Page 1049 of 1364
Re: Nosy_Rat has won Early Middle Ages Division A!
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 12:00 pm
by ericdoman1
Well done. Should have beaten you though:)
Re: Captainwaltersavage has won High Middle Ages Division D!
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 12:02 pm
by ericdoman1
Well played CWS
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 12:47 pm
by toska
Division E
toska - English 1155-1271 AD with Welsh (South) allies beats Darkwater247 - Scottish 1162-1319 AD with Scots Isles allies 63-53
(3-1)
Re: Nosy_Rat has won Early Middle Ages Division A!
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 3:02 pm
by Nosy_Rat
Thanks eveyone, Ghaznavids are officially new meta
ericdoman1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 12:00 pm
Well done. Should have beaten you though:)
You were close, probably next time

Re: Early Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 4:35 pm
by phlewis
Division F
phlewis with Arab (North Africa) 789-999 AD + Andalusian 756-1049 AD defeated hscic with Norman 923-1040 AD 49/12
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 6:48 pm
by ggarynorman
Division E
ggarynorman (Seleucid) beat angel42052 (Lysimachid) 45-19
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 9:19 pm
by harveylh
Division A
harveylh - German (North/West) 1200-1319 AD with German (Imperial) 1200-1319 AD allies defeats Nosy_Rat - Hungarian 1200-1319 AD with Tatar 1241-1339 AD allies, 56-31
Thanks for the game.
Re: ericdoman1 has won High Middle Ages Division B!
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 10:01 pm
by SnuggleBunnies
I first ran into eric several months ago when he picked up my mirrored match of Pyrrhic vs Roman. He mentioned that he had just started playing FoGII, but had played fair amount of FoGI. What followed was two close, thrilling games, and I knew then and there that we had a new Division A player on our hands!
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 11:30 pm
by edb1815
Division D
edb1815 (Lithuanian w/ Teutonic ally) defeated ulysisgrunt (English) 60%-50%
Quite a game. Well played. The Lithuanian infantry won their flank and eventually the day as the English knights and sergeants did major damage to the Lithuanian cavalry.
(3-1)
Re: High Middle Ages: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 12:57 am
by Jagger2002
Division C
Jagger2002 (Bohemian 1200-1319 AD with Hungarian 1200-1319 AD allies) defeats Ironclad (Mongols (Europe) 1223-1241 AD (1600)) 63-34
Wild, wild battle. Lot of fun.
Re: ericdoman1 has won High Middle Ages Division B!
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 2:39 am
by ericdoman1
Wow thanks SB. Although you did beat me quite easily in one of the games.
Re: Early Middle Ages: arrange your matches here . . .
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 4:02 am
by Trogilus
Div C
Trogilus - Dailami 928-1055 AD with Khorasanian 821-1003 AD allies
challenges
Swuul - Andalusian 756-1049 AD
pw eagle
pm sent
Re: Just over 2 weeks left in the tournament now!
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 7:17 am
by Swuul
stockwellpete wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 10:38 am
Classical Antiquity
Division B
desertedfox v Swuul - no information.
MATCH IN PROGRESSION, SHOULD END SOON
Swuul v Trogilus - challenge issued by Trogilus 2/4, not started yet.
MATCH IN PROGRESSION
stockwellpete wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 11:30 am
Early Middle Ages
Division C
Conteshard v Swuul - no information.
MATCH IN PROGRESSION, SHOULD END SOON
Swuul v Trogilus - no information.
MATCH IN PROGRESSION
Swuul v ulysisgrunt - no information.
MATCH NOT YET STARTED (my mistake, I though we had already played it
)
Updated my info. I have to apologise all my esteemed opponents this season, I have been extremely busy this whole time. If I had known how real life takes a swing, I wouldn't have taken part as I haven't had really been able to put any thought into my turns

Re: Calling gjhabcvhj . . .
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 7:44 am
by stockwellpete
gjhabcvhj has not contacted me by the deadline so all his remaining matches have been adjudicated.
Classical Antiquity Division F
Delbruck v gjhabcvhj - match awarded to Delbruck 4-0 (voting 3-0).
telesien v gjhabcvhj - match awarded to telesien 4-0 (voting 3-0).
Late Antiquity Division F
McHarg v gjhabcvhj - match awarded to McHarg 4-0 (voting 3-0).
phlewis v gjhabcvhj - match awarded to phlewis 4-0 (voting 3-0).
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 8:04 am
by stockwellpete
Division F
Adjudications
Delbruck v gjhabcvhj - match awarded to Delbruck 4-0 (voting 3-0).
telesien v gjhabcvhj - match awarded to telesien 4-0 (voting 3-0).
Re: Late Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 8:06 am
by stockwellpete
Division F
Adjudications
McHarg v gjhabcvhj - match awarded to McHarg 4-0 (voting 3-0).
phlewis v gjhabcvhj - match awarded to phlewis 4-0 (voting 3-0).
Re: Classical Antiquity: winners post your results here . . .
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 8:26 am
by Stew101
Division B
Stew101 (Numidians) beat Aetius39 (Pyrrhic with Samnite Allies). Score 50 - 22.
Another cracking game with Aetius.
The Greeks had the best of the game in the centre, but the imitation legionaries held long enough and mostly rallied when broken.
On the Greek left the Numidians got the upper hand and eventually overcame the Greek flank defenders to overcome this flank.
On the Greek right, the Numidians committed to a skirmish and contain policy.
This included the now infamous 'Numidian Gambit', the sacrifice of a heavy cavalry unit to slow the Greek advance.
This nearly backfired, when the cavalry were charged by a pike unit, which then overcharged twice in the same turn and smashed right into the heart of the defences, brushing units out of their way.
It would all have been so very different, but for a Numidian elephant unit on this flank, which turned the tide. The elephant was fragmented, but its opponents broke and it rampaged forward, taking out another couple of Greek units.
This one really could have gone the other way, by at least the same score.
Thanks Aetius, another in our series of epic games.
Always a pleasure, looking forward to the next encounter.
Re: 2 weeks left in the tournament now! Please check these lists . . .
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 9:44 am
by random27
High middle age
random27 v toska - no information.
game in progress , maybe 5 turns played
Re: ericdoman1 has won High Middle Ages Division B!
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 9:49 am
by Captainwaltersavage
Well deserved victory. I remember I played a game or two against you thinking you were a beginner and I was soon out of my depth.
Re: ericdoman1 has won High Middle Ages Division B!
Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 11:05 am
by ericdoman1
Thanks CWS. It's my 5th month of playing. I think our games were quite close but I have been playing ancients on and off for nearly 30 years using different rulesets. Winning this and LA was a surprise for me, not being relegated was my priority. Also doing well has probably proven I am a good player and confirms stockwellpete's decisions to place me in the higher divisions as being correct.