It is the nature of on-line communities to think everyone is on-line, but as you require that, you lose some people.RSDPIT wrote: OK MEG (snip) the main advantage is it's online, its available, (snip) , the speed and delivery is what is driving it, in contrast FOG has been in forum and argument for ever, and the launch?? "well possibly the rules will be available for purchase at Britcom" .....really??!!!....
particularly in the younger age groups (look around you!!! ), today not only the younger generation but virtually everybody researches and access's their information online, why not Rules and lists?
Hello, glad to see you have come back to ancients gaming - that's the most important thing. In terms of speed of delivery, all wargames rules have that issue. MEG had a development cycle, and has had a bit of post release change as well. But I think you are mistaken if you think it is online. The army lists and points values are (a good thing) but the rules themselves are not. And that's because Simon, the owner, has spent out money developing the system and needs to get it back.RSDPIT wrote:Some interesting comments: I thought i would add some thoughts from a recent entrant /newby point of view
OK MEG has these infuriating cards and weird dice, but hey the rules have to be paid for somehow, the main advantage is it's online, its available, last night their biblical lists came out, nobody could stop talking about how bad Libyans where or how good Egyptians were, the speed and delivery is what is driving it, in contrast FOG has been in forum and argument for ever, and the launch?? "well possibly the rules will be available for purchase at Britcom" .....really??!!!....
The point is if you think FOG is a viable, interesting and competent set of AM rules that does the job and you want to encourage more participation generally, particularly in the younger age groups (look around you!!! ), today not only the younger generation but virtually everybody researches and access's their information online, why not Rules and lists? I don't know the economics of publishing a rule set in hard back, but the amount likely to be sold is going to make nobody rich! To use some very apt analogies " are we still preparing to fight the last war, or are we looking to win the next one?"
The feeling I get from the forum, is that there is a competition to "poach" player from other rules sets by altering the rules to make them more "attractive", the reality is there is space I am sure for alternative rule sets, (as somebody mentioned version 7 is still up and running somewhere!!) but we need to increase the player base, new blood will come and challenge the existing premier league players and make it much more sustainable "if they can access it"