Slitherine

Restricted number of British deployment locations.
Moved a few Japanese units south at start.
Added Japanese airstrip construction group.

The 2v2 as 1vs1 . Just to many darn units to keep track of. Maybe because we were playing both sides at the same time. I would lose track of what I was trying to do. Maybe if you cut the game in half, as it were, Northern and southern fronts??

Changed the objective details (goals still the same).
The number of US transports the Japanese must sink is still not decided, a couple of 1v1 playtests need to be run first.

Erik wrote:Changed the objective details (goals still the same).
The number of US transports the Japanese must sink is still not decided, a couple of 1v1 playtests need to be run first.

Needs a little tweeking , end of the first turn.

I do have a flair for creating the odd quick-played scenario.
Changed the transports sunk from human US (which have none to start with...) to AI-US, that should help...

uploaded new version and challenges

Erik wrote: uploaded new version and challenges

D/loaded and turn sent.

Added faction New Zealand to accommodate its lone Blenheim squadron.

where to find Empress Augusta Bay scenario?

skyrider wrote:where to find Empress Augusta Bay scenario?

Custom Multiplayer Scenarios, second page.

Thanks. Picked it up. Now to find opponent. Brenmusik, Erik you interested in game?

Bren & I have a game going with me as US.
I'd like a game with me as Japanese as well. Put up a challenge with password Erik and I'll grab it.

Added scenario end triggers to all primary objectives to prevent auto-victory syndrome.

I hate to add to your plate , but Guam needs to be looked at for this auto victory syndrome also.

Just did, look at the post above yours

Sorry just didn't look

Complete overhaul of objectives.

Primary
Both the Japanese and the US must now sink at least 2 carriers and 2 battleships to win.
They also can't lose more than 1 carrier and 1 battleship.


Secondary
The Japanese must sink at least 6 US transports and can't lose more than 3 cruisers
The US must sink at least 4 cruisers and not lose more than 5 transports.
(The secondary objections are kind of mirrored).

This means the battle for the transports is just a prelude to the big battle later on (I hope).

Halved income for all factions. It was too easy to just buy new hardware whenever a ship was sunk.
Restricted deployable ports to the objectives ones. You now want to keep your naval assets ship shape as there may be a long way to the nearest port repair facilities.
Removed all unneccesary flags. No purchasing/deploying land units anywhere.

Can we try War in the Pacific 2.3 as a 1vs1 game?

skyrider wrote:Can we try War in the Pacific 2.3 as a 1vs1 game?

We can, give me a bit of time to transform it.

Halved income for both factions. It was too easy to just buy new hardware whenever a ship was sunk.
Restricted deployable ports to the objectives ones. You now want to keep your naval assets ship shape as there may be a long way to the nearest port repair facilities.
Removed all unneccesary flags. No purchasing/deploying land units anywhere.