Page 1170 of 1364

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 7:30 am
by Rob123
Div D

Rob123 Syracusan 280-211 BC with Carthaginian 235-146 BC allies challenges Delbruck Roman 105-25 BC with Numidian 55 BC -6 AD allies

PW Roman
PM sent

Re: Morbio has won Late Antiquity Division B!

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 9:06 am
by dim30
Well played Morbio. A good army choice, a good doctrine and a excellent player.

Re: Morbio has won Late Antiquity Division B!

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:59 am
by IMC
Great result Ade. I don't feel so bad now. I'm in very good company. BW Ian

Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 11:20 am
by stockwellpete
HMA tables a-d.jpg
HMA tables a-d.jpg (192.69 KiB) Viewed 1539 times
HMA tables e-f.jpg
HMA tables e-f.jpg (80.5 KiB) Viewed 1539 times

Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 11:46 am
by stockwellpete
HMA charts a-c.jpg
HMA charts a-c.jpg (290.5 KiB) Viewed 1395 times
HMA charts d-f.jpg
HMA charts d-f.jpg (256.7 KiB) Viewed 1395 times

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 11:47 am
by stockwellpete
CA tables a-d.jpg
CA tables a-d.jpg (201.7 KiB) Viewed 1435 times
CA tables e-f.jpg
CA tables e-f.jpg (109.18 KiB) Viewed 1435 times

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 12:11 pm
by stockwellpete
CA charts a-c.jpg
CA charts a-c.jpg (303.63 KiB) Viewed 1368 times
CA charts d-f.jpg
CA charts d-f.jpg (306.43 KiB) Viewed 1368 times

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 1:19 pm
by Malabar26
Division C

Malabar26 (Byzantine) beats Ironclad (Soissons) 52-10

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 1:53 pm
by olddog52
Tratmot lets play.
Carthaginian (Hannibal in Africa) 202 BC (1600) vs olddog52 - Thessalian 404-353 BC (1600)
PW elephantbbq

Re: Classical Antiquity: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 2:17 pm
by Sgt0gre
Division F
Sgt0gre - Indo-Parthian 60 BC-30 AD challenges Jack-3kBattery - Seleucid 302-301 BC with Lysimachid 320-281 BC allies

PW= qwerty

Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 2:37 pm
by Geffalrus
Division A

Geffalrus (Antigonids) defeats Stew101 (Etruscans) 46-11

From the chronicles of when bad ideas somehow work out: The Etruscans had a good position with a high hill on their left, a low ridge in their center, and open ground on their right where they massed cheap infantry and plentiful cavalry. My initial plan was to skirmish and draw them down off their slopes, but my skirms kept disrupting and failing at their one job, so I just said YOLO and charged. Only one pike was disrupted in the ensuing impact phase, and the quick application of a general kept that unit from disintegrating until some freed up cavalry could arrive for a flank attack. The rest of the pikes set to work stabby-stabbing the warbands and imitation legions, who got some unlucky cohesion rolls and started to fall apart. In the end, the pikes did an exemplary job in the center, while the flanks managed to "Not Die Quickly" enough for victory to be achieved.

Good game to my opponent.
Screen_00000462.jpg
Screen_00000462.jpg (510.13 KiB) Viewed 1425 times

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 3:39 pm
by edb1815
Division B

edb1815 (Egyptian) defeated IMC (Cypriot) 45-16

Our second game is closer but the Egyptians again have the upper hand in the closing stages.

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 4:41 pm
by carpenkm
Division D

carpenkm (Urartian) beat bomber23 (Assyrian) 43-12

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 4:42 pm
by carpenkm
Division D

carpenkm (Assyrian) beat bomber 23 (Urartian) 57 - 27

Thanks for both the games Bomber 23. Well played and I think the luck favoured me.

Re: Biblical: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 4:43 pm
by carpenkm
Thanks for both the games Bomber 23. Well played and I think the luck favoured me

Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 5:44 pm
by ericdoman1
Division A

ericdoman1 - Irish 1131-1259 AD and Norwegian 1050-1154 AD allies defeated tyronec - Italian (Ghibelline) 1200-1319 AD + Kingdom of Sicily 1200-1266 AD 46 - 19

Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2021 7:10 pm
by olddog52
Division E

Spacemonkey76 - Palmyran 258-273 with Armenian 253-476 AD allies (1600) wins vs olddog52 - Byzantine 579-599 AD (1600) 48%-21%

A scroll was found in a leather pouch next to what appeared to be the remains of a horse and rider it was dated 22 june, we can't read the rest. One line stands out. We have had no news of this army till now and we have no understanding of how this could happen. God save the Empire!

Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .

Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2021 12:48 am
by Geffalrus
Division B

Geffalrus (Tuareg) defeats nyczar (Germans) 51-24

Bit of a surprise to be honest. German foot knights are monsters in open terrain, so when I started with a bunch of rough ground and steep slopes to hide on, I was determined to set up camp and sit out a draw. Seemed like the smart play after I got obliterated going on the offensive against the Anglo-Normans and Berbers. But then I got bored and decided to see if I could grab the enclosure just below my fortress of solitude. Nyczar tried to politely inform me that those were his enclosures, but I ignored his lies. Small groups of units were fed into an escalating cauldron of violence, and somehow the Tuareg horde was able to get the better flank attacks and come out on top. On the very last turn. Because apparently most of my matches with the Tuareg go the full 24 turns for some reason.

And that does it for my experiment with a meme army in HMA. Thank you to all my opponents for some very interesting matches.

Final positions:
Screen_00000168.jpg
Screen_00000168.jpg (495.14 KiB) Viewed 1505 times

Bonus hilarity: "Hans, do you smell something behind us......?"
Screen_00000164.jpg
Screen_00000164.jpg (307.14 KiB) Viewed 1505 times

Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2021 3:11 am
by Nijis
Div B

Challenges issued

Nijis - Khorasanian 821-1003 AD with Arab (Abbasid) 836-873 allies
vs
kraff - Bulgar (Danube) 852-1018 AD with Pecheneg 850-1122 AD allies (password kraff)
lunecastle - Scots 851-1051 AD with British 600-1030 allies (password lunecastle)

DMs sent

Re: High Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .

Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2021 3:21 am
by Nijis
Div B challenges issued


Nijis - Mongol 1223-1241 AD
vs
Karvon - Free Canton 1200-1319 AD with German (North-West) 1200-1319 AD allies (password Karvon)
SLancaster - Papal 1050-1154 AD with Italo-Norman 1061-1071 AD allies (password SLancaster)

DMs sent