Yes, that's what I meant. It's in the first mission where you fight alongside North Korea. Also, Pyongyang for some reason is a one tile city (unless there are multiple Pyongyang's in North Korea. Plus you fight on the eastern area of Korea not on the west)
There is a town that apparently has the same name as the capitalThunderhog wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 2:26 amYes, that's what I meant. It's in the first mission where you fight alongside North Korea. Also, Pyongyang for some reason is a one tile city (unless there are multiple Pyongyang's in North Korea. Plus you fight on the eastern area of Korea not on the west)
From the cunning North Koreans everything can be expected maybe it's Pyongyang's 2Akkula wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 2:40 amThere is a town that apparently has the same name as the capitalThunderhog wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 2:26 amYes, that's what I meant. It's in the first mission where you fight alongside North Korea. Also, Pyongyang for some reason is a one tile city (unless there are multiple Pyongyang's in North Korea. Plus you fight on the eastern area of Korea not on the west)
Yeah I realise you're doing a great job and we have a mini cult following here already ) Sad only one thing that there is no Vietnam could be made the second socialist war, the first was in 1979, and so your mod is difficult but awesome !!!!Akkula wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 1:38 pm No new nations for the time being.
To create new rosters consumes a lot of time, to create China, Japan, SK, NK, etc took me a LOT of efforts (a lot).
So for, I will focus on creating new campaigns, scenarios and some units (maybe add the Indian navy sometime).
Best regards,
Akkula.
https://life.ru/p/1118351Sometimes referred to as the first war in history between socialist states (by analogy with ‘first imperialist’ - ‘first socialist’)
During the US war against Vietnam, according to the recollections of a participant in those events, a Soviet military officer quarrelled with a Dak Kong officer. They agreed to a duel with homemade crossbows. Thank God, joint efforts managed to calm down the duelists. There was reconciliation and joint drinking of something stronger than tea. The Vietnamese told that their duelist specialised in destroying American helicopter pilots with a crossbow, for which he was presented with the title of Hero of Vietnam. Ours would certainly not have been so lucky then.....
https://komodo74.livejournal.com/22751847.html
I'm not suggesting shooting down helicopters with a crossbow, but guys with MANPADS wouldn't be superfluous 
So, THANK YOU to all the Modern Conflicts enthusiasts. So, THANK YOU to all the Modern Conflicts enthusiasts.Akkula wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 11:51 pm Hello guys.
I am working on Update 2.1. It will contain:
- New historical and fictional scenarios (how many, I don't know)
- New units
- Units icons reworked/improved.
- Bug fixes and small equipment adjustments.
I will post some screenshots later.
In parallel, I am planning to add TWO short campaigns related to the WW3 Story. Although, I don't know when those will be ready.
So far, 2.0/2.05 has 240 downloads
Best regards,
Akkula.
Jeez, I was looking at the very first screenshots of 2016..... I almost throw up, those first icons were so horrible
Exactly, adjusting some inconsistencies and some minor balance tweaks is what you might expect in the next update.
We have RPG Infantry, ATGM Infantry, and now we get ATGM (Long Range Fire and Forget) Infantryoutofspace1 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 9:15 am Akkula
First of all, I would like to thank you for version 2.05. Excellent work. In version 2.1 could you add Spike (Anti-tank guided missile) to the Polish military?
It has been on the armament since 2003.
"A total of 2,675 Spike LR missiles with 264 launchers and training systems were ordered in 2003 in a deal worth $425 million with deliveries completed by 2013."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spike_(missile)
So, some modifications have already implemented switching the firing mode from normal to anti-aircraft on ships and torpedo-carrier planes, so you can hide the torpedo (well, torpedoes are rarely attached to planes now, but cruise missiles are launched from strategic bombers). But we still have to hover over an aircraft carrier to bomb it ))))Imeror wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 2:48 pm
If you have the idea to rethink and rebalance naval warfare, I remembered something that could interest you.
There was a sub-mod by Rimski-One that tried some experimentations with the Modern Conflicts mod. (Link here: https://www.slitherine.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=115133).
Among his work, he touched on the naval system and found (in my opinion) an excellent idea that could interest you for the main mod.
In MC: surface ships (excluding aircraft carriers) can perform either anti-surface or anti-submarine missions, reflecting their real-life capabilities. If they can do both, the player can change their role by simply clicking on the green role button. This is a clever system that allows our warships to conduct two different missions, something they can do in real life. However, some vessels have another role that is not represented in MC: air defense missions.
In Rimski-One's sub-mod, another role is added. Some ships have three modes: anti-surface, anti-submarine (the two as in your mod), and anti-air. In anti-air mode, the ship acts like any other ground AA unit and automatically fires at any aircraft trying to attack friendly units. This encourages the player to organize their fleet formation wisely, ensuring it is protected against any potential enemy threat, and avoid leaving any ship isolated in hostile waters or too far the crucial carrier. It could also be interesting to add more NA to strike aircraft equipped with anti-ship missiles, as a real naval deterrent would exist.
In my humble opinion, the interaction between air and naval (minus the helicopters able to hunt sumbmarine, long range recon of AWACS and the mobile airfield that is a carrier) is currently pretty limited. Having strong anti-ship strike aircraft and powerful anti-air frigates as deterrent could create a new interesting dynamic between those two fields.
I take an example from the French Marine Nationale carrier group (since it's the equipment I know best): while the Horizon class can indeed conduct anti-surface and anti-submarine missions (as represented in the mod), its most important mission is to protect the fleet against any aircraft or missiles that could approach other ships; while the Aquitaine class is more specialized in the two roles that exist in MC, and the lightly armed Lafayette class primarily acts as a "support" vessel with anti-ship weapons. Like in any fleet, each ship have a specific role, even if some can complement each other.
These changes would force the player to choose the right vessel for the right mission and give more value to versatile ships. For example, "Sure, my Aquitaine class is perfect for hunting submarines and can also attack enemy ships, but to protect my carrier against all threats, including those from above, I need to use a Horizon class ship to escort it."
Rimski-One also implemented a naval mine system, with minesweepers having the same trait as engineers and minefields representing naval mines on the water. This adds another strategic element to naval warfare.
Maybe I have a bias since naval equipment is my favorite, but I think this could give more importance to the MC naval system on a whole.
I believe these improvements could give more importance to the MC naval system and make naval warfare more engaging and strategic. I had a lot of fun with the naval part of Rimski-One's sub-mod and thought it might interest you to consider using his system. It was really excellent.
Hello Imeror,
. But I have to be careful not to disrupt the balance of the already created campaigns/scenarios, so yeah, I will walk on a minefield soon 
But I will see it done.