Slitherine

EMA game with Sharkall
Sent: 08 Apr 2014 07:16
From: ericdoman1
To: stockwellpete Sharkall

Hi Pete

At the moment Sharkall and I are on or close to hills, near enough on opposite sides of the map so quite a distance between armies.

At the mo I have a 90/288 bp score in my favour (all 8 games played, thanks Londo:)) and Sharkall has a 113/238 score (approx?)/6 games.

This game will probably decide who wins EMA division A, what is the system used by yourselves to choose a winner?

If it is something that may favour one player then it would be good to know as it may mean one of us will need to attack. Based on the limited time, the time difference and the fact that we are averaging about a turn a day the game could be quite a long one and may well run out of time. I completed the majority of my games very early on as I knew that April would be very busy for me. I have course work, will be attending a training/coaching programme from 14 to 17 April (plenty of work to do before, during and after) and my 50th birthday is on the 10th.

Marius - Thought it would be right to include you in this.

What to do?

Cheers


Eric

Div A result:
Sharkall (Latin Greece) 18/49 vs Tiavals(Low countries Max) 42/32

I know you guys both like big armies, but gee, 288 BPs? No wonder you've won so many games!

Div A
Sharkall (Visigoths) 11/43 vs Demetrios (Arab Conquest L) 46/36

Haha, no those values are aggregates over all the matches, like total BP lost and total BP killed in the division

It would be good to know how the game will be scored, since Eric doesn't have any incentive to attack and I don't afford attacking into Dailami and Sup MF archers on steep hills either. And I agree with the need to have a solution fast, so we can finish the game in time. Taking other matches into account, or starting on a new map, or just giving the win to the player with the highest % of opponent army destroyed in this match, or any other rule that the organizers think makes sense

Hope they want more diversity in the league winners haha

Div A:
Tiavals(Attalid pergamene) 28/42 vs Londo(Late republican roman) 38/37
A tough battle in an interesting map.

Division C

George123 (Ipsos Alliance Successor) 27/40 beat lydianed (Gupta Indian) 47/43

obsolete

obsolete

obsolete

obsolete

ADJUDICATION PENDING

Tiavals v klayeckles - both matches.

Division A

Londo (Ghaznavid) 23/35 defeated cavehobbit (Early South Slav L) 46/45

Division A

Londo (Ghaznavid) 22/34 defeated CharlesWayneRobinson (Sassanid Persian L) 26/26

Division A

cavehobbit v rexhurley

rexhurley has conceded the match by PM to me.

ADJUDICATION RESULT

Tiavals v klayeckles = match awarded to Tiavals

May the best man win and well done to both of you in reaching final.