Page 3 of 10
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:14 am
by duncanr
I am trying to make it hard to reduce his chances elsewhere - luckily just a GAR
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:18 am
by duncanr
things are getting desperate - we try for some nibbles and also find the Italian SUBs are blocking Gibralter, we catch a break and manage to sink one
elsewhere Greece has fallen and Egypt is under pressure

Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:30 am
by duncanr
still so many things to worry about!
still a chance for a 41 Sealion, what are Axis intentions re Persia, when will Barbarossa occur !
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 6:00 am
by duncanr
we guess wrong in our transport route so some I could lose DD and Transport
pressure in Egypt
moderate success with some nibbling
still isn't looking pretty - we will do some defense work in England next turn - lets hope its not an early summer and a 42 Sealion
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:00 pm
by Peter Stauffenberg
The Axis are very potent in GS v4.0 so you need to make good strategies as the Allies and only fight where you can hope to get the better results. Retreating might be necessary when being overwhelmed. E. g. Egypt is such a situation. Losing Egypt is acceptable if you can keep Iraq. If you fight in Egypt and lose and then can't hold Iraq then it will be a disaster. Things will chance once USA join the Allies. First priority should be to get control over the Atlantic so the Allies can plan offensive missions in Northern Africa or bolster defenses in Egypt and Iraq.
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 12:14 am
by duncanr
yes and we have just had a very bad turn!
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 12:30 am
by duncanr
ok a 41 Sealion is looking a strong possibility
elsewhere its no fun either

Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 12:38 am
by duncanr
argh complete disaster as we try a cunning forward defence ploy only for the IT CORP not to retreat - two air attacks and and an ARM grrr, couldn't even get it to retreat with the GAR - its going to be very unpleasant next turn - we have just accelerated the fall rather than slowed it down!
at least being suspicious and cautious helps in the homeland, unfortunately we do some things in the worng order

- fighting on three fronts looking very possible - for a year

Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 8:34 am
by duncanr
ouch here comes the third front
not great as first we lose a FTR and then we get a terrible FTR roll and could lose the second
egypt is about to fall
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 8:48 am
by duncanr
it doesn't get any better
we mess up the order of our moves in England so we miss the opportunity to destroy the landed MECH, it won't be pretty
in Morocco we catch a break
and manage to kill the damaged ARM - it won't change the outcome though
England is not looking pretty as we do lose the second FTR
missed a couple of screen shots and completely forgot the rebellion was arriving - doh
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 9:11 am
by duncanr
we make a small counter in Morroco but its not enough to risk trying to finish of ARM
in England we just try desperately to slow them down - its a long way to US entry
we have some big decisions next turn
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2016 8:20 pm
by duncanr
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2016 8:30 pm
by duncanr
so Morroco falls as expected - England loses more territory and we have a small victory as we sink a couple of Italian BB's off Persia
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2016 10:52 pm
by Cybvep
Italian BBs near Persia?
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2016 11:22 pm
by duncanr
triple combo - aggressive play by Max, coupled with a lot of fine weather in 39 and some mistakes from me - its not pleasant!
here is the after PIC if I can ever get it to work

Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:12 pm
by duncanr
ok its 1 August 1941 - London has fallen, Franco is with the Axis and Axis forces invade Persia - not great!
In England its just delay delay delay

Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:29 pm
by dagtwo
I'm sorry to say "been there, done that". It didn't end well for me, either. Hopefully you'll keep your nerve and make this a different ending.
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 12:58 am
by Peter Stauffenberg
You also have to remember who he's playing against. Supermax is an elite player
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 5:58 am
by duncanr
So Portugal rounds out the fall of Europe
we get fine weather in England instead of the Mud we want
slight win in that our 3 step STR managed to kill the last step of an Italian CORP as we slow the loss of persia - screen shots again soon - and finally we have a strategy, now to plan for its execution!
Re: Duncan vs Supermax 4.0 charlie (no Supermax please)
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:36 am
by Cybvep
Hmm, surely you must be talking about the loss of Iraq? If the Axis attacks Persia, then the SU joins the war immediately.
BTW did you lose Basra? IIRC you permanently "lose" 15 Soviet war-only PPs when you lose Basra, because the Lend Lease convoys cannot get through.