Re: Ever-Green League - 300 BC
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 2:18 am
edit
Greek (Mercenary) 460-281 BC is also already taken and thus not available, as you can see in the first post of this thread, in the table of the players' standings.angel42052 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 2:13 amSInce the Gallics have been taken I will go with Greek (Mercenary) 460-281 BC.kronenblatt wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 7:59 pmWelcome, angel! Unfortunately Gallic 300-101 BC is already taken (all taken armies are in first post of this thread). However, there are still plenty to choose from in the second post, but just make sure the one you pick from there is not already taken.angel42052 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 7:56 pm IF they are available I'd like to chose Gallic 300-101 BC.
Thxs - Steve
MY apologies. I looked over the web pp. a couple of times and the Kyrenean Greek 321-276 BC is free. I'd like to be that and thxs for setting this up.kronenblatt wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 6:19 amGreek (Mercenary) 460-281 BC is also already taken and thus not available, as you can see in the first post of this thread, in the table of the players' standings.angel42052 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 2:13 amSInce the Gallics have been taken I will go with Greek (Mercenary) 460-281 BC.kronenblatt wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 7:59 pm
Welcome, angel! Unfortunately Gallic 300-101 BC is already taken (all taken armies are in first post of this thread). However, there are still plenty to choose from in the second post, but just make sure the one you pick from there is not already taken.
Thxs - Steve
You need to make sure that the army you pick from the second post is not already taken by another player. OK?
And.... Kyrenean Greek 321-276 BC is free! And yours to start with.angel42052 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 6:20 pmMY apologies. I looked over the web pp. a couple of times and the Kyrenean Greek 321-276 BC is free. I'd like to be that and thxs for setting this up.kronenblatt wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 6:19 amGreek (Mercenary) 460-281 BC is also already taken and thus not available, as you can see in the first post of this thread, in the table of the players' standings.angel42052 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 2:13 am
SInce the Gallics have been taken I will go with Greek (Mercenary) 460-281 BC.
Thxs - Steve
You need to make sure that the army you pick from the second post is not already taken by another player. OK?![]()
![]()
![]()
What are the constraints for scheduling the follow up match?kronenblatt wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 9:42 pmFirst post updated: tyronec and Badger73 have switched armies and places. Thanks for report.
What do you mean with "follow up match"?
No, you switch with each of your opponents immediately after your game has been concluded. So now you've switched armies with tyronec (you receiving his Indian 500 BC - 319 AD and he your Roman 340-281 BC), and your current army thus is Indian 500 BC - 319 AD. Which is the army that you will play your next game(s) with, as challenged or challenger.
Thanks for report. As a result, SawyerK exchanges current places and armies with MarcoCato75; thus, SawyerK's new place is now 12 and new army is Ptolemaic 320-218 BC, while MarcoCato75 is in place 13 and with the Spanish (Celtiberian) 300-10 BC army, their respective new armies to be used in the next one or two games (depending on challenges made and games concluded, as per rules). Opening post updated.SawyerK wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:38 pm SawyerK with the Spanish Celtiberian army defeated MarcoCato75 with the Ptlolemaics by 46-13. This score does not begin to show how close MarcoCato was to victory as the game finished with four fragmented Spanish units hanging by a hair and their entire center dissolving rapidly. The Spaniards were fortunate to have established an early lead in the conflict between the light units as well as benefiting from a rough battle field that hampered their opponents pike units.
I misunderstood that particular rule for the tournament. This format isn't really suited for me at the present time. Please remove me from all three period lists. I regret the inconvenience this creates. My best wishes to all the other participants.kronenblatt wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 9:37 pmWhat do you mean with "follow up match"?
No, you switch with each of your opponents immediately after your game has been concluded. So now you've switched armies with tyronec (you receiving his Indian 500 BC - 319 AD and he your Roman 340-281 BC), and your current army thus is Indian 500 BC - 319 AD. Which is the army that you will play your next game(s) with, as challenged or challenger.
Basically, armies float around, depending on which player plays against which player, when the different games get concluded, etc. (So your selected Roman 340-281 BC army was just which army for you to start with and to have in the 300 BC league, since it may or may not come back to you temporarily, either as your own army again or as an opponent's army.)
Rhoxolani 350 BC - 24 AD all yours: welcome to this year too, Eric! No such table currently exists, but it's a good idea and would be happy to see yours.ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 8:00 pm Hi Andreas
I'd like to join please and use the Rhoxolani
Is there some table you could put together showing us who has played whom. I started on one for 900 AD and I'll attach it to a reply as soon as I have finished it, if that's OK
Cheers
Eric
Absolutely, welcome Stew! Since Badger73 dropped out, taking the Indian 500 BC - 319 AD army with him from the league, it's available again and all yours as your starting army!
Thanks, guys! Both games have been added to fourth post's game schedule.ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:19 pm SawyerK has accepted a challenge and so issued challenge pw = rush
14 ericdoman1 Rhoxolani 350 BC - 24 AD with Skythian Allies 1600 points
vs
11 SawyerK Ptolemaic 320-218 BC 1600 points