Page 3 of 3
Re: Evade Distance?
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:32 pm
by petedalby
How do you know it'll be solved in v2 anyway?
Don't you read the thread?
There are no partial interpenetrations in FoGR - and if I was a betting man I reckon they'll adopt the same wording. Same as blocked turns.
Re: Evade Distance?
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:41 pm
by dave_r
petedalby wrote:How do you know it'll be solved in v2 anyway?
Don't you read the thread?
There are no partial interpenetrations in FoGR - and if I was a betting man I reckon they'll adopt the same wording. Same as blocked turns.
Assumption, Assumptions...
Re: Evade Distance?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:52 am
by petedalby
Assumption, Assumptions...
True - but based upon this from the V2 anouncment:
Interpenetration anomalies prevented:
Leapfrogging prevented.
“Teleport” interpenetrations prevented.
Just another month to go and we'll know for sure.
Re: Evade Distance?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:29 pm
by Polkovnik
A month ? 4 days surely ?
Btw, I was assuming Dave R was correct about partial interpenetrations earlier (not happening in the a manouvre phase), so didn't bother checking. Not that I could check, as I sold my rules some time ago in anticipation of V2 coming rather sooner than it has.
Re: Evade Distance?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:28 pm
by petedalby
I was assuming Dave R was correct
Never a good move

Re: Evade Distance?
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 10:30 pm
by bbotus
I was assuming Dave R was correct about partial interpenetrations earlier (not happening in the a manouvre phase)
Interpenetration rules are in the General Movement Section and pertain to any phase of the battle. Nothing forbids a BG from making a legal voluntary interpenetration another BG in the Manoeuver Phase.
So after all this work on trying to get V1 right, now its out the window.

Hope V2 is a lot better
