Page 2 of 2
Re: CSI Sweep: Road to Moscow
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 12:50 am
by GabeKnight
Bruce, impressive. But how do you find the time to do all this? Didn't you mention you had a life besides OoB?
And as always, thank you both for all the good work, Erik & Bruce!

Re: CSI Sweep: Road to Moscow
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2019 9:46 am
by Erik2
Neither Bruce nor Erik have any life to speak of outside OOB.
Seriously, Bru is the QC-master.
Re: CSI Sweep: Road to Moscow
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 5:08 am
by terminator
01Crossing (1.00):

- Screenshot 1667.jpg (137.37 KiB) Viewed 805 times
Re: CSI Sweep: Road to Moscow
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:49 pm
by bru888
Erik, technically terminator is correct. I counted: You have 9 bunkers, 14 foxholes, and 21 fortresses in the scenario, a total of 44. Yet the scenario starts with 48 such targets:

- Screenshot 2.jpg (476.5 KiB) Viewed 791 times
When I eliminated all bunkers, foxholes, and fortresses, I still had 4 remaining targets:

- Screenshot 3.jpg (476.2 KiB) Viewed 791 times
That's because the Soviet planes that you placed in hangars count toward the total; the hangars themselves, that is, not the planes. Once they take off, the hangars disappear and the target count corrects itself:

- Screenshot 4.jpg (605.22 KiB) Viewed 791 times
Yet, when Soviet planes land, I imagine that they will create new hangars and throw the count off again. That is why you probably will want to do the trigger this way:

- Screenshot 1.jpg (229.15 KiB) Viewed 791 times
Re: CSI Sweep: Road to Moscow
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:56 pm
by bru888
bru888 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:49 pm
That is why you probably will want to do the trigger this way:
Which, when I ran the scenario in test mode, shows the proper number of targets from the beginning:

- Screenshot 5.jpg (477.02 KiB) Viewed 788 times
By the way, you sometimes place empty hangars on the map but
I believe these disappear as soon as the scenario starts so they shouldn't affect anything. However, I am not absolutely sure about that so it's something to keep in mind in conjunction with this type of thing.