Page 2 of 2

Re: Impetuosity Check

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 10:25 am
by stockwellpete
General Shapur wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 10:17 am Just make the charge directly at the trigger unit regardless of facing. Ie: if impetuous the unit becomes a 'mob' and charges - it has no facing.
Yes, that would work if it is programmable.

Re: Impetuosity Check

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 11:55 am
by melm
vakarr wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:23 am I think it very strange that an impetuous charge should not be triggered by light troops, as that is what tended to happen - troops got sick of being shot at by lighter troops and charged out to get them, defying their orders,
IMO, if one human player's unit is harassed by LF turn after turn, he will do something to get rid of the skirmisher, usually charging the LF in his turn. So we don't even need impetuous charge.

Re: Impetuosity Check

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 12:04 pm
by stockwellpete
melm wrote: Wed Feb 13, 2019 11:55 am IMO, if one human player's unit is harassed by LF turn after turn, he will do something to get rid of the skirmisher, usually charging the LF in his turn. So we don't even need impetuous charge.
What if the unit is camped on a hill though? Then he may be inclined to sit there. Sometimes this is OK in the context of a battle, but sometimes it leads to a sterile game.

Re: Impetuosity Check

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:15 pm
by MVP7
A ranged attack from the ZOC of impetuous unit could have of chance of triggering a immediate charge. Then actively turning away from skirmishers would be pretty hard and pointless since the enemy could just move to better shooting position on his own turn.

Re: Impetuosity Check

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:21 pm
by Delbruck
In the current version a player has no control of evades, but has full control of charges. Personally, I don't think I like the all or nothing approach for both.

Re: Impetuosity Check

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2019 6:48 pm
by TimDee58

Marmite is lovely and it is a by-product of beer-making. Beans on marmite toast. Beautiful! :D
this i need to try, sounds yummy

Re: Impetuosity Check

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:20 pm
by rbodleyscott
TimDee58 wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 6:48 pm

Marmite is lovely and it is a by-product of beer-making. Beans on marmite toast. Beautiful! :D
this i need to try, sounds yummy
You will either love it or hate it. (I love it)

Re: Impetuosity Check

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2019 9:59 pm
by vakarr
In Australia you eat Vegemite, not Marmite, and although they look the same and are made the same way, they do taste different (though probably not to people who don't like them). My brother had to test the content of Vegemite for his science course - result was 99% salt! Still a good antidote for drinking too much beer, though, because of its high vitamin B content.

Re: Impetuosity Check

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 12:23 am
by Morbio
rbodleyscott wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:20 pm
TimDee58 wrote: Thu Feb 14, 2019 6:48 pm

Marmite is lovely and it is a by-product of beer-making. Beans on marmite toast. Beautiful! :D
this i need to try, sounds yummy
You will either love it or hate it. (I love it)
Personally I'd rather rub sand in my eyes than eat Marmite. People who make Marmite should be.... no, I can't say what I think... This advert sums it up for me... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzeOPTkod4k