Slitherine

Re: Killer Battles Results

Postby tullius » 24 Feb 2012 10:47
Challenges posted for Flatsix518 and Gazxtrix for Early Archie Persians, pw tullius

I wonder if I should change my SAS and Immortal Fire armies, since it seems no one is gonna pick them up. I sure would like to prove that I'm the best with other armies too.

Tiavals wrote:I wonder if I should change my SAS and Immortal Fire armies, since it seems no one is gonna pick them up. I sure would like to prove that I'm the best with other armies too.

I see a lot of players with the Achaemenids.
I never played the Bulgarians but if you are feeling lonely I could try to cut your head

Uuh just realized you meant the Saka...

I meant both the Bulgarians and the Saka. Seeing as how I'm the only one in them, and I would assume that not too many people will join at this point....

Storm of Arrows section: Medieval Welsh

BillMc 36/44 beat Tiavals 45/45

For BillMc
winning = 2pts
45 break points achieved = 15pts
I killed 3,953 out of 13,500 - 29.3% = 5pts
No camp looted = 0pts

Total = 22pts

For Tiavals
36 break points achieved = 12pts
He killed 4,033 out of 13,200 - 30.6% = 5pts
No camp looted = 0pts

Total = 17pts

Another of the typical Welsh bloody games that could have gone either way.

Challenge posted for Grudgebringer, RoR - Later Ptolemaic (Greek) password ferb
Challenge posted for Tiavals, SoA - Free Company password ferb

Swords and Scimitars section: Later Crusader

stockwellpete 4/33 beat tullius 37/35

For me
winning = 2pts
37 break points achieved = 12pts
I killed 2,949 out of 10,500 - 28.0% = 5pts
No camp looted = 0pts

Total = 19pts

For tullius
4 break points achieved = 1pt
He killed 1,291 out of 9,900 - 13.0% = 2pts
No camp looted = 0pts

Total = 3pts

SOA - Free Company

Tiavals(19/28) vs Ferb(39/34)

For Tiavals:
Winning 2 pts
39 break points = 13 pts
3539/10200 slain = 34.6% = 6pts
No looting

Total: 21 pts

For Ferb:
19 break points = 6 pts
2545/8400 slain = 30% = 6pts
No looting
12 pts

Fedem wrote: I see a lot of players with the Achaemenids.

Is it painful?

stockwellpete wrote:

Fedem wrote: I see a lot of players with the Achaemenids.

Is it painful?

Excruciating

SOA - HYW

Aristides:

Winning 2 pts
34 break points = 11 pts
3547/8100 slain = 40%: 8 pts
No looting

Total: 21 pts

For iandavidsmith:
17 break points = 5 pts
2558/10500 slain = 20%: 4 pts
No looting

Total: 9 pts

I'm not sure who you played Aristides but it wasn't me

Ferb wrote:I'm not sure who you played Aristides but it wasn't me

My sincere apologies, old chap!

IF - Spartans

Aristides:

Winning 2 pts
42 break points = 14 pts
4618/10800 slain = 40%: 8 pts
No looting

Total: 24 pts

For porsenna:
26 break points = 8 pts
2609/11700 slain = 20%: 4 pts
No looting

Total: 12 pts

SoA - HYW

Aristides:

Winning 2 pts
34 break points = 11 pts
3289/10200 slain = 30%: 6 pts
No looting

Total: 19 pts

For tullius:

10 break points = 3 pts
2205/10500 slain = 20%: 4 pts
No looting

Total: 7 pts

i Just noticed this means i won all my games in the HYW department - but this doesn't mean I am to lead the army in the next round? Or is the '3 best games' rule only used as a sort of tie-breaker? (Totally neutrally and objectively, and without prejudice or favour of any kind, i do think if a player beats all the others in an army's sector he should lead it
Or actually do we have to wait till there rae 6 players in each group?

Second question: When/what do we do with very slow games? I have had a challenge up in Sparta for grudgebrnger and a Yorkist one up now for 5 days...

ROR - Seleucid
Tiavals vs jonno

Tiavals:

Winning 2 pts
35 break points = 11 pts
4407/9000 slain = 48% = 9 pts
No looting

Total: 22 pts

For jonno:

13 break points = 4 pts
2073/10240 slain = 20%: 4 pts
No looting

Total: 8 pts

Tiavals wrote:I wonder if I should change my SAS and Immortal Fire armies, since it seems no one is gonna pick them up. I sure would like to prove that I'm the best with other armies too.

Please let me know which ones you want to lead.

Aristides wrote:i Just noticed this means i won all my games in the HYW department - but this doesn't mean I am to lead the army in the next round? Or is the '3 best games' rule only used as a sort of tie-breaker? (Totally neutrally and objectively, and without prejudice or favour of any kind, i do think if a player beats all the others in an army's sector he should lead it
Or actually do we have to wait till there rae 6 players in each group?

Second question: When/what do we do with very slow games? I have had a challenge up in Sparta for grudgebrnger and a Yorkist one up now for 5 days...

Ideally each army would attract 4 to 6 players. A players best 3 scores would then give his total. Where we only have 3 players obviously it's the total of his 2 games.

The problem with just taking the number of wins is that the scope of the wins is not considered.

Not heard from GB this week but he may just be busy.

Whose the Yorkist player?