Slitherine

SoA - WOTR Yorkist

Sharkall 23/41 vs Aristides 33/31

VPs for Sharkall :
Winning 2vp
33 break points caused to opponent = 11vp
3822/9300 manpower loss caused = 41% = 8vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 21VP

VPs for Aristides
23 Break points caused to opponent = 7vp
2439/12300 manpower loss caused = 19.8% = 3vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 10VP
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SoA - Free Company

Sharkall 31/35 vs Jonno 27/24

VPs for Sharkall :
Winning 2vp
27 break points caused to opponent = 9vp
3955/7200 manpower loss caused = 54.93% = 10vp (I know it's close to 55, but I think it gets rounded down to 50 ? )
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 21VP

VPs for Jonno
31 Break points caused to opponent = 10vp
3880/10500 manpower loss caused = 36% = 7vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 17VP

SoA - Welsh

BurinusAgricolae 35/44 beats Turk1964 45/44

VPs for BA :
Winning 2vp
45 break points caused to opponent = 15vp
4875/13200 manpower loss caused = 37% = 7vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 24VP

VPs for Turk
35 Break points caused to opponent = 11vp
2439/12300 manpower loss caused = 28% = 5vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 15VP

A really hard fight in which i was at last a little less unlucky than my brave opponent...

thanks turk for the nice game (as always)
BA

I posted challenges for LHG but neither have been taken - did I jump the gun? I assumed that once 3 chaps had signed up for an army, challenges could be made...

Also, I'm not listed 'officially' under HYW but as application had been approved a few posts above, I assume it's alright that I'm currently playing a coupla games from this army section.

Aristides wrote:I posted challenges for LHG but neither have been taken - did I jump the gun? I assumed that once 3 chaps had signed up for an army, challenges could be made...

Also, I'm not listed 'officially' under HYW but as application had been approved a few posts above, I assume it's alright that I'm currently playing a coupla games from this army section.

Fine on both points.

SoA - Free Company

Tiavals vs porsenna

VPs for Tiavals :
Winning 2vp
24 break points caused to opponent = 8vp
2306/7200 manpower loss caused = 32% = 6vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 16VP

VPs for porsenna:
8 breakpoints caused to opponent = 2vp
1537/8400 manpower loss caused = 18% = 3vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 5VP

Storm of Arrows section: WotR Yorkists

stockwellpete 23/34 beat Aristides 38/35

For me
winning = 2pts
38 break points achieved = 12pts
I killed 2,624 out of 10,500 - 24.9% = 4pts
No camp looted = 0pts

Total = 18pts

For Aristides
23 break points achieved = 7pts
He killed 2,491 out of 10,200 - 24.4% = 4pts
No camp looted = 0pts

Total = 11pts

Updated to here - posting shortly

Aristides wrote:I posted challenges for LHG but neither have been taken - did I jump the gun? I assumed that once 3 chaps had signed up for an army, challenges could be made...

Also, I'm not listed 'officially' under HYW but as application had been approved a few posts above, I assume it's alright that I'm currently playing a coupla games from this army section.

LHG Accepted. Im pissed and now we will cut yr skin....

SoA - HYW

Aristides vs Fedem

VPs for Aristides:
Winning 2vp
30 break points caused to opponent = 10vp
4160/9000 manpower loss caused = 45% = 9vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 21VP

VPs for porsenna:
18 breakpoints caused to opponent = 6vp
2200/10500 manpower loss caused = 20% = 4vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 10VP

Not wishing to pry too much here but is that last battle a twosome or a threesome!

I assume VPs for porsenna should read for fedem. Is that correct please?

Cheers

Figured it out.

OK results posted.

Anyone not already comitted to 2 armies, up for taking on the mamluk egyptians &/or ipsos alliance? Each has 2 players & we could do with a third please.

Cheers

petergarnett wrote:Not wishing to pry too much here but is that last battle a twosome or a threesome!

I assume VPs for porsenna should read for fedem. Is that correct please?

Cheers

They got spies. Now I know why I was defeated...cowards.....

SoA - WOTR Yorkist

BurinusAgricolae 12/33 beats iandavidsmith 29/29

VPs for Burinusagricolae :
Winning 2vp
29 break points caused to opponent = 9vp
3012/8700 manpower loss caused = 34,6% or 35% = 6 or 7vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 19 or 20VP

VPs for iandavidsmith
12 Break points caused to opponent = 4vp
1873/9900 manpower loss caused = 18,9% = 3vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 7VP


WE SHOULD BE HOMOGENEOUS ABOUT THE USE OF DECIMALS FOR THE % SOMEONE REPORTS THEM AND SOMEONE REPORT ONLY THE INTEGER (ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST). IN SOME RARE CASES IT MAY MAKE 1 POINT DIFFERENCE (SEE ABOVE)

I think everyone is rounding down. So 34.6 should net only 6vp, not seven...everytime.

Except when I play Tiavals (I need the point) and against StockwellPete...he'll never notice...

first i agree with burinus agricolae..we need to report the exact percentage (with decimals!) cause it can make the difference in the final score!
second i'm posting the 2 remaining games of free company contest for jonno and grudge bringer (pw is final)

Phew, these SOA Welsh bloodbaths are all very close, but this is the closest one yet. Also the first game I've seen in this comp where ther winner tooksignificantly more casualties than the loser. A moral victory to BillMc as I had a really nice hill

tullius (42/43) beat BillMc (46/44)

tullius:

victory = 2VPs
44 BPs = 14 VP
4316/13200 casulaties = 32% = 6 VP
no looting

total for tullius: 22 VPs

BillMc

42 BPs = 14 VPs
5625/12900 = 43% = 8 VP
no looting

total for BillMc: 22 VPs

So there you go - a won game, but drawn on VPs.

Thanks Bill, I enjoyed this one.

Jonathan

SoA - Yorkist

Aristides vs BurinusAg

VPs for Aristides:
Winning 2vp
36 break points caused to opponent = 12vp
3796/9900 manpower loss caused = 35% = 7vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 21VP

VPs for BurinusAg:
22 breakpoints caused to opponent = 7vp
2670/9300 manpower loss caused = 25% = 5vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 12VP

PeterG: "Not wishing to pry too much here but is that last battle a twosome or a threesome!"

Mea culpa - I copy and pasted from a previous post and forgot to change the name the second time. Apologies to all concerned!

Porsenna: "we need to report the exact percentage (with decimals!) cause it can make the difference in the final score!"

I think we anyway only get a VP for each 5% chunk of the opposing army we destroy - unless I've got it totally wrong...

Petrer I will take on the SOS Malmuks but which army is itas there are three? Can i also have the Crusaders if their is a spot left.If not i will have the Bulgarians
Cheers Turk

IFR- Early Achaemenid Persians vs Early Achaemenid Persians

Flatsix518 (4/30) vs Gazxtrix (42/36)

VPs for Flatsix518 :
Winning 2vp
42 break points caused to opponent = 14p
3550/10240 manpower loss caused = 34.6% = 6vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 22 VP

VPs for Gazxtrix:
4 Break points caused to opponent = 1vp
1120/9000 manpower loss caused = 12.4% = 2vp
Camp not looted = 0vp

Total VP: 3vp

Gazxtrix suffered the single worst turn of bad dice I've ever witnessed in FoG PC. Incredibly bad luck -- freakish.

His only satisfaction was killing my general in the last turn. My soldiers did their best to extract revenge.