Page 3 of 8

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:03 am
by macsen
Turk1964 wrote:My army selections should be Dailami (Buyids) and Samanids. You have me down for Hamnidads i changed those a while ago. Cheers Turk
Fixed

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:21 am
by macsen
Turk1964 wrote:Just a thought Mac but maybe next season we could have a mystery round where you can have any army in Decline and Fall ?
Keep the buggers guessing eh!

I like it!

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:44 am
by Turk1964
Glad you like my idea Mac and yes it will keep them guessing. No problems with me as im down the bottom of the ladder and like the idea of a sneak attack :lol: :lol:

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:36 pm
by Aristides
macsen wrote:Keyth retired, I should have removed his score to make that clear, my bad.
Ah - i thought perhaps he had merely retired from moderating...

In that case, Batesmotel is next on our list. PW: 3rdtymluki

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:24 pm
by macsen
This season is going well with all challenges made except for batesmotel, who everyone seems to have attacked :shock:

cheers

macsen

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:13 pm
by batesmotel
batesmotel34 -Nikephorian Byzantines(early) - 25/38
phlewis Dailami(Buyid) - 30/30

Byzantine numbers and bow fire decided this. The Dailami lost a TC and an FC, no camps were looted. Thanks for the game.

Chris

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:45 am
by iandavidsmith
Lord Chaldia is proud to announce a victory against the Great Turk
and his Saminid Horde.
A very narrow one at that with the Turk coming back from all odds
to nearly achieving a victory, only for a few sneaky Ghaznavid horse archers pillaging the
Saminids camp clenched the victory.

iandavidsmith Ghaznavids 29/33
vrs
Turk1964 Saminids 45/39

Turk lost a camp.
No FC's lost

Another Great game , thanks Turk
Cheers
Ian

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:38 am
by Turk1964
Yes a thrilling game which started very ordinary for me and i thought i was going to get a severe thrashing.Fortunatly my Dailami and armoured defensive foot held their ground and took it back to the Ghazis. My Cav were a huge disapointment and fought without courage and were soon running from the battle field. No doubt those Nellies scared the hell out of them :lol: Thanks for a great game Ian. Cheers Turk

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:53 pm
by Aristides
Aristides wrote:
macsen wrote: In that case, Batesmotel is next on our list. PW: 3rdtymluki
Bump...

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:13 pm
by batesmotel
Aristides wrote:
Aristides wrote:
macsen wrote: In that case, Batesmotel is next on our list. PW: 3rdtymluki
Bump...
Aristides,

I picked up the challenge and did my set up on Monday so it's been your turn since then.

Chris

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:22 pm
by Aristides
My Byzantines (24/39) defeated Bates' Dailamis (35/34).

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:22 pm
by macsen
Spring 1027 so far.
Waiting on
Tiavals v Aristides
IDS v Turk1964
Turk1964 v batesmotel
and Batesmotel's two challenges.
With 17 games completed.

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:49 am
by iandavidsmith
macsen wrote:Spring 1027 so far.
Waiting on
Tiavals v Aristides
IDS v Turk1964
Turk1964 v batesmotel
and Batesmotel's two challenges.
With 17 games completed.
Hi Macsen , my game with Turk is complete ,
See the post towards the top of this page ,
Cheers
Ian

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:02 am
by Tiavals
Aristides Nikeforian byzantine(later) 43/39 vs Tiavals Komnean byzantine(mercenaries) 9/38

Nothing looted. No commanders killed, I think.

My unit composition happened to be a more or less perfect counter for Aristides, so the result was decided pretty early.

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:24 pm
by batesmotel
Posted challenge for Tiavals, password "tiaval"s.

Chris

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:44 pm
by Aristides
Tiavals wrote: My unit composition happened to be a more or less perfect counter for Aristides, so the result was decided pretty early.
Plus I have never seen ayone roll such consistently excellent dice as T! (I make no dark accusations, as this also happens during my own turns!)

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:19 pm
by Turk1964
Mr Lucky i callls him :lol: :lol: Yes its not meant to happen and luck isnt a factor they say. I respectfully disagree and think luck is an overwhelming factor in some games.

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:10 pm
by Aristides
Turk1964 wrote:luck is an overwhelming factor in some games.
I have to agree - although it does seem the same players win competitions regularly...

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:58 am
by batesmotel
batesmotel - Nikephorian Byzantine(early) 16/42
Tiavals - Italian Ostrogothic 48/44

Byzantines lost their camp, the Ostrogoths lost both their FCs who died heroicially trying to save their troops. The Ostrogoths deployed in two wings and the Byzantines were able to gang up on one while delaying the other Ostrogothic wing with light troops assisted by generous amounts of impassable terrain on that flank.

Thanks for a fun game.

Chris

Re: To Tame A land 2.0

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:25 pm
by Turk1964
Im sure ive already played Chris and Lost but i may be mistaken. It was Dailami vs Ghazanivads cant remember the score though.....