Slitherine

angusosborne (Umbrian) defeats ZeCid (Etruscan) 51-21

Our battlefield is a mountain pass with a good defensive position for the Umbrians with hills and some patches of rough going to defend. The Etruscans brought lots of light foot (no medium foot in that army) and had the better of the start of the battle, but the Umbrians had numbers on their side (19,000 vs 14,000) and the Italian foot which makes up a lot of the army stood up adequately. The superior numbers really paid off and by the end the Etruscans only had two steady units of heavy infantry left.

tyronec wrote: ↑Fri Oct 28, 2022 7:20 pm

How have you rated new players this season? I had thought you would use TDC?

I looked at past competitions and estimated a value.

That is still a bit vague. When you consider you are 1st in TDC and by my quick calculations, first in the Slitherine tournaments. How did you estimate value, exactly please.

You gave me a 7.65 rating on my first entry into HOML. I won more games than I lost in the first season and scored more points than all other players in my division and yet I dropped to 6.80.

The only wat that could happen is your formula takes into account the ratings of each player. If that is the case as you are on a 6, there is a VG chance you'll be in on a 7.00 at the end of HOML 3. What is your formula? It would be interesting to compare with TDC's. I think there may well be a way to convert HOML scores into TDC. Although TDC's does take into account ratings between players

That is still a bit vague. When you consider you are 1st in TDC and by my quick calculations, first in the Slitherine tournaments. How did you estimate value, exactly please.

You gave me a 7.65 rating on my first entry into HOML. I won more games than I lost in the first season and scored more points than all other players in my division and yet I dropped to 6.80.

The only wat that could happen is your formula takes into account the ratings of each player. If that is the case as you are on a 6, there is a VG chance you'll be in on a 7.00 at the end of HOML 3. What is your formula? It would be interesting to compare with TDC's. I think there may well be a way to convert HOML scores into TDC. Although TDC's does take into account ratings between players

You have all the information, there is no more.
I get you don't agree with the some aspects of rating points, I don't claim it is perfect and I will be fine tuning it for next season. However it is only a mechanism for organising players into divisions and doesn't effect their score.

Division B

Dreddradish (Spartan) defeats tmac11 (Carthaginian) 55 - 24

tyronec wrote: ↑Sun Oct 30, 2022 8:51 am

That is still a bit vague. When you consider you are 1st in TDC and by my quick calculations, first in the Slitherine tournaments. How did you estimate value, exactly please.

You gave me a 7.65 rating on my first entry into HOML. I won more games than I lost in the first season and scored more points than all other players in my division and yet I dropped to 6.80.

The only wat that could happen is your formula takes into account the ratings of each player. If that is the case as you are on a 6, there is a VG chance you'll be in on a 7.00 at the end of HOML 3. What is your formula? It would be interesting to compare with TDC's. I think there may well be a way to convert HOML scores into TDC. Although TDC's does take into account ratings between players

You have all the information, there is no more.
I get you don't agree with the some aspects of rating points, I don't claim it is perfect and I will be fine tuning it for next season. However it is only a mechanism for organising players into divisions and doesn't effect their score.

What information? How have you given yourself a 6.00? I accept the scoring systems, never said I didn't. I just think it is wrong that you have given yourself a 6.00. It means that you will score better than you really should do. That to me is wrong and dare I say slightly unfair TC, which is very surprising.

Division G result
Bagatrix1805(Pontic) drew with Bodhran (Roman) result was 51-46 so Bagatrix scores 46 and Bohran scores 51.

DIV F
wzfcns Viking (ireland) 900-1049 beat mh5064 Norman 923-1040 AD，55-61
score:65-55
A very hard fought battle

DIV F
wzfcns German 888-932 AD beat SawyerK Norman 923-1040 AD 26-52
score:94-26

wzfcns Norman 923-1040 AD beat SawyerK German 888-932 AD 32-61
score:88-32

Division G

Game 2 Bodhran (Romans) draws Bagatrix 1805 (Pontics) 46-51

Thx to Bagatrix for this battle

Div A
eric (Macedonians) defeats Rpadilla (Persians) 48-18. Score 102-18

DIV C


ZeCid (Khorasan) defeats SpeedyCM (Rajput) 42-13

ZeCid (Umbrian) defeats angusosborne (Etruscan) 61-48

Middle of the battle, it was looking as quite lost (i have been so much offensive as i had a good defensive position), i feel more that dice help me in moral test etc

Division F

SawyerK leading the Roman 199-106 BC army
defeated
mh5064 with the Gallic 300-101 BC army
by 11 to 47.

Score: SawyerK 109, mh5064 11

Div B

Tmac11 defeated Morat in both mirror games

Results

Carthagians 60 - Spartans 54
Spartans 62 - Carthaginians 40

Both tough games as can be seen by the scores GG thanks

I think dragmio missed to report his win... the battle was over a week ago...

Div H

dragmio Arab(Umayyad) defeats gfs26 Arab(Abassyd) 62-56 --> final score 64-56

Thanks again to dragmio for the great battle !

Div B

Dreddradish (Carthaginian) defeats tmac (Spartan) 53 - 23

Division F

SawyerK leading the Gallic 300-101 BC army
defeated
mh5064 with the Roman 199-106 BC army
by 27 to 54.

Score: SawyerK 93, mh5064 27

Division G

mberisso (Norman) defeats Anicydeer533 (Anglo-Danish) 42-16; score 104-16

Division H

IMC Lombard 60% has defeated Garokan Byzantine 48%.

Thanks for the game.

IMC

Congratulations to Bagatrix, first player to complete all eight games.

Div B

Tnac11 Antigonid defeated Deeter Macedonian 45 - 20 in the battle of the pikes

GG thanks