Page 3 of 3

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:16 pm
by Redpossum
JimmyThePict wrote:Well, it's Early Picts for me, probably going to be one of the least popular armies at BritCon this year, but I have had them re-based and they look great, thanks to HHH for a job well done. Who needs armour.
Go go, Jimmy! Picti Power FTW!

Give 'em fits with those Lt Chariots, and we expect a full write-up, whether you're glorybound or goat :)

Remember what that one guy said, about the Lt Chariots standing up to a charge from his Knights, and holding them in melee until they got flanked and routed?

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:10 pm
by SirGarnet
JimmyThePict wrote:Well, it's Early Picts for me, probably going to be one of the least popular armies at BritCon this year, but I have had them re-based and they look great, thanks to HHH for a job well done. Who needs armour.
With a tag like JimmyThePict you sort of narrow your options. :wink:

Now, if it was JimmyTheCaledonian I'd be concerned, but with Picts having a selection from LCh, LH, MF Offensive Spears (unprotected, admittedly), LF, Caledonian Medium Impact Foot (or HF ally early Anglos), and upgade to superior in list or ally, you have a varied palette to draw from.

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:13 am
by JimmyThePict
If you can't confuse the enemy by fielding a Pictish army, then your propaganda department is not up to scratch. Hope to post some britcon battle reports late August.

By the way, you are never unprotected when you have a large variety of heathen gods on your side :twisted:

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:08 pm
by whitehorses
You never know when you might need a prayer LOL

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:04 pm
by paulcummins
dammit still undecided
sword and buckler men or Almughavers

Then I just have to write a list

then all I have to do is buy and paint the figures

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:53 pm
by davidandlynda
Mines in,got it wrong though,got to keep the record going
David